The bestselling Christian author and speaker Jen Hatmaker headlined women’s events and conferences and was profiled in Christianity Today. She and her husband founded a church in Austin; their family was featured in an HGTV series.

In 2020, she announced that she and her husband were divorcing. In May 2021, she stopped attending church services. She has now written a memoir of her experience titled Awake and has been interviewed by the New York Times and Time.

In the latter, she said,

I’m out of the church right now. I don’t know that I will ever go back, and I don’t know that I will never go back. I grew up under the steeples. My dad was a pastor. I married one at the ripe age of nineteen, and I have always been a part of the machine. I was a leader. I was an organizer. I was a pastor. I don’t even know what church could or would be for me just as a person. My lifelong exposure has left me in a place where I know too much. I have been a part of the problem. So I need a break from the machine.

Christians far from the character of Christ

I have never met Jen Hatmaker and cannot imagine her pain of recent years. But if I had a relationship by which to speak to her about it, I would think with her about her statement, “I don’t even know what church could or would be for me just as a person.”

As empathetically as possible, I would suggest that the only way to find out is to try. If she chooses to stay away from the church, she obviously will not experience how Jesus can work through his “body” to heal and redeem her suffering (1 Corinthians 12:27).

This issue is much larger than Jen Hatmaker’s story. Clergy abuse has damaged untold numbers of victims, many of them children. Many churches in the South were complicit in slavery and Jim Crow racism. Many of us have stories of pain resulting from Christians who were far from the character of Christ.

And even if the church does not disappoint us, God often does.

My father was very active in his church before he served in World War II and experienced such atrocities that he never attended church again. I am praying and grieving right now for the family of a dear friend who died recently of cancer after I and multitudes of others prayed fervently for his healing. I am praying and grieving for another dear friend whose cancer has come back despite my fervent intercession for him.

I wrote yesterday that trusting God in such times positions us to experience his best in response. But there’s more to say here.

“So this is what God’s really like”

As I noted in my first response to the Minneapolis church shooting, circumstances cannot change the character of an unchanging God (cf. Malachi 3:6; Hebrews 13:8). He is today what he was before the tragedy.

But this does not resolve the issue. C. S. Lewis wrote after his wife died of cancer:

Not that I am (I think) in much danger of ceasing to believe in God. The real danger is of coming to believe such dreadful things about him. The conclusion I dread is not “So there’s no God after all,” but “So this is what God’s really like. Deceive yourself no longer.”

Perhaps the Greeks got it right with their capricious deities atop Mt. Olympus. Perhaps God sometimes disappoints us because that’s just who he is.

Or perhaps my doubts say more about me than they do about him.

It makes sense for me to question the character of someone only if I know enough about them for my doubts to be fair to them and accurate to the facts. But I cannot see the future consequences of God’s present actions. I cannot know how he will redeem present suffering for a greater future good, as with Joseph’s imprisonment in Egypt, which led to his saving Egypt and his own family from starvation.

Nor can I know how he is redeeming present suffering in my life, as with Paul’s “thorn in the flesh” that led the apostle to trust God on a deeper level than ever before and then testify, “When I am weak, then I am strong” (2 Corinthians 12:10).

And doubting God when he disappoints me can only lead to further disappointment and further doubt, because I refuse to allow him to work in my life and then blame him when he does not.

When we trust God with our pain

Conversely, trusting God even when he disappoints us moves our faith from a transactional religion to a transformational relationship.

We all want the latter and would probably say this is how we relate to God. But if we turn from him when he does not do what we want, we discover that the former was actually the case. Choosing to trust him when we don’t understand him shows that our trust is not based on our circumstances. And this positions us to experience him on a level that changes our lives.

I can offer three ways this has been true for me personally.

First, when we trust God with our pain, we can experience his presence and comfort on a level we could not before the suffering came. When I was a summer missionary in East Malaysia many years ago, I experienced a deeper loneliness than I have ever felt before or since. But when I turned to God in my darkest hours, I felt his presence at a depth that marked my soul.

Second, when we trust God with our pain, he can use us in ways he could not before the suffering came. When our son and grandson were diagnosed with cancer, cancer survivors ministered to us as others could not. As Henri Nouwen noted, wounded people can be “wounded healers.”

Third, when we trust God with our pain, he can use our suffering to guide us into his purpose in ways he could not before the suffering came. My back challenges of recent years have led me to focus more on writing than ever before, a season of my work in which I am finding great fulfillment and joy. As Michel Quoist notes, God often leads us through our limitations.

When Satan’s “cause is never in more danger”

None of this makes pain less painful. But if you’re in such a season, perhaps I can encourage you to believe that there is more to your story with God than you can know today.

The greater the pain, the more we need a physician. The harder it is to trust our Father, the more we need to trust our Father. And a relationship with God that transcends feelings and circumstances shows the world that such faith is real and relevant, displaying the light of Christ in the darkest of days.

In The Screwtape Letters, C. S. Lewis notes that Satan’s “cause is never in more danger than when a human, no longer desiring, but still intending, to do [God’s] will, looks round upon a universe from which every trace of him seems to have vanished, and asks why he has been forsaken, and still obeys.”

Will you endanger Satan’s cause today?

Quote for the day:

“Afflictions are but the shadow of his wings.” —George MacDonald

Our latest website resources:

• Why are there so many attacks on churches?
• What does the Bible say about work?
• President Trump cancels Kamala Harris’ Secret Service detail
• Fifth grader survived shooting when his friend protected him
• Cracker Barrel, US division, Taylor Swift–Travis Kelce engagement & college football returns!

Denison Forum

Brand promises and the power of personal transformation

If you haven’t eaten the “comfort food” at Cracker Barrel, enjoyed the antique country paraphernalia decorating the walls, and shopped in their “country store,” you probably won’t care that they changed their logo and are modernizing their restaurants. Even if you have, you may not consider their corporate re-do an existential crisis.

But there’s more to the story than the fact that the company lost nearly $100 million in market value when its stock plunged after releasing its new logo. According to a creative director specializing in brand development, what Cracker Barrel has done is a textbook case of how not to rebrand.

Jeff Rifkin says the company’s core message is, “We don’t care about our core audience. We’re too busy trying to appeal to everyone and satisfying no one.” In his view, despite corporate explanations, Cracker Barrel erased the quirks and history that made people love their brand and thus lost touch with what it did best.

By contrast, the restaurant chain Chili’s is undergoing what Slate calls a “renaissance.” Three years after a new CEO and a team of executives were brought in to oversee a corporate revival, same-store sales were up 31 percent in the first quarter of this year. This marks the fourth consecutive quarter of double-digit growth, which the article describes as a “corporate turnaround for the ages.”

Their secret? Streamlining operations, simplifying their menu, emphasizing food quality and customer service, and focusing on what the restaurant is most known for—burgers, fajitas, appetizers, margaritas, and ribs. They’re not trying to compete with non-chain restaurants, fast-casual concepts, or quick trends. Instead, they’re innovating for what their chief marketing officer calls the “population that’s right down the middle.”

Why are the Dallas Cowboys so profitable?

One more brand in the news: the Dallas Cowboys are again the most valuable sports franchise in the world. The Dallas Morning News (DMN) reports that since 1996, the team has increased in value forty-seven times over, to a world-record $12.8 billion. However, the team has also failed to reach the NFC championship game even once over the same time frame, the longest such drought in the NFL.

How is this juxtaposition possible?

As the title of the eight-part Netflix docuseries that dropped this month shows, the Cowboys are still “America’s Team.” They boast the most followers of any NFL team on social media; their merchandise tops the league’s ranks and generates the most Google search interest. By the end of the upcoming season, they will have played in twenty-eight primetime games since 2021 (including Thursday night’s game with the world champion Philadelphia Eagles). That’s tied with the Kansas City Chiefs for the most over that span, though the Chiefs have played in the Super Bowl each of the last three years, winning twice.

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones has clearly mastered what Nobel Prize-winning economist Herbert A. Simon called the “attention economy.” As the DMN article explains, “In an information- and entertainment-abundant world, people’s attention acts as a scarce commodity, like oil or diamonds, and producers of content become valuable by commanding and controlling large amounts of that commodity.”

In this sense, the team’s thirty-year record of playoff futility works in their financial favor. As longtime Cowboys announcer Brad Sham noted, “There is no sports hate in America that comes close to Dallas Cowboys hate,” but those who hate the team “will never stop talking about them.” As a result, Sham said, “If someone in Massachusetts or Nevada turns on a Cowboys game hoping they’ll lose, that doesn’t matter to the ratings. All that matters is that they’re watching.”

Jesus “never asks us to decide for him”

Unlike the Dallas Cowboys, for whom “there’s no such thing as bad publicity,” the Christian “brand” is undermined every time Christians are in the news for the wrong thing. Our clergy abuse scandals call into question the trustworthiness of our leaders. Our political entanglements alienate those who disagree with our politics.

But there’s a deeper issue here, one illustrated by the contrast between Cracker Barrel and Chili’s.

Methodist evangelistic camp meetings of the early nineteenth century issued public invitations for people to come forward to trust in Christ. Revivalist Charles Finney popularized the practice; D. L. Moody and Billy Graham used what came to be known as the “altar call” in their evangelistic meetings as well.

There is nothing inherently wrong with making public our faith in this way, of course. The Bible calls us to acknowledge Christ “before men” (Matthew 10:32) as we “confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord” (Romans 10:9). However, as I’m certain Revs. Finney, Moody, and Graham would agree, “deciding for Christ” is not enough.

Oswald Chambers put it this way: “[Jesus] never asks us to decide for him, but to yield to him, a very different thing.”

Jesus called us to “take my yoke upon you,” which means to submit our lives to his authority (Matthew 11:28). We are to “present your bodies as a living sacrifice” (Romans 12:1), to be “crucified with Christ” (Galatians 2:20), to take up our cross and follow Christ “daily” (Luke 9:23). The reason is simple: Jesus can change only what he can touch. He can transform our lives to the degree that he is Lord of our lives.

And transformed lives are the Christian “brand promise,” nothing less.

“If man is not fit to govern himself”

Like many churches and denominations today, we can change our theology to adapt to the popularity of LGBTQ and abortion ideologies. Like some in the evangelical world (and despite the clear teachings of Acts 4:12, 1 Corinthians 3:11, and John 3:18), we can jettison our culturally unpopular belief that Jesus is the only way to salvation.

But if we abandon the core tenets of biblical Christianity, we lose touch with what we do best: offering the gospel, which is the only “power of God for salvation to everyone who believes” (Romans 1:16). By contrast, if we yield our lives daily to Christ as Lord and lead everyone we know to join us, we can never be the same. Nor can they.

Such moral and spiritual transformation is crucial to the future of our democracy. As James Madison asked, “If man is not fit to govern himself, how can he be fit to govern someone else?” And it is crucial to the future of our souls. As Paul noted, “Every athlete exercises self-control in all things. They do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable” (1 Corinthians 9:25).

Which type of wreath will you seek today?

Quote for the day:

“We are all servants. The only question is whom we will serve.” —R. C. Sproul

Our latest website resources:

• Donald Trump and Michelangelo on going to heaven
• Was Noah’s ark real? How we can learn from his faith
• What does the Global Flourishing Study reveal about faith and well-being?
• When peace feels impossible:  Ceasefire talks, Christ’s hope, and summer’s biggest box office hits & misses
• A review of “Miracle in Progress” by Chip Waggoner: A powerful testimony of God’s redemption

Denison Forum

The Texas Senate passed a controversial bill over the weekend, creating five new GOP-leaning districts, following a similar Texas House vote earlier in the week. Gov. Greg Abbott stated that he would “swiftly” sign the bill into law when it reaches his desk. When he does, Democrats and civil rights groups are expected to challenge the new maps in court.

In response to the Texas redistricting bill, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the “Election Rigging Response Act,” which would transform five Republican seats into districts that heavily favor Democrats. If California voters approve the measure in a special November 4 election, it would cancel the GOP seats gained in Texas.

The term “gerrymandering” was first used in 1812 when Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry signed a bill redrawing state senate election districts. Though Gerry was a signer of the Declaration of Independence and US vice president under James Madison, his name has been forever linked to what many consider political powerbrokering.

Speaking of Mr. Madison: Patrick Henry tried to gerrymander him out of a congressional seat in 1789, showing that the practice is nothing new. Election districts have been redrawn over the years through legislative procedures such as we are seeing in Texas and through court actions. Both parties have engaged in the practice as a means of increasing their political power.

But is such partisanship what Mr. Madison and the Founders intended?

How America became the “United” States

I just finished reading The Quartet: Orchestrating the Second American Revolution, 1783–1789 by Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Joseph J. Ellis. He describes in vivid detail the remarkable work of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison, and (indispensably) George Washington in leading the newly independent United States to become a truly “united” nation.

As Ellis shows, the “Cause” for which the thirteen American colonies fought was independence from England, not the forging of a national government to which they would be subsidiary parts. Most colonial Americans considered such a sovereign power over the various states to be a continuation of the English monarchy and a violation of the purpose for which they fought. They saw their future as a kind of Europe, with small “countries” linked by common trade.

But Gen. Washington and his three colleagues were convinced that such independent colonies could not survive, much less thrive, in the face of European threats to dominate the New World. They would need each other if they were to retire the massive debt incurred by the war, develop viable trade relations with Europe, and settle their western frontier as well. The Constitution they therefore created and led the colonies to adopt was a vital expression of the American motto, E pluribus unum, “Out of many, one,” words that are emblazoned on our Great Seal and US coinage.

However, the “Quartet” and those they influenced also knew that Americans were too disparate to be represented by a single party or ideology. This is why they created the three branches of our governance with their checks and balances, permitting no individual or group to have unaccountable power over others. Within such governance, our two-party system has provided a means of debating our vital issues and achieving compromise when necessary to benefit the common good.

“America’s identity as a unified nation is eroding”

That was then, this is now.

Many analysts believe the US is more divided today along ideological and political lines than at any time since the years leading to the Civil War. Our partisan divisions reflect deep cultural chasms:

• Of the fifteen US states with the most restrictive abortion laws, all voted for Donald Trump in 2020.
• Of the twenty-one states with the most permissive gun laws in 2023, nineteen voted for Mr. Trump in the 2020 election.
• Of the twenty-three states that imposed restrictions with regard to transgender participation in school sports and other LGBTQ issues, twenty-two voted for Mr. Trump.

Gerrymandering, whether done to benefit Republicans or Democrats, reflects these divisions and deepens them as well. Redistricting is intended to make a voting district safer for the party in power, with the effect of reducing the number of competitive districts. As a result of such efforts and larger demographic shifts, analysts rate just three dozen of the nation’s 435 House districts as competitive in the upcoming midterm elections.

Consequently, according to the Wall Street Journal, “America’s identity as a unified nation is eroding, with Republican- and Democratic-led states dividing into separate spheres, each with its own policies governing the economic, social, and political rules of life.” Less than 20 percent of Americans now live in a state where the minority party has a meaningful voice in governance. A recent Harvard analysis found that 98 to 99 percent of Americans live in areas segregated by partisanship.

But without political debate, competition, and compromise, the views and needs of America’s very disparate population are underrepresented. And if Americans feel they are facing “taxation without representation,” we are back where we started when our drive for independence from England began.

A movement that “transformed American culture”

Dr. Ellis ends The Quartet with the approval of the US Constitution and the ascension of George Washington to the presidency. So we might ask ourselves: What continued to unify the new nation once its widely disparate people achieved the purpose for which they originally came together?

The answer is spiritual, not political.

According to historian Thomas S. Kidd, the Second Great Awakening that began in the 1790s catalyzed an explosive movement of churches, church membership, and personal conversion. He writes that this awakening “spawned an incredible array of reform, publication, and missionary agencies that transformed American culture and sent the Christian gospel to the far corners of the earth.”

Such spiritual unity amid cultural diversity should not surprise us: early Christians were even more disparate than early Americans (Acts 2:9–11), but they were “filled with the Spirit” (v. 2) and therefore united in biblical truth, community, worship, and prayer (v. 42).

Accordingly, “every day, in the temple and from house to house, they did not cease teaching and preaching that the Christ is Jesus” (Acts 5:42), as “the word of God continued to increase, and the number of disciples multiplied greatly” (Acts 6:7).

As a result, their movement “turned the world upside down” (Acts 17:6).

When we are as submitted to the Spirit as they were, do you believe God will use us as powerfully as he used them?

Quote for the day:

“In union there is strength.” —Aesop

Our latest website resources:

• Was Noah’s ark real? How we can learn from his faith
• Hurricane Erin forces thousands to evacuate: A reflection on mortality and divine redemption
• What does the Global Flourishing Study reveal about faith and well-being?
• When peace feels impossible:  Ceasefire talks, Christ’s hope, and summer’s biggest box office hits & misses
• A review of “Miracle in Progress” by Chip Waggoner: A powerful testimony of God’s redemption

Denison Forum

Dr. James Dobson passed away yesterday morning at the age of eighty-nine. Best known as the founder of the media ministry Focus on the Family, he was an advisor to five US presidents and one of the best-known Christian leaders of his time.

Many are offering profiles of his life and tributes to his legacy today. However, there is a less-noted dimension of Dr. Dobson’s story that relates to us all, no matter what his direct influence on our lives and families may have been.

From a book to a media empire

Born in 1936 in Shreveport, Louisiana, James Clayton Dobson Jr. was the son, grandson, and great-grandson of Church of the Nazarene ministers. His parents were traveling evangelists, but he studied academic psychology and came to believe that he was called to become a Christian counselor or perhaps a Christian psychologist. He attended Pasadena College, now Point Loma Nazarene University, then began working at the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles. In 1967, he received his doctorate in psychology from the University of Southern California (USC).

That same year, Dr. Dobson became an Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at the USC School of Medicine, where he served for fourteen years. After his teaching career at USC, he spent seventeen years on the staff of the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles in the Division of Child Development and Medical Genetics.

In response to the disintegration of moral principles he witnessed in his clinical practice, he published his bestseller Dare to Discipline in 1970. In 1977, he founded Focus on the Family, leading the organization to become a multimedia empire by the mid-1990s with ten radio programs, eleven magazines, numerous videos, basketball camps, and resources sent to thousands of churches each week. In 1995, the organization’s budget was more than $100 million annually.

At its peak, Dr. Dobson’s daily radio program was carried by more than four thousand stations across North America. His broadcasts were also translated into twenty-seven languages and distributed in more than one hundred and sixty countries. In 2010, after leaving Focus, he created the Dr. James Dobson Family Institute as a smaller but more personal platform to continue his mission with a sharper focus on his personal broadcasts and teaching.

Dr. Dobson was known not only for his family counseling, which influenced generations of Christian parents, but for his political activism as well. He was among the founders of the Family Research Council in 1981, a federal lobbying organization, and the Family Policy Councils, which lobby at the state government level. He strongly opposed gay marriage and nurtured relationships with conservative politicians.

“A strange affinity for the trained mind”

I believe the reach and impact of Dr. James Dobson’s ministry is attributable in significant measure to a factor that is urgently relevant for all American Christians.

Pastors from the book of Acts to today have been called to shepherd families, which includes support for parents amid their challenges. As a pastor for four decades, I met with many families who were struggling in various ways with their marriages, children, and parents. However, I had no secular credentials or academic training to offer them. My background is in philosophy, theology, and biblical interpretation, not psychology or psychiatry. Most pastors are similar to me in training and experience.

By contrast, Dr. Dobson leveraged his secular education, experience, and status to serve spiritual truth and transformation. For someone with his credentials and academic experience to offer Christian resources for parents was somewhat novel and enormously impactful. As an alternative to the highly secularized parenting theories popularized by Dr. Benjamin Spock, Dr. Dobson used his expertise in ways that served millions of families.

His example reminds me of a statement one of my mentors once made: “The Holy Spirit has a strange affinity for the trained mind.” The more trained we are, the more useful we can be. And when we employ reasoning and strategies that resonate with our audience, we are more effective in serving them. A secularized society can be helped to follow Christ and his teachings when we use secular logic and credentials to explain his word and encourage its obedience.

“No one was able to answer him a word”

Paul followed this strategy in Athens at Mars Hill (Acts 17:16–34). Knowing that the Greek philosophers he addressed would not care what the Scriptures say, he quoted their own poets and writers (v. 28) to expose the illogic of thinking that “the divine being is like gold or silver or stone” (v. 29), referencing the idolatrous statues that surrounded them at that very moment.

He was then able to pivot to the resurrection of Jesus, leading “Dionysius the Areopagite,” a “woman named Damaris,” and others to faith in Christ (v. 34). Eusebius, the first church historian, reports that Dionysius then became the first bishop of the church at Athens (Ecclesiastical History III.iv). He is venerated as the patron saint of Athens today.

Intellectual excellence is one of the hallmarks of God’s people across biblical history. For example:

• Joseph’s wise management saved Egypt and his own family from famine (Genesis 41–47).
• In Babylon, God gave Daniel and his three companions “learning and skill in all literature and wisdom” such that “in every matter of wisdom and understanding about which the king inquired of them, he found them ten times better than all the magicians and enchanters that were in all his kingdom” (Daniel 1:17, 20).
• Paul was a student of Gamaliel, the leading teacher of his day (Acts 22:3); even Roman officials noted his “great learning” (Acts 26:24).
• Jesus at the age of twelve was so brilliant that “all who heard him were amazed at his understanding and his answers” (Luke 2:47). As an adult, he debated his opponents so effectively that they “marveled” (Matthew 22:22) and “no one was able to answer him a word, nor from that day did anyone dare to ask him any more questions” (v. 46). In addition, the crowds who heard him “were astonished at his teaching” (v. 33).

Despite the anti-intellectual current of evangelicalism across recent generations, Christians should be the best scholars, the best doctors and lawyers and businesspeople and teachers, the best at whatever we do. This is because Jesus was the most brilliant person who ever lived (cf. Matthew 12:42), and you and I now have “the mind of Christ” (1 Corinthians 2:16) and are “partakers of the divine nature” (2 Peter 1:4).

What God expects and deserves

The same Spirit who empowered Christ now lives in us to empower us (1 Corinthians 3:16). When we submit our minds and lives to him (Ephesians 5:18), we are enabled to “think about” that which is true, honorable, just, pure, lovely, commendable, and excellent (Philippians 4:8). Our Master therefore instructs us: “Whatever you do, work heartily, as for the Lord and not for men” (Colossians 3:23). He expects and deserves no less.

Pastor and author Jack Hyles noted,

“If a task is worthy of our attention, it is worthy of our best.”

What is worthy of your attention today?

Quote for the day:

“The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be kindled.” —Plutarch (AD 40–120s)

Our latest website resources:

• Hurricane Erin forces thousands to evacuate: A reflection on mortality and divine redemption
• What does the Global Flourishing Study reveal about faith and well-being?
• When peace feels impossible:  Ceasefire talks, Christ’s hope, and summer’s biggest box office hits & misses
• A review of “Miracle in Progress” by Chip Waggoner: A powerful testimony of God’s redemption
• Public, private, homeschool, or online? A guide for Christian parents

Denison Forum

Parents in Silicon Valley are spending up to $50,000 for new genetic-testing services that include promises to screen embryos for high IQ. In related news, a Chinese scientist who, six years ago, created the world’s first gene-edited babies has now set up a company in the US he’s calling the “Walmart of gene editing” to produce high-IQ babies. A woman who was briefly married to this scientist is also creating a company in New York City to compete with him in creating gene-edited babies.

Moral questions abound, of course, from the ethics of altering genes in ways that will be inherited and thus alter the species, to the fairness of using technology to benefit only those who can pay, to the wisdom of modifying genetics without knowing the unintended consequences of such experimentation.

Here’s what no one seems to be asking, however: Are the embryos being tested and modified human? No one is asking because the answer is so obvious.

And this fact points to the truth I want to highlight today.

Scientists record embryo implanting in a womb

First, let’s consider a second story in the same context. An article recently published on NPR begins this way: “For the first time, scientists have recorded a human embryo implanting into a womb in real time, a feat the researchers hope will lead to new ways to treat infertility and prevent miscarriages.”

The story quotes Samuel Ojosnegros, head of bioengineering in reproductive health at the Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia in Spain: “Being able to record a movie of something that has never been seen before, which are the early steps of life—of human life—was mind-blowing.” The article then explains, “One of the most important steps in an embryo’s journey to becoming a baby is when the microscopic ball of cells implants in the uterus. But how a human embryo implants in the womb has long been a mystery.”

Here’s what struck me: the article (like others covering this story) consistently refers to the embryo being implanted as “human.” This is because it cannot be anything other. Its DNA, chromosomes, and cells clearly are not those of any other species or entity.

And yet the article states that implantation in the womb is “one of the most important steps” in the journey to “becoming a baby” (my emphasis). The embryo is already “human” but not yet a “baby”?

Abortion, Hamas, and mental gymnastics

This distinction is fundamental to legalized elective abortion. It was cited by the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade: “We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins.” It is the rationale for those who say they are “pro-choice” but not necessarily “pro-abortion”: since “no one knows for sure when life begins,” the choice should be with the mother, or so we’re told.

Consider the logic of such mental gymnastics. A human embryo is by definition human, whatever its stage of development. No one who came to this question with objectivity regarding abortion would think otherwise. A strong bias for elective abortion is required to outweigh and overcome what is otherwise obvious.

We can apply the same reasoning to the pro-Hamas demonstrations that broke out after the terrorist group committed horrific atrocities against Israeli civilians on October 7. Thousands were murdered; many were raped and mutilated; children were massacred. By what logic would we expect students who claim to support the “oppressed” to take the side of the oppressor who instigated such atrocities?

Once again, mental gymnastics are brought to bear. In this case, Critical Theory applies Marxist ideology to paint Israel as the oppressor and colonizer of Palestinians and then to defend any Palestinians who oppress their oppressor in their quest for “justice.” Massacred children and babies are ignored.

Why we committed our last sin

Our ability to justify whatever enables us to do what we want is at the center of the fallen human condition. In this sense, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick” (Jeremiah 17:9).

You and I are not exempt. The last time we sinned, we did what we knew not to do or did not do what we knew to do. But while we knew that “sin when it is fully grown brings forth death” (James 1:15), we somehow justified our behavior to ourselves.

This fact points to a theme we’ve been discussing all week: our only hope for resolving human conflict and improving human flourishing lies in the transformation Christ brings to the human heart. Ann Voskamp was right: “Peace isn’t a place to arrive at but a person to abide in.” This is why we’ve explored ways we can experience the risen Lord Jesus more intimately in our quest to love God with “all” our heart, soul, mind, and strength (Mark 12:30).

The same principle applies to ways we “love your neighbor as yourself” (v. 31).

I have quoted and preached on Jesus’ statement that we are the “salt of the earth” more times than I can count (Matthew 5:13). But recently I read a commentary on this phrase by St. John Chrysostom (c. 347–407) that gave me insight I had never considered before. He asked:

What do these words imply? Did the disciples restore what had already turned rotten? Not at all. Salt cannot help what is already corrupted. That is not what they did. But what had first been renewed and freed from corruption and then turned over to them, they salted and preserved in the newness the Lord had bestowed. It took the power of Christ to free men from the corruption caused by sin.

“The second most powerful force in the universe”

Human words cannot change human hearts. You and I cannot convict a single sinner of a single sin or save a single soul. This is the sovereign work of God’s Holy Spirit. But we can partner with the Spirit by speaking the words he leads us to speak and doing the things he leads us to do.

As we work, God works.

If we were engaged in editing genes, our work could change our species. If we are engaged in editing souls, our work will change eternity.

Billy Graham noted,

“Sin is the second most powerful force in the universe, for it sent Jesus to the cross. Only one force is greater—the love of God.”

With whom will you share the most powerful force in the universe today?

Quote for the day:

“To be a soul winner is the happiest thing in the world. And with every soul you bring to Jesus Christ, you seem to get a new heaven here upon earth.” —Charles Spurgeon

Our latest website resources:

• What does the Global Flourishing Study reveal about faith and well-being?
• When peace feels impossible:  Ceasefire talks, Christ’s hope, and summer’s biggest box office hits & misses
• Michigan Wolverines face NCAA sanctions for stealing signs
• A review of “Miracle in Progress” by Chip Waggoner: A powerful testimony of God’s redemption
• Public, private, homeschool, or online? A guide for Christian parents

Denison Forum

St. Catherine’s Monastery, 275 miles from Cairo in the depths of the Sinai desert, is the oldest continually inhabited Christian monastery in the world. Built at the foot of the mountain where many believe Moses saw the burning bush and subsequently received the Ten Commandments, it has served as a sanctuary of worship, refuge, and scholarship for more than 1,500 years.

I was privileged to visit the monastery some years ago, where I was deeply moved by the monks’ passion for worship, community, and scholarship. They are stewards of some of the world’s oldest biblical manuscripts, treasures they continue to study and make available to the world.

However, their future is now in peril.

In May, an Egyptian court issued a ruling that allows the state to control what is and is not allowed at St. Catherine’s, stripping the monks of all legal authority. The government has already taken control over academic access to the site and continues to undermine its autonomy. With enough pressure, the monks may be forced to abandon the ancient monastery altogether.

Ironically and tragically, this oppression is being conducted in the name of religion. Egypt’s Islamic government is gradually subsuming non-Sunni religious institutions and refuses to shield Coptic Christians, churches, and homes from attacks. It also refuses to permit renovations of churches while pouring enormous sums into building and renovating thousands of mosques.

What is the essence of Christianity?

Oppressing Christianity in the name of religion is nothing new, of course.

Jesus’ greatest persecutors were religious leaders convinced they were serving God by their actions. Saul of Tarsus was similarly certain that by persecuting Christians he was imprisoning heretics (cf. Acts 22:3–5). Jihadist Muslims see Christians as infidels who oppose the one true faith and must therefore be opposed in the name of Allah (cf. Qur’an 2:190).

However, we don’t have to persecute the church to fall prey to the temptation of religion that competes against a genuine relationship with Jesus.

I’m old enough to remember a day when church activities consisted primarily of worship and Bible study. Then churches discovered that they could add buildings and programs to attract the community and hopefully attract them to the Lord. Gymnasiums, family life centers, children’s and youth weekday activities, and need-based programs (AA, divorce recovery, and so on) proliferated. These strategies followed Jesus’ example as he met felt needs to meet spiritual needs, healing bodies to heal souls.

Such programs can be effective ways to reach people who likely would not come to a worship service or a Bible study. I know of pastors and other Christian leaders who reached for Christ through softball leagues, sports programs, recovery groups, and similar ministries.

But the downside of the upside is that we can confuse activities at church with a transforming relationship with Jesus himself. Our Great Commission is clear and simple: the church exists to “make disciples” of Jesus by evangelizing the lost and equipping the saved (Matthew 28:19–20). If we do anything else, we can be many things—but we are no longer the church.

Our Lord was clear: “Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28). Not “come to my teachings,” or “come to my movement, “ or “join my church,” but “come to me.”

Experiencing the risen Lord Jesus himself is the essence of Christianity.

“God is the strength of my heart”

In his Confessions, St. Augustine famously prayed, “You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in you.” The second phrase explains the first.

God made you and me in his own image so we could have a personal relationship with our Maker (Genesis 1:27). This only makes sense. Humans can relate to humans on a level different from our relationship with any other living beings, not to mention inanimate objects.

Because “God is love” (1 John 4:8), he made us for intimacy with himself. This is why we are commanded to love God with “all” our heart, soul, mind, and strength (Mark 12:30). Everything “religious” we do is to be a means to this end: We worship God as our “Audience of one,” as Kierkegaard reminded us. We read Scripture to hear “God preaching,” as J. I. Packer noted. We pray to commune with our Lord. We serve others to serve him.

In fact, God says everything we do in life is to be a means to the end of knowing him and making him known:

Let not the wise man boast in his wisdom, let not the mighty man boast in his might, let not the rich man boast in his riches, but let him who boasts boast in this, that he understands and knows me (Jeremiah 9:23–24).

According to Paul, anything we must give up to know God personally and intimately is a cost worth paying: “I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord” (Philippians 3:8).

The psalmist agreed:

Whom have I in heaven but you? And there is nothing on earth that I desire besides you. My flesh and my heart may fail, but God is the strength of my heart and my portion forever (Psalm 73:25–26).

“Let us run with confidence and joy”

On the Mount of Transfiguration, Peter said, “Lord, it is good for us to be here” (Matthew 17:4 NIV). St. Anastasius, the seventh-century abbot of St. Catherine’s Monastery at Mt. Sinai, commented on Peter’s declaration:

Let us run with confidence and joy to enter into the cloud like Moses and Elijah, or like James and John. Let us be caught up like Peter to behold the divine vision and to be transfigured by that glorious transfiguration. Let us retire from the world, stand aloof from the earth, rise above the body, detach ourselves from creatures and turn to the Creator, to whom Peter in ecstasy exclaimed: “Lord, it is good for us to be here.”

It is indeed good to be here, as you have said, Peter. It is good to be with Jesus and to remain here forever. What greater happiness or higher honor could we have than to be with God, to be made like him and to live in his light?

Therefore, since each of us possesses God in his heart and is being transformed into his divine image, we also should cry out with joy: “It is good for us to be here.”

When last did you “retire from the world” to “turn to the Creator”?

When last was it “good” for you to be with Jesus?

Why not today?

Quote for the day:

“Everything we do for God will be the overflow of intimacy with God.” —Dan Baumann

Our latest website resources:

• A review of “Miracle in Progress” by Chip Waggoner: A powerful testimony of God’s redemption
• Pro golfer Ben Griffin rebounds after “creatine overdose”: Why we need the faith to have faith
• Changed people change the world
• Public, private, homeschool, or online? A guide for Christian parents
• School bus crashes on the first day of school: A reflection on fear, evolution, and faith

Denison Forum

“I’m optimistic that collectively, we can reach an agreement that would deter any future aggression against Ukraine.” This was how President Donald Trump, meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and seven European leaders yesterday, expressed his belief that a way can be found to end the war.

While the leaders were gathered at the White House, Mr. Trump called Russian President Vladimir Putin to begin arrangements for a meeting between Mr. Putin and Mr. Zelensky, to be followed by a trilateral summit including himself.

In other news, we learned yesterday that Hamas has accepted an updated proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza. Sources say the proposal is a partial deal for a sixty-day ceasefire, the release of ten live hostages, eighteen deceased hostages, and the release of Palestinian prisoners. This is reportedly part of a last-ditch effort to reach a deal and avoid a major new Israeli offensive to occupy Gaza City. Several Hebrew media reports said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would examine the proposal.

The news comes after more than two hundred thousand Israelis took to the streets demanding that Mr. Netanyahu not launch a new offensive and instead sign a deal. It was the largest such demonstration since the beginning of the war.

14,513 wars over 5,500 years

Both stories point to a common denominator: our inability to resolve human conflict through human agency.

We can resolve specific conflicts, of course, as demonstrated by peace treaties that end wars. But we cannot resolve human conflict itself. From Cain and Abel to today, murder and violence are part of our story. From Isaac and Ishmael to today, conflicts between Jews and Arabs have persisted.

It has been estimated that in the last 5,500 years, there have been 14,513 wars in which approximately 2,640,000,000 people were killed. As of 2024, there were approximately thirty active armed conflicts worldwide.

Let’s step closer to home: What conflicts are you facing today? What relational issues exist in your marriage, family, friendships, school, or work?

At this point, you might expect me to point to religion as the answer to the question.

I intend to do the opposite.

“I really have to slow down”

In Democracy Needs Religion, German sociologist Hartmut Rosa writes:

Often, when speaking to a large audience, I’ll ask a question that might be of some interest here as well: How many of you sometimes say to yourselves, or have at least recently thought something like, “I really have to slow down a little next year” or “I have to reduce some of my responsibilities, or else I’ll suffer from burnout” or “I’m in danger of burning out”?

When I ask this question, it almost always happens that nearly everyone in the room raises a hand. This has been the case regardless of whether I’m speaking to students, professionals, or even to retirees. The sense that “things can’t carry on in this way” has become a culturally dominant feeling.

His prescription is for us to turn to religion, which he characterizes as having the ability to transport us from ourselves into “resonance” with others and our larger world. Rosa emphatically does not specify Christianity or any other particular religion, pointing instead to religiosity and religious rites and rituals regardless of their specific referent or content.

I have no doubt that his brilliant exposition of religiosity’s capacity for such resonance is correct. When we pray to anything or anyone, we are obviously focusing beyond ourselves. When we sing worship songs or participate in other religious activities, we are thinking about the object of our focus and those with whom we share it.

Here’s my question: Since the vast majority of the planet’s population is religious, why does conflict persist?

Spiritual tetanus shots

My doctor recently told me I may need to get a tetanus shot, depending on when I was last vaccinated. This inoculation uses a toxoid, a weakened version of the toxin released by the bacteria that cause tetanus. The toxoid creates an immune response that protects me if I’m exposed to the actual bacteria in the future.

In other words, the shot will give me enough of the disease to keep me from getting the real thing.

To my point: If we seek to be religious in the amorphous sense Hartmut Rosa prescribes, we might experience resonance with the world beyond ourselves. But nothing really changes. We are spiritually “inoculated” in a way that keeps us from experiencing the transformation we need most.

Jesus diagnosed the human condition this way:

From within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, coveting, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride, foolishness. All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person (Mark 7:21–23).

Billy Graham commented on Jesus’ assessment:

The basic problem is in our hearts—and the reason is because we are alienated from our Creator. Instead of giving God his rightful place at the center of our lives, we have substituted the “god” of Self. Only Christ can change our hearts—and through us begin to change our world.

Questions I must often ask myself

You already knew that religion is no substitute for a genuine relationship with Jesus and that conflict with others can only truly be resolved by the transformation Christ alone can bring to our fallen hearts. As the axiom goes: Know God, know peace; no God, no peace.

But if you’re like me, you’re nonetheless tempted to substitute religion about Christ for an intimate relationship with him. You’re tempted to “check the box” of Bible study, prayer, and even reading articles like this one as religious acts done in the hope of divine favor in response. I’m just as tempted by religiosity as you are.

So, let me ask you what I must often ask myself:

• When last did you spend time with God for no reason except to be with him?
• When last did you read the Bible for no reason except to hear his voice?
• When last did you spend even ten minutes in silence listening to his Spirit?
• When last did you tell your Father from your heart that you love him?

Why not today?

Quote for the day:

“It is dangerous to be so busy that you have no time to wait on God.” —A. W. Tozer

Our latest website resources:

• A review of “Miracle in Progress” by Chip Waggoner: A powerful testimony of God’s redemption
• Pro golfer Ben Griffin rebounds after “creatine overdose”: Why we need the faith to have faith
• Changed people change the world
• Public, private, homeschool, or online? A guide for Christian parents
• School bus crashes on the first day of school: A reflection on fear, evolution, and faith

Denison Forum

“The weakness of the Church lies not in the lack of Christian arguments but in the lack of Christian lives.” (William Barclay)

The story of Scripture is the story of God’s power at work through God’s people. Seldom have we been a majority in any nation or culture. Whether it was kings or prophets, fishermen or tax collectors, former Pharisees or imprisoned apostles, God’s Spirit has used his people as salt and light in ways that changed the course of history.

Jesus taught his disciples this parable: “The kingdom of heaven is like a grain of mustard seed that a man took and sowed in his field. It is the smallest of all seeds, but when it has grown it is larger than all the garden plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and make nests in its branches” (Matthew 13:31–32).

The mustard seed is the “smallest of all seeds” used in Jesus’ day (about the size of a period at the end of a sentence today). Would anyone believe that a tree some ten feet tall could grow from it? But the farmer has faith. He plants it, waters it, and waits for it. It takes time, several years, in fact.

Eventually, that tiny seed becomes a tree so large that birds come from all over to settle on its branches. They eat some of the seeds it produces. And that tree multiplies itself until it makes more and more trees—all from one seed so small you must strain even to see it in your hand.

That, says Jesus, is how God builds his kingdom on earth. Here we have the mustard-seed movement: God uses anything we entrust to him to do more than we ever imagined he would. If only we believe he can.

The mustard-seed movement in Scripture

Let’s examine the mustard-seed movement in Scripture:

• Noah worked for one hundred years by himself to build an Ark to save the human race when it had never rained before.
• Moses stood before Pharaoh with nothing more than a rod in his hand and God’s call in his heart.
• David fought the mighty Goliath with a slingshot.
• Prophets like Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel spoke divine revelation with effect all out of proportion to their social status.

One of the most remarkable Old Testament examples of the mustard-seed movement is the story of Gideon at the Spring of Harod. I have led more than thirty study tour groups to this spot, one of my favorite sites in all of Israel.

The Midianites were the enemy of the Jewish people and an indestructible army: “They would come like locusts in number—both they and their camels could not be counted—so that they laid waste the land as they came in” (Judges 6:5). Yet God called Gideon to march against them, his thirty-two thousand foot soldiers against their vast army (Judges 7:3).

Then God said, “The people with you are too many for me to give the Midianites into their hand, lest Israel boast over me, saying, ‘My own hand has saved me.’ Now therefore proclaim in the ears of the people, saying, ‘Whoever is fearful and trembling, let him return home and hurry away from Mount Gilead.’ Then 22,000 of the people returned, and 10,000 remained” (vv. 2–3).

Then he told Gideon:

“The people are still too many. Take them down to the water, and I will test them for you there, and anyone of whom I say to you, ‘This one shall go with you,’ shall go with you, and anyone of whom I say to you, ‘This one shall not go with you,’ shall not go.” So he brought the people down to the water. And the Lᴏʀᴅ said to Gideon, “Every one who laps the water with his tongue, as a dog laps, you shall set by himself. Likewise, every one who kneels down to drink.” And the number of those who lapped, putting their hands to their mouths, was 300 men, but all the rest of the people knelt down to drink water” (vv. 4–6).

Now “the Lᴏʀᴅ said to Gideon, “With the 300 men who lapped I will save you and give the Midianites into your hand, and let all the others go every man to his home.’ So the people took provisions in their hands, and their trumpets. And he sent all the rest of Israel every man to his tent, but retained the 300 men. And the camp of Midian was below him in the valley” (vv. 7–8).

With these three hundred, each bearing a trumpet and a torch, they went to battle. And this was the result:

Gideon and the hundred men who were with him came to the outskirts of the camp at the beginning of the middle watch, when they had just set the watch. And they blew the trumpets and smashed the jars that were in their hands. Then the three companies blew the trumpets and broke the jars. They held in their left hands the torches, and in their right hands the trumpets to blow. And they cried out, “A sword for the Lᴏʀᴅ and for Gideon!” Every man stood in his place around the camp, and all the army ran. They cried out and fled. When they blew the 300 trumpets, the Lᴏʀᴅ set every man’s sword against his comrade and against all the army. And the army fled as far as Beth-shittah toward Zererah, as far as the border of Abel-meholah, by Tabbath (vv. 19–22).

The New Testament demonstrates the same pattern. Jesus told us that we are the salt of the earth and the light of the world (Matthew 5:13–16). It doesn’t take much salt to change the flavor of food or much light to shine in the dark. You can think of examples immediately:

• Peter, the fisherman who failed his Lord before preaching the Pentecost sermon
• Paul, the Pharisee who persecuted Christians before taking the gospel across the Empire
• John, exiled on Patmos where he received the Revelation for the world

The first-century church had no strategy for political power or cultural engagement. They simply went where they went as the people of God, and, by Acts 17:6, they had “turned the world upside down.”

And the same model has worked throughout Christian history:

• Martin Luther was an unknown German monk when he nailed his 95 Theses on the community bulletin board and sparked the Protestant Reformation.
• William Wilberforce read a relatively unknown book by Thomas Clarkson about the horrors of the slave trade and then worked to abolish it.
• And each of the Great Awakenings of the last three hundred years, even when led by well-known preachers, was fueled by the prayers and support of countless anonymous Christians who chose to embrace God’s call for their lives.

In short, God has always chosen to rely on the faithfulness of his people to advance his kingdom and help people to know him. And now it’s our turn.

So what would that look like in our culture today?

Denison Forum

President Trump’s meeting today with Russian President Vladimir Putin continues to dominate headlines. By the end of the day, we should have a better grasp on whether the talks will prove to be a helpful step on the path toward peace, a waste of time, or somewhere in between. However, as of this morning, any attempt to say what that outcome will be is, at best, an educated guess.

Over the course of this week, Dr. Jim Denison has written extensively on the meeting, what each nation may want from the negotiations, and why Putin appears to be so obsessed with Ukraine. Honestly, until the talks conclude, there’s really not much I could add to this discussion. As such, I’d like to focus today on a subject that is far less important to the future of our world but, perhaps, of even greater significance to the state of our culture: KPop Demon Hunters.

Now, if that statement seems hyperbolic, I understand. However, the animated film has already become one of Netflix’s most-watched offerings with over 184 million views in less than two months. The soundtrack that fuels much of the movie’s plot currently has three songs in the top ten of the Billboard Hot 100, with “Golden” taking the top spot. That achievement marks the first time a female group has topped the chart since Destiny’s Child back in 2001. The movie has even earned a limited theatrical release later this month, which Netflix designed to be a “sing-along” event.

As the parent of children who will inevitably ask to attend said sing-along, this is not good news. However, the reason may be different from what you would expect.

Is “KPop Demon Hunters” worth seeing?

When my family first saw the film advertised, our initial response was to scroll by without giving it a second thought. After all, a kids’ movie about demon hunters was not high on my list of ways to spend our time together. But when some friends from church told us a bit more about the film, we decided to give it a shot.

The story revolves around a group of three girls who use magical powers to slay demons while maintaining a barrier between their world and the underworld by inspiring people with their singing. Everything is going well until the demon overlord sends a demonic boy band to steal their fans and destroy the barrier. It’s a strange premise, to be sure, and I don’t blame you if you read that and have zero interest in seeing the film.

However, we all really enjoyed it. The central themes of owning your flaws and finding strength in community were solid and biblical, even if the makers of the film did not intend to highlight Christian concepts. While there were some conversations we had to have with our kids once it was done—more on that in a minute—overall, it felt like a solid use of our time, and I can understand why it has grown so popular.

Unfortunately, not every reason the film resonates with people is a cause for celebration. And its popularity reveals an important truth about the state of our culture and a threat we cannot afford to overlook.

A discussion about demons

As Isabel Ong writes for Christianity Today, “I am intrigued by our modern-day penchant for making monsters and demons safe—or cute or attractive or morally ambiguous—and how this might be creating a sense of spiritual ambivalence.”

Ong goes on to describe how our culture has largely lost its taste for battles between clearly defined good and evil. Instead, we often prefer a nebulous middle ground where characters have the potential for both and are free to decide on their own course.

She concludes that such moral ambiguity places us “at the center of every battle between good and evil. The narrative du jour is how a human, demon, or half-demon can successfully overcome the darkness within by their own strength. . . Mastery of the self is the pinnacle of achievement.”

This desire to see good in everyone while recognizing our own capacity for evil is not wrong. Every day presents us with the chance to choose God or to choose sin, and we are ultimately the ones responsible for that decision.

The problem arises when we forget that true good and evil exist, and the threat posed by the latter should not be underestimated.

Satan often prefers to stay in the background of our culture, feeding our fallen natures in ways that accomplish his purposes in a more subtle manner. As such, there aren’t a lot of chances to bring up the reality of Satan and his demons in a way that doesn’t feel forced.

That distinction between the fictional demons in the film and the real demons that Scripture describes is one of the conversations I alluded to before, and I was genuinely grateful for the way the film provided an organic opportunity to discuss that topic with my kids. However, the story’s central theme brings up a much more difficult discussion as well; one that is relevant to every one of us today.

How does your past define you?

As I mentioned before, one of the main themes in KPop Demon Hunters is the need to own our flaws if we’re going to find the strength to move past them. As with many things in our culture, that notion gets you most of the way to the truth before stopping just before the most essential part.

You see, a core characteristic of the gospel message is that we will never know God’s peace and joy if we are haunted by our sin. Trying to hide our past or act as though we can move past our mistakes without bringing them into the light is both unbiblical and ineffective. Insofar as the film points to that truth, it echoes God’s truth.

However, the gospel calls us to take the additional step of presenting our past to the Lord, repenting of our sins, and ultimately placing our trust in him rather than in ourselves to save us. That last part is often the hardest, even for Christians.

All of us have things we wish were different about ourselves; points of weakness or insecurity that Satan is adept at using to create cracks in our relationship with God. In such moments, the answer is not to simply embrace them as part of who we are but, rather, to remember that they pale in comparison to the identity available to us in Christ.

There is a freedom and joy in our relationship with God that is available nowhere else. We can find traces of it through friends and family or seek substitutes through work and performance, but true peace is and always will be found in Jesus alone.

Have you found that peace today?

Quote of the day:

“The true wonder of human beings is not that we are sinners, but that even in our sin we are haunted by goodness, that even in the mud we can never wholly forget the stars.” —William Barclay

Our latest website resources:

• Why are Trump and Putin meeting in Alaska?
• School bus crashes on the first day of school
• Trump-Putin summit, Taylor Swift news, AI talent wars, & what is superintelligence? | CB Ep. 32
• “F1,” “Top Gun: Maverick,” and the gospel of second chances
• Public, private, homeschool, or online? A guide for Christian parents

Denison Forum

President Trump said yesterday that he will try to get back some territory for Ukraine when he meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. He also stated that there would be “some swapping, changes in land” between Russia and Ukraine.

Whether the world could or should trust a “peace” to which Mr. Putin agrees on these terms is another matter, an issue I explored in my new website article, “Vladimir Putin and the problem of autocratic power.” But why would Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky agree to such an arrangement?

In recent days, he stated repeatedly that he would not concede Ukrainian land to Russia. Mr. Zelensky said last Saturday that his country could not violate its constitution on territorial issues, adding that “Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupiers.”

However, the Telegraph headlined yesterday that Ukraine is now “prepared to cede territory held by Russia” as part of a peace plan. It reported that Mr. Zelensky “told European leaders that they must reject any settlement proposed by Donald Trump in which Ukraine gives up further territory—but that Russia could be allowed to retain some of the land it has taken. This would mean freezing the frontline where it is and handing Russia de facto control of territory it occupies in Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, and Crimea.”

Russia currently occupies around 20 percent of Ukraine’s territory as defined by Kyiv’s internationally recognized 1991 borders. Conceding these regions would require a nationwide referendum in Ukraine.

Why would their nation make such a move now?

What is the history of Ukraine?

Ukraine is the largest country in Europe after Russia, with a land area about 87 percent the size of Texas and a population of more than forty-two million. Different areas of the region were invaded and occupied by numerous groups over the centuries, but they are all now part of Ukraine.

Most of Ukraine fell to Russian rule in the eighteenth century, then became a republic of the Soviet Union after World War I and the Russian Revolution of 1917. Parts of western Ukraine were divided between Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Romania. By the end of World War II, the borders were redrawn to include these western Ukrainian territories.

After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Ukraine voted for independence on December 1, 1991, with 92 percent of Ukrainians in support. After a mass protest movement in 2014 toppled the pro-Russian government, Russian troops occupied the Ukrainian autonomous republic of Crimea. Russia later annexed the peninsula. In February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine.

By some estimates, the current war has displaced a third of Ukraine’s population, with as many as 1.6 million Ukrainians forcibly transferred to Russian territories by Russian forces. Ukraine has suffered hundreds of thousands of casualties as a result of the war as well.

Why would the two sides trade land for peace now?

On the Ukrainian side:

• In Crimea, more than two-thirds of the population claims Russian as its native language.
• Nearly 30 percent of Ukrainians speak Russian as their first language; almost all are concentrated in the areas contested in the present war.
• Ethnic Russians are the largest nationality in some of these oblasts as well.
• The Ukrainian president has previously acknowledged that his armed forces lack the capabilities needed to reclaim land from Moscow.
• However, after any settlement, Kiev could still attempt diplomatic means to return the land to its control.

On the Russian side:

• Fortune reports that a “fiscal crunch” is about to hit Russia’s war machine. In June, the country’s economy minister warned that Russia was “on the brink” of a recession.
• Oil revenues are weakening while war spending continues to soar.
• Widening deficits may cause Russia to run out of financial reserves, forcing cuts to public expenditures. Such cuts could be highly unpopular with the Russian populace, threatening Mr. Putin’s standing with them.
• Over a thousand multinational businesses have exited from Russia.
• Inflation is skyrocketing, with basic food items becoming prohibitively expensive.

When zero-sum conflicts emerge

Obviously, no one knows what will transpire in Friday’s meeting, assuming it happens. But we do know that each side will do what it perceives to be best for its side. Henry Kissinger was right: nations have no permanent friends or enemies, only interests.

The problem comes in zero-sum scenarios by which one side must lose for the other side to win. With territorial disputes, this is often the case. Israel and the Palestinians both want Jerusalem for their capital. Taiwan claims independence from China, which claims the island as its own.

When zero-sum conflicts emerge, we discover another reason humanity needs the biblical worldview. Scripture consistently teaches that this world is not our home, that we are sojourners here and our “citizenship is in heaven” (Philippians 3:20). Accordingly, we can concede temporal means for eternal ends:

• We can “give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you” (Matthew 5:42), whatever the temporal cost of such compassion.
• We can forgive our enemies rather than seeking retribution or revenge (Matthew 5:43–48).
• We can give to the needy without recognition or temporal reward (Matthew 6:1–4).
• We can “lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven” (Matthew 6:20) by serving those who cannot serve us (Matthew 25:31–40).

If nations and people did what was just rather than what serves their temporal interests, the short-term cost would accrue to transformational long-term benefits. What would become of war? Crime? Sexual immorality? Prejudice and discrimination?

“Jesus will have none of that”

Acting in this way requires dying to self and living for the good of others. Only one Person has perfectly done this. The good news is that the same Spirit who empowered Jesus stands ready to empower us. The more we are yielded to him, the more we manifest his unconditional and sacrificial love for those he loves—and he loves everyone (Galatians 5:22; 1 John 4:8).

The way to measure whether we are “filled with the Spirit” (Ephesians 5:18) is to see how we treat people we don’t have to treat well, those who cannot repay us or benefit us in a way commensurate with our service to them. Tim Keller observed:

We instinctively tend to limit for whom we exert ourselves. We do it for people like us, and for people whom we like. Jesus will have none of that. By depicting a Samaritan helping a Jew, Jesus could not have found a more forceful way to say that anyone at all in need—regardless of race, class, and religion—is your neighbor. Not everyone is your brother or sister in faith, but everyone is your neighbor, and you must love your neighbor.

How will you treat the next neighbor you meet today?

Quote for the day:

“You can’t live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you.” —legendary coach John Wooden

Our latest website resources:

• Vladimir Putin and the problem of autocratic power: An issue that affects all churches and Christians
• Hear, hear. Listen up! God has something to say
• Major League Baseball’s first female umpire set to debut
• “Bite Club”: the fraternity you don’t want but need
• Meet the man who walked a high wire between the Twin Towers

Denison Forum

“The underlying cause of this trouble”

President Trump has announced that he will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska this Friday. In related news, Putin told the US he would halt his war with Ukraine in exchange for land in eastern Ukraine and global recognition of Russia’s claims to the territory. We also learned yesterday that the White House is considering inviting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to Alaska as well.

How likely is it that Ukraine would make such a land exchange? Or that Putin would honor a peace achieved in this way?

These questions point to a larger question foundational to the war and its global consequences.

Would Putin stop here?

Putin claims four eastern Ukrainian regions—Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson—as well as the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, which he annexed in 2014. According to an analysis by the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), if Ukraine does not concede these lands, Russia’s occupation of them through military means “is neither inevitable nor imminent, as Russian forces will face serious operational obstacles in what are likely to be multi-year endeavors.”

Even if Ukraine were to concede these regions on its border with Russia, would Putin stop there?

The ISW paper states that Putin has recently claimed that “all of Ukraine” is Russia’s. To this end, the analysis reports that he remains committed to “replacing the democratically elected Ukrainian government with a pro-Russian puppet government, reducing Ukraine’s military such that Ukraine cannot defend itself from future aggression,” and “destroying the Ukrainian state, identity, and culture and subjugating the Ukrainian people.”

According to Paul D’Anieri, a leading expert on Russia-Ukraine relations, “Much of the Russian elite, including Putin, rejected Ukraine’s independence from the very moment it happened back in 1991. That is the underlying cause of this trouble.”

Here’s the larger question: Why is Putin so antagonistic toward Ukraine?

“Geography is destiny”

The Arab philosopher Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406) reportedly observed, “Geography is destiny.” He could have been speaking of Russia and Ukraine.

Ukraine is part of the vast European Plain. This region is flat, with no natural features to deter an invading force. Accordingly, in the last five hundred years, Russia has been invaded across its western border by the Poles (1605), the Swedes (1707), the French under Napoleon (1812), and the Germans in both world wars (1914, 1941).

To Putin, controlling this border is vital to his nation’s security.

And there is the issue of warm-water access. Many of Russia’s ports on the Arctic freeze for several months each year. Its largest port on the Pacific Ocean is enclosed by the Sea of Japan, which is dominated by the Japanese. This halts the flow of trade into and out of Russia and prevents the Russian fleet from operating as a global power. This is why Russia annexed the Crimean peninsula in 2014 and insists on controlling it.

In the eighteenth century, Peter the Great took control of Ukraine as well as most of what we know as Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. This formed a huge protective ring around Moscow. The fall of the USSR in 1991 cost Russia territory, with its border ending at Estonia, Latvia, Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia, and Azerbaijan.

As long as a pro-Russia or even neutral government was in power in Ukraine, Russia could be confident of its buffer zone with the European Plain. But when a more pro-Western government came into power in 2014, Putin responded by seizing and annexing the Crimean peninsula. On February 24, 2022, he invaded Ukraine itself.

Putin and Peter the Great

Vladimir Putin has long seen himself as being on a historic mission to rebuild the Russian Empire, a goal with which many of his people agree. As Princeton history professor Stephen Kotkin notes, “Many Russians view their country as a providential power, with a distinct civilization and a special mission in the world.”

Putin often compares himself to Peter the Great, who founded the Russian Empire in 1721. Putin’s hometown is St. Petersburg, a city named for Peter and built on land he conquered from Sweden. Putin says he shares the eighteenth-century tsar’s goal of creating a Russian empire as it existed prior to 1917. This would call into question all of the former Soviet states as well as a large part of Poland, which was part of the Russian Empire.

Going back to Ivan IV (also known as Ivan the Terrible) in 1547, Russia has typically been ruled by a “tsar” (derived from the Latin caesar, meaning “emperor”). In 1721, Peter adopted the title of emperor and proclaimed the Russian Empire, though he continued to be called the tsar as well. According to Oxford historian Andrei Zorin, the “tsar” has been “deeply rooted in the cultural mythology of Russia” for at least five hundred years.

To this end, Putin keeps statues of four of Imperial Russia’s most revered tsars in the corners of his Kremlin cabinet office. A towering bronze statue of Peter the Great looms over Putin’s ceremonial desk. Putin says of Peter, “He will live as long as his cause is alive.”

The most powerful person who ever lived

Tomorrow we’ll explore Ukraine’s view of its history and its likely response to Putin’s demands. For today, we’ll close with this reminder: the quest for personal power commodifies people in a cycle of violence and vengeance that narrates human history.

Peter the Great tortured and killed his own son for allegedly conspiring against him and enslaved 540,000 people to build St Petersburg, many of them Swedish prisoners of war; as many as one hundred thousand died during the project. The British Ministry of Defense likewise estimates that over one million Russian troops have been killed or injured since Putin’s invasion of Ukraine began.

For Putin, these are merely means to the end of his personal power in his quest to restore Mother Russia. He treats the rest of his citizens with similar disregard. In my visits to St. Petersburg over the years, I marveled at the historic beauty of the city but grieved at the enormous number of homeless people, many of whom freeze to death during the brutal winters.

What Nietzsche called the “will to power” tempts all of us to be the tsar of our “empire” and exploit people as means to our ends. Here we find another reason we need what only Jesus can do in our fallen hearts.

Christ was the most powerful person who ever lived. He could calm stormy seas, heal diseased bodies, and even raise the dead back to life. And yet he “came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Matthew 20:28).

When we make him our Lord by submitting to his Spirit, we similarly exhibit his sacrificial love (Galatians 5:22), a power that ends wars, heals marriages and families, and restores nations. But only then.

We can seek our own transactional power or submit to the transforming power of God’s Spirit, but we cannot do both.

Choose wisely today.

Quote for the day:

“Jesus will say, ‘Well done, my good and faithful servant,’ not ‘Well said.’” —Sean Smith

Our latest website resources:

• Hear, hear. Listen up! God has something to say
• Major League Baseball’s first female umpire set to debut
• “Bite Club”: the fraternity you don’t want but need
• Meet the man who walked a high wire between the Twin Towers
• Why we need more ‘weeping prophets”

Denison Forum

A reality that breaks God’s heart

With yesterday’s introduction of GPT-5—the latest and most powerful version of the popular ChatGPT—artificial intelligence is back in the news, with the focus largely on how its advancements will impact day-to-day life. But while that story is important, today I’d like to discuss a more subtle way that AI is likely to change our lives going forward. Let’s start with GoLaxy, a Chinese company that would probably prefer to stay out of the news but has found itself at the center of a growing international controversy.

As Brett J. Goldstein and Brett. V. Benson—two professors at Vanderbilt University who specialize in international and national security—recently documented, GoLaxy is “emerging as a leader in technologically advanced, state-aligned influence campaigns, which deploy humanlike bot networks and psychological profiling to target individuals.”

They go on to note that the company—which denies any official connection with the Chinese government despite a preponderance of evidence to the contrary—has been used in recent years to promote China’s preferred candidates and positions across elections in both Hong Kong and Taiwan.

GoLaxy works by mining social media to build profiles “customized to a person’s values, beliefs, emotional tendencies and vulnerabilities.” They then feed that information through their AI personas to engage in conversations that feel sufficiently authentic and human enough to largely evade the protections companies put in place to limit or identify AI activity.

As Goldstein and Benson describe, “The result is a highly efficient propaganda engine that’s designed to be nearly indistinguishable from legitimate online interaction, delivered instantaneously at a scale never before achieved.”

Now it appears they are looking to expand their efforts into the United States, with data suggesting that they’ve already built profiles on at least 117 members of Congress and more than 2,000 other political and cultural leaders. And if their past actions are any indication of their future intent, odds are good that they won’t stop there.

Fortunately, the reviews are mixed on just how influential their efforts have been to date. They will likely improve with time, but for now, they seem to represent more of a potential threat than an imminent one. However, the same cannot be said for a growing trend in AI that resides much closer to home.

“The AI companion who cares”

On this week’s inaugural episode of Faith & Clarity—our recently relaunched Denison Forum Podcast—we discussed the rise of AI companions and their increasing pervasiveness throughout our culture. While ChatGPT and others are driving much of the innovation in Artificial Intelligence, these companion bots have carved out a growing niche among some of our society’s most vulnerable.

Companies like Character.ai, Replika, and others offer users the chance to engage with AI personas tailored to their whims while promising a judgment-free interaction. Replika, for example, markets its bots as “The AI companion who cares. Always here to listen and talk. Always on your side.”

While there are a host of reasons why such promises should send a shiver down your spine, the fact is that these companies have identified a very real need in our culture, and the statistics prove that they are increasingly effective at meeting it.

As of December of last year, Character.ai users spent an average of 93 minutes a day chatting with bots, which is 18 minutes longer than the average user spent on TikTok—the gold standard for social media addiction. As AI improves, it’s easy to see a world where that number only grows larger.

But while users claim these conversations are “harmless fun and can be a lifeline for people coping with anxiety and isolation,” the truth is that they are often relied upon most heavily by those who are least equipped to use them well.

That’s a problem we cannot afford to ignore. But how should it be addressed?

A flaw in the system

The most tempting cure for the misuse of AI will be to try to curtail its use or control the degree to which those most vulnerable to its abuse can gain access. A good example of that solution at work is the Illinois law passed this week, which makes it illegal for AI chatbots to offer any therapeutic advice or communication. But while the idea has merit, I doubt it will do much to truly solve the issue.

You see, the problem is not the technology. It’s the people who use it.

As long as there are hurting people who would rather find affirmation in AI than real relationships with other humans, services like these will have a market. We can try to limit access or curtail what kinds of services they can offer, but the root cause will still remain.

Given that the yearning for an accountability-free community is as old as the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3:8), I doubt we’ll fix that particular flaw in the system anytime soon.

But if we can’t stop the desire for what AI offers and we can’t prevent companies from making it available, what can we do? The Gospels give us a good place to start.

A level of intimacy AI can’t touch

Jesus had a habit of meeting with people who were desperate for connection, rocked by insecurity, and yearning for acceptance. Whether it’s the woman at the well, the leper afraid to do more than shout from a distance, or Peter after he denied even knowing Jesus, many of the most memorable moments throughout Christ’s ministry were stories of him meeting broken people and making them whole once again.

Unfortunately, in this world, it seems like for every Peter, there’s a Judas: someone in desperate need of God’s grace but too trapped in his guilt and sin to seek it. And that is just as true when it comes to AI as it is for any other temptation we face.

At the end of the day, we can warn people of the dangers, point them toward healthier alternatives, and do our best to offer the kind of genuine community they need, but it’s still up to the individual to decide whether or not they will accept it. The same free will that leads some to salvation traps others in damnation.

That reality breaks God’s heart (2 Peter 3:9), and it should break ours as well. But it’s the truth.

At the same time, on this side of heaven, it will always be too soon to give up on a person who needs Jesus. Our job is to love those God brings across our path and make sure every facet of our lives points to the joy, peace, and contentment that can only be found in him.

But we can’t offer others what we don’t have ourselves.

So, take some time today to ask God to help you identify any areas in your life where you need his healing. Truly open your heart and soul to his Spirit, committing to make whatever changes he asks of you and surrender any aspects of your life that are not submitted to him. Then ask him to make you aware of anyone you meet today who needs the same healing as well.

While AI can mimic a host of human interactions, it will never approach the level of intimacy available through the Holy Spirit’s presence in our lives.

How well will your life reflect that reality today?

Quote of the day:

“Technology is per se neutral: but a race devoted to the increase of its own power by technology with complete indifference to ethics does seem to me a cancer in the Universe.” —C. S. Lewis

Our latest website resources:

• Major League Baseball’s first female umpire set to debut
• Meet the man who walked a high wire between the Twin Towers
• Why we need more “weeping prophets”
• Texas redistricting drama, American Eagle firestorm, lunar mission & top 10 burgers | CB Ep. 31
• 5 soldiers shot at Fort Stewart in Georgia

Denison Forum

Eighty years ago yesterday, the American B-29 bomber Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later, a second atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki. In total, an estimated two hundred thousand people were killed.

Over the years, opinions have been sharply divided over whether the bombings were justified. According to Pew Research Center, 35 percent of Americans say they were, while 31 percent say they were not, and 33 percent are not sure.

So, on the anniversary of the only time nuclear bombs have ever been used in war, let’s ask if they were necessary. Then we’ll apply our discussion to an even more significant question, one that is relevant to each of us today.

Why this is so personal for me

By August 1945, it was clear that Japan had lost World War II. However, their leaders refused to surrender and instead had prepared to be invaded by Allied forces, recruiting civilians to fight alongside soldiers. Their purpose was to force the US to negotiate a peace that would leave Japan’s emperor and military government in power.

US President Harry Truman had four options:

1. Continue conventional bombing of the Japanese homelands. This had already caused an estimated 333,000 Japanese deaths with no move on Japan’s part to surrender.
2. Stage a ground invasion of the Japanese homelands. This would have caused “the largest bloodbath in American history,” with as many as a million American deaths.
3. Demonstrate the atomic bomb on an unpopulated area. However, there were only two bombs in existence at the time. If the test failed, Japan’s resolve would have been strengthened. And there was no way to know if such a demonstration would cause Japan to surrender.
4. Use the atomic bomb on a populated area. Truman chose cities primarily devoted to military production that were not centers of traditional cultural significance to Japan.

This issue could not be more personal for me, since my father fought the Japanese in the South Pacific. If an invasion of Japan had been attempted, he would likely have been among the soldiers staging the attack. And he would likely have been killed.

But there’s more to the story.

Averting “an even worse bloodbath”

In Atomic Salvation: How the A-Bomb Attacks Saved the Lives of 32 Million People, military historian and former naval officer Tom Lewis (PhD, strategic studies) examines what would have happened if the Allied forces had conducted a conventional invasion of Japan. He writes that an offensive in the manner by which Germany was defeated would have been “by amphibious assault, artillery, and air attacks preceding infantry insertion, and finally by subduing the last of the defenders of the enemy capital.”

By choosing to employ atomic bombs instead,

The deaths of two hundred thousand Japanese in the A-bomb attacks prevented the deaths of more than a million Allied troops, around 3.5 million dead in territories the Empire held, and around 28 million Japanese. Millions more on both sides would have been wounded (my emphasis).

He cites extensive data in great detail to support his conclusions. He also extensively documents the fact that Japan’s leaders and soldiers had no intention of surrendering to the Allies prior to the bombings; many did not want to do so even after the bombs fell. In fact, after the Japanese emperor chose to surrender, rebellions against his decision were staged in an attempt to continue the war.

Previous bombing raids had already killed more people than died as a result of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki strikes; such raids would likely have continued as part of a conventional assault and likely would have killed more people than the two atomic bombs. Lewis also documents evidence that Japan was working on a nuclear bomb when the war ended and responds in detail to arguments that the bombings were unnecessary for ending the war.

He quotes Japanese nuclear engineer Yoichi Yamamoto, who stated that if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, “millions more [from both sides] would have died. Japan was preparing to defend the homeland at all costs. . . . As terrible as they were, the American bombs averted an even worse bloodbath.”

The only way war will end

The Sixth Commandment, “You shall not murder” (Exodus 20:13), expresses an impulse enshrined in civilizations across recorded history. We know instinctively that we must not condone the murder of others lest we be murdered.

And yet Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, killing 2,403 people and causing the death of over thirty million people in the Pacific theater. Hitler invaded Europe, murdered six million Jews, and caused the death of at least thirty-nine million people in the European theater.

Americans are not exempt. Our Civil War led to the deaths of 750,000 soldiers and more than 50,000 civilians. Nearly twenty-three thousand Americans were murdered in 2023.

From Cain and Abel to today, every person killed by another person is a loss grieved by their Maker (cf. Genesis 4:9). Conversely, every murder pleases the devil, who was “a murderer from the beginning” (John 8:44). Our fallen, sinful human nature is powerless to resist fully his temptation to “steal and kill and destroy” (John 10:10).

This is why the gospel is so crucial, not just for our eternal life in the world to come, but for our flourishing in this world as well.

No one in human history but Jesus died for our sins, purchased our salvation, and promised to forgive our every failure, remake us as God’s children, and send his Spirit to live within us and transform us into his holy character. Only Jesus could turn a murderer like Saul into a missionary like Paul (cf. Acts 22:20–21). Only he could empower and impassion an English aristocrat like William Wilberforce and use him to abolish slavery in the British Empire. Only he can give us his sacrificial, selfless love for every person on our planet.

If we would submit our lives to his Spirit, murder and war would end. There would be no need for bombs to kill hundreds of thousands to prevent the deaths of millions. If all of us truly made Christ our Lord and truly lived by his word and will, imagine the impact on crime and culture. And imagine the “joy of the Lᴏʀᴅ” that would be our “strength” today (Nehemiah 8:10).

A prayer that changes everything

Jesus gave us the key to such joyful living in a simple prayer:

“Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven” (Matthew 6:10).

Will you join me in praying these words from your heart right now, and then in aligning your actions with your words?

Your life, and our world, can never be the same.

Quote for the day:

“While you are proclaiming peace with your lips, be even more careful to have it even more fully in your heart.” —Francis of Assisi

Our latest website resources:

• 5 soldiers shot at Fort Stewart in Georgia: A meditation on mortality and the greatest gift we can give
• Biblical clarity on climate change, Ten Commandments in the classroom, and AI companions
• The dangerous rise of sports gambling: A cultural crisis in the making
• How does a healthy shepherd model rest?
• What do miracles, sinful lifestyles, and David’s heart for God teach us about faith in today’s world?

Denison Forum

Four options and a providential alternative

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is considering ordering the complete reoccupation of the Gaza Strip, according to Israeli media. Israel’s security cabinet is due to meet tomorrow and would need to approve any such action.

However, senior officials have warned that the plan would endanger the remaining hostages, risk further international isolation of Israel, and require the IDF to administer a population in which Hamas fighters were still present.

The IDF says it already controls more than 75 percent of Gaza; according to the UN, only 12 percent of the enclave is outside the Israeli militarized zone or areas not affected by IDF evacuation orders. The majority of the population now lives in tent encampments in the southern part of the Strip.

The idea of Israel occupying all of Gaza raises several questions, chief among them:

What about the hostages?

Hamas abducted 251 hostages in the October 7 attack, of whom 202 have since been recovered. Twenty are presumed to be still alive, while twenty-nine are thought to be dead.

Video released by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad last week showed two hostages in a visibly fragile state. The International Red Cross said it was “appalled” by the videos and urged that the “dire situation must come to an end.”

However, negotiations for a ceasefire and hostage release deal have been stalled for some time. As a result, President Trump has reportedly given Mr. Netanyahu a green light to launch a more aggressive military operation against Hamas while making plans to significantly increase the US role in providing humanitarian aid in the enclave.

What are the alternatives?

Israel has insisted since October 7, 2023, that Hamas must be disarmed and dismantled and that all the hostages must be returned. They are now considering four options:

1. They could continue negotiations to secure the release of the hostages. Some speculate that reported plans to occupy all of Gaza are in fact a pressure tactic to force Hamas into a new deal. However, the terrorists have said they will not relinquish the hostages apart from guarantees of Hamas’s survival, which Israel sees as tantamount to permitting another Oct. 7 in the future.
2. The IDF could stage hostage rescue operations. However, the hostages are believed to be hidden deep underground in Hamas’s extensive tunnel network. And hostages freed from captivity have said that their captors were under orders to kill them if they thought Israeli troops were approaching.
3. Israel could clear the 75 percent of Gaza it controls and attack Hamas in the remaining 25 percent until submission. However, this will require operations in areas where hostages are currently being held.
4. The IDF could seek to control all of Gaza, including areas heavily fortified by Hamas. However, this increases the possibility of a rise in military casualties and puts the hostages at risk.

What Israel cannot do is continue the present stalemate. The hostages are getting weaker and public sentiment is rising for their return. Dr. Shay Har-Zvi, former acting director of Israel’s Strategic Affairs Ministry, warns: “If nothing is done, it will only get worse for Israel and for the hostages.”

Henry Kissinger famously observed, “The conventional army loses if it does not win. The guerrilla wins if he does not lose.”

An option I haven’t seen reported

As you can see, each of these options is fraught with potential disaster. As a result, let’s consider an option I haven’t seen reported by the secular media, but one with abundant biblical precedent.

When Samson was imprisoned in Gaza, he prayed for divine assistance and was then empowered to destroy the temple of their god Dagon and kill many Philistines (Judges 16:23–31). Similarly, when King Hezekiah “did what was right in the eyes of the Lᴏʀᴅ,” God empowered him and he “struck down the Philistines as far as Gaza and its territory, from watchtower to fortified city” (2 Kings 18:3, 8).

We can therefore pray for miraculous intervention by which the terrorists are defeated, the hostages liberated, and the Palestinian and Israeli people freed from Hamas’s despotic threat. God could do this through military means, as with Samson and Hezekiah. Or he could use political and cultural avenues.

For example, the leader of an independent Palestinian group in Gaza recently published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal stating that his movement opposes Hamas and seeks a peaceful future for their people. Top Palestinian officials in the West Bank similarly want to establish their own emirate, join the Abraham Accords, recognize the state of Israel, and secure peace for their people.

Perhaps God will use such leaders in Gaza to overthrow Hamas from within. Perhaps he will intervene miraculously to defeat them without further bloodshed. Perhaps the terrorists will experience a Damascus road-type spiritual awakening, turn to Christ, and repent of their atrocities. Perhaps God will act in yet another way to bring this crisis to a peaceful end.

“He may give us the more largely”

I don’t know how God might answer our prayers for Gaza. What I do know is that if we don’t pray, “You do not have because you do not ask” (James 4:2).

With the human options so limited, perhaps our Lord will redeem this horrible conflict by acting in ways that demonstrate his omnipotent providence. St. Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109) noted,

“God does not delay to hear our prayers because he has no mind to give, but that, by enlarging our desires, he may give us the more largely.”

As a result, the greater our prayers, the greater God’s answers.

Will you pray for great answers from God today?

Quote for the day:

“The greatest tragedy of life is not unanswered prayer, but unoffered prayer.” —F. B. Meyer

Our latest website resources:

• Biblical clarity on climate change, Ten Commandments in the classroom, and AI companions
• President Trump comments on the Sydney Sweeney controversy: The issue behind the issue
• The dangerous rise of sports gambling: A cultural crisis in the making
• How does a healthy shepherd model rest?
• Deion Sanders’ most recent struggle transcends football
• What do miracles, sinful lifestyles, and David’s heart for God teach us about faith in today’s world?

Denison Forum

Dozens of Democratic lawmakers left Texas yesterday, preventing the state House of Representatives from moving forward with a redrawn congressional map sought by President Trump. Gov. Greg Abbott ordered state police to find and arrest them, though state law enforcement is restricted to making arrests in Texas.

Other states have seen legislative walkouts over the years. Such moves can delay legislation and spotlight issues, but since Gov. Abbott can call special sessions month after month, the legislators will presumably have to return to the state at some point in the future.

Both parties over the years have gerrymandered political maps to advantage themselves; the governors of New York and California are now vowing to do the same in their states, for example. In response to such developments, California GOP Rep. Kevin Kiley has introduced a bill to block all fifty states from redrawing congressional maps before the 2030 census.

Such tactics have not typically gained political parties many seats over the years. However, a larger factor is at work here—one that is relevant to each of us and the future of our democracy.

A feature and not a bug

The Christian worldview was vital to our nation’s founding for three reasons.

First, the founders’ claim that “all men are created equal” was rooted in the biblical claim that each human is made in God’s image and likeness (Genesis 1:27) and therefore equal to all others in identity and status.

Accordingly, our governmental system purports to give each of us a vote and a voice. It took the 15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th Amendments and the 1965 Voting Rights Act to get there, and our democracy remains imperfect. But aspirationally, it seeks to provide every person and perspective a seat at the table of power.

Second, the biblical teaching that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23) undergirds the founders’ strategy of restraints on governmental power.

As political analyst Yuval Levin demonstrates, our system’s laborious process of legislation is a feature, not a bug. Its checks and balances are intended to keep any person or branch of government from exercising undue power over the process. This is not only because each person deserves to be heard, but also because no person deserves unaccountable power over others.

However, a third contribution of the Christian faith is foundational to the other two. And it is increasingly under duress in our secularized culture.

Jay Leno on late-night hosts

If gerrymandering is the strategy of redrawing political lines to favor political parties, a similar outcome is happening in America today, though not by the efforts of partisan politicians.

More than 20 percent of America’s counties gave 80 percent or more of their two-party presidential votes in 2020 to either Donald Trump or Joe Biden. This illustrates the thesis of journalist Bill Bishop’s 2008 book The Big Sort. He showed that Americans are increasingly clustering by religion, lifestyle, and politics into communities of like-minded people.

The recently announced end of The Late Show is an example. Jay Leno criticized late-show hosts for being so partisan that they “shoot for just half an audience.” And as former Sen. Ben Sasse noted recently in the Wall Street Journal, the end of the show illustrates the fact that we are “increasingly siloed by algorithms and the digitization of daily life.”

Here’s the problem, according to Sasse: “The Constitution requires a certain amount of unity, at least a minimal shared conception of the common good.” When our political parties eschew cooperation and compromise for tribal zero-sum tactics, they threaten the collective health of our democracy. And we cannot pass and enforce enough laws to force all of America’s 342 million people to behave morally.

Nick Saban on discipline and disappointment

The key to good citizenship lies not with us but with our Lord. We are called to “run with endurance the race that is set before us” by “looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith” (Hebrews 12:1–2). He alone can give us new hearts devoted to loving and serving others sacrificially and selflessly.

Our part is to practice spiritual disciplines in the Spirit: “For the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it” (v. 11). The disciplines of prayer, Bible study, and personal worship do not earn God’s favor but position us to experience his sanctifying grace.

Famed football coach Nick Saban noted, “There are two pains in life. There is the pain of discipline and the pain of disappointment. If you can handle the pain of discipline, then you’ll never have to deal with the pain of disappointment.” His adage was as true of our souls as it is of our sports.

To practice God’s transforming presence, we reject that which prevents such communion with him: “See to it that no one fails to obtain the grace of God . . . that no one is sexually immoral or unholy like Esau, who sold his birthright for a single meal” (vv. 15–16). This is a powerful metaphor: sin is selling our “birthright” as the children of God for a “single meal” that cannot satisfy the needs of our hearts.

As counselors say, we must choose what we want most over what we want now. Oswald Chambers was adamant:

The main thing about Christianity is not the work we do, but the relationship we maintain and the atmosphere produced by that relationship. That is all God asks us to look after, and it is the one thing that is being continually assailed.

What “makes good citizens”

Yesterday, liturgical churches remembered St. John Vianney, the patron saint of parish priests, on the anniversary of his death in 1859. He noted, “A Christian’s treasure is not on earth, it is in heaven. Well then, our thoughts should turn to where our treasure is.” We do this by practicing the presence of God in prayer:

“My children, your hearts are small, but prayer enlarges them and renders them capable of loving God. Prayer is a foretaste of heaven, an overflowing of heaven.”

One day in heaven, we will kneel before God; today in prayer, we kneel with God. When we are transformed into the character of Christ (Romans 8:29) by choosing intimacy with him and rejecting the immorality that harms us and our nation, we become the change we wish to see.

Daniel Webster believed, “Whatever makes men good Christians makes them good citizens.”

Will you be a good citizen today?

Quote for the day:

“He who shall introduce into public affairs the principles of Christianity will change the face of the world.” —Benjamin Franklin

Our latest website resources:

• President Trump comments on the Sydney Sweeney controversy: The issue behind the issue
• The dangerous rise of sports gambling: A cultural crisis in the making
• How does a healthy shepherd model rest?
• Deion Sanders’ most recent struggle transcends football
• What do miracles, sinful lifestyles, and David’s heart for God teach us about faith in today’s world?

Denison Forum

Steve Witkoff, President Trump’s Middle East envoy, joined US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee on a visit to a US-backed aid operation in Gaza on Friday. The Israeli military said two hundred trucks of aid were distributed by the UN and other organizations on Thursday, with hundreds more waiting to be picked up from border crossings inside Gaza. Food is now being airdropped into Gaza by six countries, including for the first time France, Spain, and Germany.

By way of background: In March, after a cease-fire with Hamas fell apart, Israel stopped the entry of all goods and supplies into the Gaza Strip in a move aimed at pressuring the terror group to accept a new proposal to extend the ceasefire. Many in Israel also viewed the agency that had been aiding the Palestinians as complicit with Hamas and terrorism.

However, as the Wall Street Journal reports, “Photos of starving children have proved too much for most of Israel’s leaders to withstand.” As a result, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has “reportedly bypassed extremists in his cabinet to expand opportunities for the delivery of vital supplies.”

I must begin by stating the obvious: the suffering of even a single person grieves the heart of the God who made them. But there’s more to this tragic story in Gaza, a factor that is relevant to the way we see all conflicts and all peoples today.

 “Hamas Wants Gaza to Starve”

Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib is a native of Gaza and a political analyst. His recent article in the Atlantic is titled, “Hamas Wants Gaza to Starve.” He writes:

Despite the surge of hundreds of trucks into Gaza over the past four days, very few supplies have made it into warehouses to be distributed to the population. Aid shipments are being seized by a combination of desperate civilians, lawless gangs, clan-affiliated thugs, and merchants of death. Chaos and apocalyptic scenery are the norm, not the exception.

Alkhatib reports that he has spoken with “dozens of Gazans who are furious about what is unfolding around them. . . . But their anger is directed primarily at Hamas, which they hold responsible for putting the people of Gaza in this position, and for its continued refusal to end the war that it started.”

In his analysis,

Hamas actually wants a famine in Gaza. Producing mass death from hunger is the group’s final play, its last hope for ending the war in a way that advances its goals. Hamas has benefited from Israel’s decision to use food as a lever against the terror group because the catastrophic conditions for civilians have generated an international outcry, which is worsening Israel’s global standing and forcing it to reverse course.

Since its horrific October 7 invasion that started Gaza on this road to ruin, Hamas has refused to return all its hostages unless Israel withdraws its forces and allows the terrorist group to remain in power. This, of course, would only prepare the way for another Oct. 7. Now Hamas is using the starvation of its own people to leverage its power as a platform for continued attacks on the Jewish state.

Even the Arab world recognizes Hamas for the terrorists they are. Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt have called for the group to disband and give up power, joining fourteen other countries in signing a statement that condemned the Oct. 7 attacks.

Why Hitler wanted to eradicate the Jews

Over my many travels to Israel, I have met some Israelis who view a Palestinian state as an existential threat to the Jewish people. They fear that if the Palestinians have their own nation, some will use it as a platform from which to attack Israel. Some, therefore, support Jewish settlements in Gaza and the West Bank and view the subjugation of the Palestinian people as necessary for the security of Israel.

For example, Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich want Israel to block all humanitarian aid into Gaza as long as Hamas holds Israeli hostages, whatever the consequences for the Palestinians there. They have called for the war to continue and seek the “voluntary” migration of Gaza’s population of two million Palestinians.

Hamas, by contrast, exists for the purpose of destroying Israel and the Jewish people. They are convinced that Jews are hostis humani generis, the enemies of humankind itself. Nor do they care for the people they are supposed to be serving, using Palestinian civilians as human shields and as pawns in their quest for power. The son of a founding Hamas leader said, “They don’t care for the Palestinian people. They do not regard human life.”

Viewing humans as a collective rather than as individuals is at the heart of this conflict.

For historical precedent, Wall Street Journal editorial writer Barton Swaim points to historian Thomas Weber, who notes that Hitler wanted to eradicate the Jews not because he thought individual Jews were evil. Rather, it was “because of their racial destiny or racial determination, which made it impossible for them to act in any other ways than parasitically.”

Why my father fought the Japanese

Reducing people to their race or the nation they occupy greatly simplifies geopolitics. We can then support or reject them as a collective without the hard work of understanding their individual needs, stories, and merits.

This is tragically necessary in war, of course. My father fought individual Japanese soldiers in World War II just as his father fought individual German soldiers in World War I, both as a means to defending America from Japan and Germany.

But whenever we can, however we can, we must resist the human tendency to devalue other humans by categorizing them as anything other than individuals made in the image of their Maker (Genesis 1:27). If you have children, you love each of them as if there were only one of them. Their Heavenly Father does the same.

So, please join me in praying for Palestinians who are suffering as a result of Hamas’s invasion of Israel and Israel’s response to it. Pray for the hostages still being held in horrific conditions by the terrorists. Pray for this tragic conflict to end in a way that protects both Palestinians and Israelis from future violence.

And pray for all Palestinians and all Israelis to meet the One who died for them and whose love will give them the peace their hearts seek most.

How a Satanist became a Christian

I once heard a former Satanist tell how he came to faith in Christ. He hated Christians with a passion, one in particular. But nothing he did could dissuade this believer from continuing to love him, pray for him, and seek to serve him.

At one point, the Satanist became so angry that he struck the Christian, knocking him to the ground. The believer touched his hand to his bleeding face, held it up to his persecutor, and said, “If you’re good enough for Jesus, you’re good enough for me.”

That’s the gospel. Who will hear—and see—it from you today?

Quote for the day:

“When you know how much God is in love with you, then you can only live your life radiating that love.” —Mother Teresa

Our latest website resources:

• The dangerous rise of sports gambling: A cultural crisis in the making
• How does a healthy shepherd model rest?
• Kamala Harris will not run for California governor
• Deion Sanders’ most recent struggle transcends football
• What do miracles, sinful lifestyles, and David’s heart for God teach us about faith in today’s world?

Denison Forum

Why climate change may save more lives than it costs

Lee Zeldin, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator, announced earlier this week what he described as “the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States.” The new ruling argues that Congress has not given the EPA the necessary authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, methane from oil and gas companies, or a host of other pollutants.

The shift stands in contrast to how the EPA has approached these issues since the Clean Air Act ostensibly established a legal basis for such regulation back in 2009. However, the basis for that law was the “endangerment finding,” which argued that greenhouse gases represent a sufficiently large threat to public health and welfare to necessitate government intervention. Zeldin and his team are questioning that conclusion.

Given the way government agencies typically function, it may seem odd for one to actively try to limit the scope of its authority. However, shortly after his nomination to lead the EPA, Zeldin stated that his goal was to drive “a dagger through the heart of climate-change religion” by going after the regulations used to support it.

And this is hardly the first time that conservatives—or even President Trump—have sought to chip away at these protocols. During his first term, Trump undid many of the regulations from Obama’s tenure in the Oval Office, only to see them reinstated by Biden. However, if the endangerment finding were overturned, then it would be far more difficult for future presidents to do the same.

But while Zeldin and others in the administration have argued the cost of these regulations outpaces the environmental gains, their primary focus is less on the science behind climate change and more on the argument that Congress took shortcuts in granting regulatory powers to the EPA in the first place. Largely avoiding the quagmire of debate around shifting temperatures and humanity’s impact is seen as an easier path to deregulation.

Whether that assessment proves accurate will be for the courts to decide, but the attempt has sparked fresh debate over both climate change in general and the government’s role in combating it more specifically. And when it comes to that debate, relying on facts over narratives is essential.

To that end, I found a recent article by Jonah Goldberg in The Dispatch to be particularly helpful.

Data-driven or agenda-driven?

In his article, Goldberg argues that—at least in the short to intermediate term—climate change may actually save more lives than it costs. He points to how, in Europe, for example, 8.3 times more people die from cold weather than from heat. If that fact is surprising, it may be because heat-related deaths get nine times more media coverage.

Goldberg is quick to clarify: “I think climate change is real and a problem—even if I think it is also overhyped and used to justify a political and economic agenda that is not entirely about dealing with the problem. So I don’t want to be too dismissive.”

However, he goes on to point out that these changes manifest more in the form of warmer winters than hotter summers, which could lead to greater crop yields, faster reforestation, and fewer cold-related deaths. Moreover, carbon emissions from heating are four times greater than the emissions from air conditioning, meaning that colder climates exacerbate the problem far more than warmer ones.

Yet, despite those factors, many continue to focus only on climate change’s potential consequences—many of which are both real and troubling—while ignoring the possible benefits. And this trend is seen most clearly in Europe, where the rising temperatures have proved particularly painful because the people there are often ill-equipped to handle them.

In Switzerland, for example, government approval is required to install air conditioning. In France, as of a few years ago, roughly three-quarters of all homes were unair-conditioned, and the prevailing narratives throughout their culture aim to keep it that way.

A recent Wall Street Journal article described how “In France, media outlets often warn that cooling a room to more than 15 degrees Fahrenheit below the outside temperature can cause something called ‘thermal shock,’ resulting in nausea, loss of consciousness and even respiratory arrest.”

As someone who has spent most of my life in Texas, I can assure you that is not the case.

But while it is easy to deride claims of “thermal shock” and an ever-evolving list of climate-related doomsday predictions—or their counterparts that claim nothing is actually changing—the truth is that all of us are tempted at times to downplay the truth when it proves inconvenient to the narrative we would prefer to believe.

And, as Christians, that is a mistake we cannot afford to make.

Itching ears and false teachers

One of the most tragic examples of this mistake in Scripture comes from the scribes and Pharisees who opposed Jesus throughout the Gospels. For the most part, these were well-meaning, well-educated, God-fearing men who dedicated their lives to helping people know how to be right with the Lord.

The problem was that their understanding of what made a person right with God was wrong. So when Jesus came preaching about the need for repentance and looking beyond right actions to focus on getting your heart right, they rejected him.

They built their lives, their ministries, and even their very identities around a false idea, and their dependence upon the lie was so strong that not even God incarnate could correct them.

But while the Pharisees are a famous example of this fault, all of us are prone to the same mistake. Moreover, it is just as damaging to our relationship with God and as easy to fall victim to today as it was two thousand years ago.

Our culture fits well into Paul’s warning that “the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths” (2 Timothy 4:3–4).

Fortunately, the advice that follows is just as relevant as well: “But as for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry” (2 Timothy 4:5). In short, choose what’s true no matter the cost and never waver from our calling to help others do the same.

So, what false narratives are you prone to believing today? Are there any areas of your life where your ears are itching for convenient myths over inconvenient truths?

All of us have our blind spots where we are vulnerable to that temptation. The key is knowing yours and then learning to rely on the Lord to help you choose his reality over one of your own making.

Will you ask for his help in making the right choice today?

Quote of the day:

“The word of God hidden in the heart is a stubborn voice to suppress.” —Billy Graham

Our latest website resources:

• Tariffs, Hulk Hogan, Deion, Forrest Frank & Happy Gilmore 2 thoughts | CB Ep. 30
• Kamala Harris will not run for California governor
• Deion Sanders’ most recent struggle transcends football
• The latest on the Russia earthquake and Pacific tsunamis
• What do miracles, sinful lifestyles, and David’s heart for God teach us about faith in today’s world?

Denison Forum

Five ethical issues and the path to courageous faith

According to the Cleveland Clinic, mitochondrial diseases are “a group of genetic conditions that affect how mitochondria in your cells produce energy.” They can cause developmental delays in children, profound muscle weakness, hearing loss, blindness, strokes, and heart failure. Those with the worst symptoms die earliest, often before the age of three.

Now there’s a way to prevent the transmission of these diseases to the next generation.

Researchers in the UK reported recently on the birth of eight babies, each of whom was conceived using one sperm and two eggs. They took the combination of the mother and father’s DNA from a fertilized egg with sick mitochondria and inserted it into a surrogate egg with healthy mitochondria stripped of its own DNA. (Think of extracting the yoke from a chicken egg and inserting it into an egg whose yoke had been removed.)

The children produced in this way will avoid the mitochondrial diseases they would otherwise have inherited. What’s not to like about this news?

A good deal, as it turns out.

Five ethical issues

I serve as resident scholar for ethics with one of the largest not-for-profit healthcare systems in the country. In the healthcare context, I understand the appeal of this procedure. If we could remove malignant tumors, why not remove diseased mitochondria to produce healthy babies?

However, I see at least five issues with three-parent embryos.

First, the mitochondria from the surrogate eggs transmitted their own DNA to the children. While only 1 percent of the total, this DNA can influence brain development and affect everything from lifespan and height to kidney and liver function, blood counts, and the development of diabetes or multiple sclerosis.

And this means that the children have three genetic parents. What are the ethical implications here?

Second, we should consider the IVF procedures utilized. A large number of embryos are typically created in the lab and tested for viability; those that are not used are frozen or discarded. If you believe life begins at conception, as I do, then you see these unused embryos as human lives and their demise as a form of abortion.

Third, what are the future consequences of babies created from three parents? They will transmit their genetics to their offspring. Is the human race being altered?

Fourth, will this technique lead to customized children? Will the DNA of persons of unusual capacities (intellectual, athletic, etc.) be sought for inclusion in the future? Will this be a form of eugenics?

Fifth, will three-parent babies become the norm for lesbian couples? Using donor sperm, the DNA of one partner could be combined with the mitochondria of the other so that both are the genetic “parents” of their children.

“I don’t believe in heaven and hell”

Three-parent embryos are intended to prevent disease and death caused by genetically inherited diseases. They are an example of the fact that many people today will do nearly anything to avoid death, whatever the moral issues or consequences at stake.

A data researcher recently noted that “over the course of the last century, something has dramatically changed in how our species thinks about life and death.” Studies show that young people drink less, fight less, have less sex, and commit fewer crimes than any generation in recorded history. Healthcare spending is escalating while motorcycle ridership and extreme sports participation are plummeting.

The rise of secularism in our post-Christian culture is a clear factor here. When religious belief declines, this world becomes all there is. As George Clooney famously stated,

I don’t believe in heaven and hell. I don’t know if I believe in God. All I know is that as an individual, I won’t allow this life—the only thing I know to exist—to be wasted.

In this context, I find this comment in Hebrews 2 fascinating: through Jesus’ death, he came to “deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery” (v. 15). Such deliverance transformed his followers, enabling them to embrace missional purpose and significance in this life with no fear of death but only anticipation of reward on its other side.

The fisherman who cowed before a serving girl in fear later stood courageously before the very men who arranged Jesus’ crucifixion (Matthew 26:69–70; Acts 4:5–12). Paul could risk his life for Christ again and again (cf. 2 Corinthians 11:23–33) because he was certain that “for me to live is Christ and to die is gain” (Philippians 1:21).

I have seen pastors in Cuba imperil their families and future to preach God’s word fearlessly. I watched a teenage girl in East Malaysia be baptized in the knowledge that because of her public declaration of faith, she could never go home again. I met a young boy in Singapore whose father beat him for going to church but who continued to live at home because he wanted his family to know about Jesus.

How to “be prepared to live”

Now we have a binary choice. If we are not delivered from the “fear of death,” we will be “subject to lifelong slavery” to it. We will choose sins of commission that promise temporal benefits with no concern for their eternal consequences (cf. Mark 7:20–23). We will also choose sins of omission by refusing to sacrifice in the present for the sake of our witness and our Lord (cf. James 4:17).

However, as Jesus warned, “Everyone who practices sin is a slave to sin” (John 8:34). When we fear our death more than we fear our Lord, avoiding death becomes our lord.

Our other choice is to trust our fear of death to Jesus, asking to be freed from slavery to it and empowered to live courageously for him. Then, when such fear strikes, we can “be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might” (Ephesians 6:10; cf. Isaiah 41:13). We can claim Jesus’ promise, “Everyone who lives and believes in me shall never die” (John 11:26).

We can embrace the logic of missionary Jim Elliot’s famous declaration, “He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose.” And we will learn to agree with Charles Spurgeon’s assertion:

“To be prepared to die is to be prepared to live.”

Are you “prepared to live” today?

Quote for the day:

“All the glories of midday are eclipsed by the marvels of sunset.” —Charles Spurgeon

Our latest website resources:

• The death of Hulk Hogan and the transforming power of faith
• A proper revival for “The Fantastic Four”
• What does the Bible say about physical health? Five biblical suggestions
• Following Christ in a sports-obsessed world
• For pastors: An antidote to cultural discouragement

Denison Forum

Does your health matter to God? Every year, millions of people make goals to get healthy and/or lose weight. Dieting is a billion-dollar industry. As of December 2024, around 55% of Americans try to lose weight, though only 27% are actively trying. Meanwhile, the prevalence of obesity remains high—40.3% of American adults are classified as obese, including 9.4% with severe obesity (CDC, 2023 cycle).

There is no shortage of information on how to improve your health. It takes a simple Google search to find the latest science on how movement and nutrition impacts your health. Every health expert has an opinion. Every nutritionist and personal trainer has the “magic cure” to our health goals.

But what does the Bible have to say about the importance of physical health for believers?

Does your physical health and how you take care of it matter to God?

The idolatry of eating—and dieting

Your body was made intricately and deliberately. You are not just a physical being; you are a three-in-one creation. Your heavenly Father was purposeful about his creation.

So many of your internal processes are connected to one another. When you are mentally nervous, you may experience the sensation of physical “butterflies” in your stomach. That is your brain talking to your gut via the vagus nerve. When you choose to be grateful, you can decrease the amount of the stress hormone cortisol being pumped into your bloodstream.

So much of what you think and how you think affects the physical processing in your body. (In fact, your thinking plays a central role in your mental health as well. Read Dr. Lane Ogden’s article, “What does the Bible say about mental health?” for more.) That is on purpose. It is all part of the beautiful design that makes us human.

In 1 Corinthians 6:19–20, the Apostle Paul says that “your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you. . . . so glorify God in your body.” This verse is a reminder of two things.

One, your purpose is to glorify your Creator.

Two, how you take care of your temple can be an external manifestation of glorifying God. It is another aspect of stewarding what you have been entrusted with here on earth. How you steward what you’re given matters; Jesus devoted many parables to this topic.

I often find that there are two types of people, two extremes, when it comes to this issue of taking care of our temples.

On one hand, there are those who are overly vigilant about their health. They exercise every chance they get, monitor every bite that goes into their mouth, and worry about fat, calories, sugar, and whatever else is currently being demonized by the nutrition world.

On the other hand, there are those who have no self-control or mindfulness when it comes to eating. They consume more than necessary in order to cope with stress and unpleasant emotions.

Neither perspective is healthy.

One turns optimal health into an idol. The other elevates food and the act of eating to a level of idolatry in the form of gluttony and/or addiction. Both extremes are dangerous.

If you say food is only for fuel and for nourishing your health, you will miss out on the enjoyment that can be had in food during times of celebration or when you need comfort. If you only choose food as comfort or a coping mechanism, you’ll miss an opportunity to turn to your heavenly Father as the true source of comfort and healing.

What does the Bible say about eating?

When you look to the Bible for examples of how to eat and enjoy your food, it is clear that food is a gift that brings pleasure, but the mindset you have about your food is also important.

For example:

• “Go, eat your bread with joy, and drink your wine with a merry heart, for God has already approved what you do.” (Ecclesiastes 9:7)
• “Better is a dinner of herbs where love is than a fattened ox and hatred with it.” (Proverbs 15:17)
• “Food will not commend us to God. We are no worse off if we do not eat, and no better off if we do.” (1 Corinthians 8:8)
• “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.” (Matthew 4:4)
• “All things are lawful, but not all things are helpful.” (1 Corinthians 10:23)

From these verses, we can see that what we consume may not be an issue of morality, but how and why we consume it can be.

This lines up with the biological processes that occur in your body when you’re eating. When you’re in a state of gratitude and peace, your body digests food better. When you’re stressed or in a state of “fight or flight,” your body will shut down important processes, like digestion, in order to survive the stressor.

Stressing about your physical health, what you’re eating, or talking about “good” or “bad” food, affects the way you digest and use the nutrients you’re provided. I often say, “A body in stress will not digest.” When you turn to food as an idol, whether to see it as a savior or to soothe emotional pain, you don’t just hinder your spiritual growth. It impacts your physical health as well.

Two questions to ask yourself about your physical health

As believers, we have freedom as to what we consume and how we move our bodies. Within freedom, we have choices. There is a way to find balance in our healthy resolutions and learn to steward our physical bodies in a way that honors God.

When you feel well, you serve well. You are able to have the physical and emotional energy to do what God has called you to do. Thanks to many increasing studies on the gut-brain axis, we know that what we eat impacts our mental health and how we think—and how we think impacts every single thing we do.

This new year, instead of asking questions about what diet you should start or what eating or fitness plan you need to implement, ask the following questions:

1. How can I honor my temple without turning it into an idol?
2. How can I receive food with thanksgiving and work to restore my physical health this year without unhealthy extremes or obsession?

Five suggestions for better “temple” care

First, unprocess your diet.

God knew what he was doing when he gave us everything we needed on this earth for physical nourishment. When you consume food that is as close to its whole food source as possible, your body digests it better.

My advice? Start with five different vegetables a day.

How can you introduce more greens and more colorful items like broccoli, bell peppers, tomatoes, or squashes? When you overconsume processed foods that have been chemically altered to be more palatable or addictive (like chips, bars, and candy), you may often lose your taste for food in its natural state. You can hijack the pleasure response in your brain so that you’re constantly desiring that “hit” of sugar or processed carbohydrates that make you feel so good in the short term but can be harmful for your body in the long term.

Second, listen to the body you’ve been given.

When you chronically overeat and use food as emotional comfort, you can alter hunger hormones that help your sense of hunger or fullness. You can also warp your natural hunger hormones by adhering to strict food rules that cause you to put all your trust in some magical, one-size-fits-all plan for eating. You may overcomplicate eating and obsess over what you are or are not having. You may often take on the “last supper mentality” and eat everything in sight before starting a new eating plan because you worry that you will not get to experience pleasure from your food in the future.

Instead, let’s acknowledge that we have been given “everything we need for a godly life” (2 Peter 1:3 NIV). Trust God’s provision for you through the food you have available to nourish you and the many processes he has given you to listen to your body’s cues for fullness and digestion.

Third, be grateful.

Be mindful when you’re eating. Take time to breathe between bites and chew your food longer to help activate the digestion process. Stop stressing over the bread and start obsessing over the Bread of Life. We were not given food to replace our relationship with Jesus. Your faith in the next nutrition plan should never outweigh your faith in the Lord’s nourishment.

Fourth, make movement an act of worship.

Go on a prayer walk. Add in joyful movement, not because you have to, or because you feel forced to start a new workout routine, or because you need punishment for eating food you feel guilty about, but as another act of gratitude for the body you have.

Plenty of physical benefits come from movement, but my favorite side effect is an increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Through BDNF, you can impact the growth of new pathways in the brain, repair aging cells, and protect healthy cells. When you have higher levels of BDNF in your brain, you can think more clearly, and you are even less likely to become depressed. It’s another example of the beautiful way God created our physical bodies to impact our mental and spiritual health.

Finally, ask the Holy Spirit to lead you to healthy habits that will strengthen your body and make you fit to serve his kingdom, however that looks for you as a unique individual.

Ask him to show you where you are making your health into an idol or maybe where you need to make it more of a priority. Ask him to lead you to people, resources, and information that will guide you along on your journey in the new year.

The answer to “does my health matter to God” becomes evident when we look to the Bible. My prayer for you is the same as Paul’s for the Thessalonian church two millennia ago: “May God Himself, the God who makes everything holy and whole, put you together—spirit, soul, and body—and keep you fit for the coming of our master, Jesus Christ” (1 Thessalonians 5:23 MSG).

Related articles:

• “A Christian response to ‘living my truth,’” Erin Kerry
• “How to practice biblical self-care,” Erin Kerry
• “Does the Bible say being anxious is bad?,” Erin Kerry
• “How does a healthy shepherd model rest?,” Erin Kerry
• “What does the Bible say about mental health,” Dr. Lane Ogden

Denison Forum

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte have filed a US defamation lawsuit against an influencer and podcaster who has said France’s first lady “is in fact a man.” The 218-page lawsuit, filed in Delaware yesterday, accuses Candace Owens of publishing “outlandish, defamatory, and far-fetched fictions,” among them the claim that Brigitte Macron was born male under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux.

According to the court filing, Owens has also said that the French president and his wife are blood relatives and that Emmanuel Macron is a product of a CIA human experiment or a “similar government mind control program.” People have viewed Owens’s series, Becoming Brigitte, more than 2.3 million times on YouTube.

I, however, am not one of them.

Prior to seeing this story, I had no idea about these allegations. Now, because of the Macrons’ lawsuit, I know about Owens and her assertions on a level I assume the Macrons would wish I did not.

If they remained silent, however, their decision not to defend themselves could be interpreted as a lack of defense. And choosing not to hold their accuser accountable could only embolden and escalate such accusations.

This is the conundrum of digital media. The good news is that this issue leads to news that is good in a new way today.

The “tragedy of modern man” may surprise you

I am old enough to remember when publishing any content required a publisher who would employ fact-checkers and editors before publication.

Years ago, for example, I wrote a book on the most challenging intellectual issues of our day. Included were four chapters on what happens to those who never hear the gospel. My editor insisted on reducing these four chapters into one. This was frustrating for me because this was my book, but she understood her publishers’ audience and correctly knew that I had written more than they would care to read on the subject.

That was then, this is now. I could write anything in this article that I wish, since our ministry owns this platform and can produce what we choose to produce. We don’t do this, of course—my editor is brilliant not only at copy proofing and fact-checking but also at noting any content she finds questionable. And our mission is to provide biblical responses to cultural issues rather than personal commentary or partisan opinion, a calling to which our board holds us accountable.

But my point is that anyone with internet access can now produce content that others can read, hear, or see, no matter how truthful or untruthful it might be.

Artificial intelligence is already making this situation even worse. Because it collates and summarizes online content in answering queries, it depends on the algorithms and analytics with which it has been programmed. And since the ideological positions of many media companies are clearly progressive, AI-generated content often follows suit.

None of this would be what it is if our culture had not decided long before the advent of the internet that truth is itself personal and subjective. Now we have jettisoned not only objective truth but the quest for objective meaning that depends upon it.

As Os Guinness observed, “The tragedy of modern man is not that he knows less and less about the meaning of his own life, but that it bothers him less and less.”

God will lead us “where we should want to go”

All of this makes the authority of Scripture and the interpretive power of the Holy Spirit wonderful news in new ways.

For much of Christian history, truth was understood to be the product of the Catholic Church’s doctrines as they interpreted the Bible, church tradition, and papal statements. The Reformation narrowed the focus of truth to sola Scriptura (“only the Scriptures”) as our supreme authority and embraced the “priesthood of all believers” as the Spirit leads us to biblical truth.

Now, however, we have shifted from “all truth is God’s truth” to “all truth is your truth.”

Nothing could be more disorienting for humans and for society at large. No wonder anxiety, depression, loneliness, and suicide rates are so high while trust in our core institutions is so low. We have a cultural case of vestibular dysfunction whereby the central nervous system of society fails to process correctly the information of our lives, leaving us dizzy and confused.

But it doesn’t have to be this way. As C. S. Lewis noted, God will lead us “where we should want to go if we knew what we wanted.”

We can access the omniscient wisdom of Almighty God any time we read and obey his word in the leading and empowering of his Spirit. We can be transformed into the character of Jesus so completely that we manifest his holiness in our broken world (Romans 8:29). We can live the abundant life of Christ so fully that in every circumstance “we are more than conquerors through him who loved us” (John 10:10; Romans 8:37).

All of this is what God wants for every one of us. Holistic holiness and victorious Christian living constitute what Watchman Nee called the “normal Christian life.”

“The one marvelous secret of a holy life”

My fear is that you and I will settle for vestibular dysfunction as our cultural norm. Like a person whose vision gradually fails until their world dims without their conscious knowledge, we can shrug our spiritual shoulders at the sexual sin and moral confusion that pervades popular media and contemporary society.

This week, my wife and I watched a detective series on television in which the protagonist sleeps with the neighborhood lifeguard whenever she gets depressed. It bothered me when I realized that this did not bother me.

The English philosopher John Stuart Mill observed, “Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends than that good men should look on and do nothing.” This is true not just of our society but of our souls.

So, let’s settle for nothing less than the holistic holiness of Jesus in the transforming power of the Spirit. Our Lord was adamant: “It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing” (John 6:63 NASB). When we yield to his sanctifying power, we experience what Oswald Chambers called “the one marvelous secret of a holy life,” which “lies not in imitating Jesus, but in letting the perfections of Jesus manifest themselves in my mortal flesh.”

If manifesting the “perfections of Jesus” in your life seems too high a goal, your goal is too low.

Quote for the day:

“Sanctification is not drawing from Jesus the power to be holy; it is drawing from Jesus the holiness that was manifested in him, and he manifests it in me. Sanctification is an impartation, not an imitation.” —Oswald Chambers

Our latest website resources:

• Colbert canceled, theology of Israel, Coldplay cam & a movie star game
• Following Christ in a sports-obsessed world
• In “Talking Back to Purity Culture,” Rachel Joy Welcher takes the purity movement to task for missing the point of biblical sexuality
• Epstein backlash, Christianity is growing, Chip and Joanna Gaines controversy & Scottie Scheffler’s introspection
• A tropical storm, the “Big One,” and a Cascadia tsunami: A paradoxical way to confront our fears in faith

Denison Forum