The El Paso airport was shut down late Tuesday night after the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) fired an anti-drone laser at an object flying near the border. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) ordered all flights grounded and closed the airspace up to eighteen thousand feet for a period of ten days in response. Or at least that was the plan until the FAA reversed course eight hours later and reopened everything.

It was a strange event, and a good bit of digital ink has been spilled in the time since attempting to get to the bottom of what caused the shutdown. As of now, here’s what we know:

• The Department of Defense (DOD) has been testing new anti-drone technology at Fort Bliss, which sits just outside of El Paso, TX.
• The DOD failed to inform the FAA that it would use this technology—a high-powered laser—creating a problem, as anti-drone weapons could potentially affect commercial aircraft that fly in and out of El Paso. Or, at least, that was the fear.
• After the laser was used to target what Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy described as a cartel drone incursion into American airspace—other reports say it was actually just a party balloon—the FAA shut down the airport for ten days.
• The ten-day shutdown appears quite excessive until you consider that the Pentagon and FAA officials were set to meet on February 20—one day before the shutdown was originally scheduled to end—to discuss the safety implications of testing those weapons so close to a commercial airport.
• The Pentagon had previously told the FAA about the lasers and how they planned to use them, but reports indicate the FAA did not receive enough information to be comfortable keeping the airspace open.

So, given those details, what are we to make of their decision, and are we likely to see further shutdowns in the future?

What’s the real problem?

The speed at which the FAA removed the restrictions, coupled with the specific timeframe of the initial closure, makes it sound as though the shutdown was more to get the DOD’s attention than because they truly feared for the safety of the aircraft flying in and out of El Paso. That the FAA neglected to tell either the White House or the Pentagon of its decision further points to safety being a secondary concern.

Continue reading Denison Forum – Why did the government shut down El Paso’s airport? →

Four biblical responses when Christians are stigmatized

Jennifer Welch was an Oklahoma City-based interior designer and reality show actress before launching a podcast in 2022. Titled “I’ve Had It,” her podcast now has 1.5 million subscribers on YouTube and 4.5 million followers across social media. She has interviewed former President Barack Obama, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), then-Vice President Kamala Harris, and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, among many others.

Known for her profane rants against conservatives—she claims the 2024 assassination attempt on President Trump was “totally staged,” for example—she has now turned her ire on evangelicals.

Bonnie Kristian reports in the Free Press that Welch recently called us “the worst people in our country” and said in May, “I detest, with every molecule . . . in my being, evangelical Christianity. I think it is a dumb factory.”

Welch claims that “evangelical Christianity is the biggest racket on the planet” and repeatedly uses the epithet “cancer” to describe us. In her view, “Until we start dealing with this horrific cancer that is white evangelical Christianity in this country, we’re going to continue to have these problems.”

Kristian notes that “scorn heaped on evangelicals is not new.” She cites Yale University legal scholar Stephen L. Carter, who wrote in 1994 that secular progressives saw evangelicals as “wide-eyed zealots.”

Political scientist Ryan Burge explains: “People on the left side of the political spectrum need an enemy. They need to personify what the other side is, and because white evangelicals are so prominent in America, they have become the totem for all the liberal ire against conservatives in America.”

As corrosive to the common good as Welch’s rhetoric is, it is also a signal of something even more systemic, a trend we must recognize clearly so we can respond redemptively.

The four-part strategy continues

My wife and I watched a television show this week in which one of the female characters develops a romantic relationship with another woman. The other characters respond with delight that their colleague has finally “found someone” and hope their relationship lasts.

I was reminded again of the LGBTQ strategy that has been developed and followed over recent decades: normalize unbiblical immorality, legalize it, stigmatize those who disagree, and criminalize such disagreement.

However, the apparent chronological staging of this strategy is deceptive. Those who follow it will continue their efforts to normalize such immorality until they convince us that it is not immoral. Many will continue their work to legalize their immorality, as with current efforts to protect and legalize pedophilia. And they will continue stigmatizing those who disagree until there is no one left to disagree, all the while criminalizing such opposition in the service of the first three stages.

Jennifer Welch’s profane diatribes against evangelicals are obviously in the service of the stigmatizing stage. If Dr. Burge is right (and I think he is), we should not assume that there will not be others, or that criminalization of evangelicals who defend biblical morality is not in our future.

Numerous efforts have already been mounted to threaten our religious liberty, as the so-called Equality Act that passed the House twice demonstrates. Christianity Today reports that “across Western Europe, Christians report ‘discrimination and bullying’ and in some instances even ‘loss of employment’ for expressing faith-based opinions in their workplaces.” Some have even faced repercussions for views they expressed in private conversations or posted on private social media accounts.

Of course, such persecution does not begin to rise to the opposition believers face in North Korea, China, Cuba, and parts of the Muslim world. But when evangelicals are so blatantly stigmatized on one of the most popular podcasts in America, we should take note of where things are and where they may be going.

An “anonymous Christian” is a contradiction in terms

At this point, you might be discouraged by what you’ve read. My purpose, however, is just the opposite.

Jesus assured his followers, “Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account” (Matthew 5:11, my emphasis). Our Lord warned us that we would be persecuted just as he was persecuted, which makes sense: those who saw him as a threat would see his followers as a threat. If they opposed him for proclaiming truth, they would oppose his followers for doing the same (cf. Acts 5:17–40).

A simple way out of this, of course, is to be silent about our faith as we hide our beliefs from those who would oppose them. However, an “anonymous Christian” is a contradiction in terms. If a “Christian” is a “Christ imitator” (cf. 1 Corinthians 11:1; 1 John 2:6), we cannot imitate our Lord and be anything but vocal and courageous in speaking his word and advancing his kingdom (cf. Acts 4:19–20).

As a result, the more we are stigmatized for our faith, the more we can know that we are being appropriately public with our biblical beliefs. And the more we can know that Satan himself is using those willing to be used as he fights truth with lies.

Four practical responses

In this sense, it is an odd compliment when someone like Jennifer Welch castigates us so profanely and hatefully. Our response should be to expect such attacks, then to redeem them for God’s glory.

Here’s how the Bible teaches us to respond to those who oppose our faith:

1. “Forgive others their trespasses” (Matthew 6:14), choosing to pardon rather than to punish in the knowledge that we have been forgiven much as well (cf. Luke 7:47).
2. “Pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5:44), recognizing that the more they reject biblical truth, the more they need it.
3. “Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you” (Luke 6:27), seeking tangible ways to meet their needs so as to earn the right to share Christ with them.
4. “Be strong and courageous” (Joshua 1:9), asking God to help us “continue to speak your word with all boldness” (Acts 4:29).

In all things, we must remember that we are not “culture warriors” for whom people like Jennifer Welch are our enemies, but cultural missionaries for whom they are our mission field. The good news, as my wife writes in her latest blog, is that God’s Spirit can fill us with the same agape love that God’s Son has for us.

Then, as Janet notes, “we can love like Jesus.”

Whom do you know who needs such love today?

Quote for the day:

“The good man has his enemies. He would not be like his Lord if he had not. If we were without enemies, we might fear that we were not the friends of God, for friendship of the world is enmity to God.” —Charles Spurgeon

Our latest website resources:

• Notre Dame professor advocates for abortion: Responding to her argument with scientific facts and a grieving heart
• Transgender care is changing, how should Christians respond?
• How should Christians think about economics, capitalism, and government policy?
• Should churches user AI?
• How to help kids process disturbing news in a digital age

Denison Forum

A man was released from custody early this morning after being detained for questioning in the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie. He said he had been in his car last night when police officers asked him for his name and then detained him. He was held for several hours, he said, before he was released with wrists swollen from handcuffs.

The news came after the FBI released video Tuesday showing a masked person with a handgun holster outside Ms. Guthrie’s front door the night she disappeared.

In other Tuesday headlines, seven people were found dead in a shooting at a high school in Tumbler Ridge, a remote community in British Columbia. Among them was a person believed to be the shooter, who died from an apparent self-inflicted injury.

Another person died while being transported to the hospital from the school; twenty-five people suffered injuries that were not life-threatening. Two other people were found dead in a local residence that police believe is connected to the shooting.

Jefferson, Lincoln, and the “will to power”

Since the Fall, vice has been a feature rather than a bug of human nature. From Cain to today, “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). The two phrases and experiences are connected and causal: “The wicked boasts of the desires of his soul, and the one greedy for gain curses and renounces the Lᴏʀᴅ. In the pride of his face the wicked does not seek him; all his thoughts are, ‘There is no God’” (Psalm 10:3–4).

In reading Joseph J. Ellis’s American Dialogue: The Founders and Us, I found two examples that make the psalmist’s point.

The first concerns Thomas Jefferson, without question one of the most brilliant of our presidents. Yet according to Ellis, Jefferson “regarded it as self-evident that ‘blacks are inferior to whites in the endowments of both mind and body.’” As a result, he could not see an end to slavery: he was convinced that any mixing of blacks and whites would produce an inferior American race, so freed slaves would have to be deported from the US, but Jefferson could not identify a plausible way to do so.

The second concerns Abraham Lincoln, usually ranked by historians as the greatest of our presidents. Yet Ellis reports that he also considered a deportation scheme for freed slaves to be enacted after the Civil War, even dispatching a presidential commission to Panama to explore the viability of a black homeland there.

Both presidents illustrate the perennial fact that the “will to power” inflames and empowers fallen human nature (cf. Genesis 3:5). But Jefferson was right to write: “I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever.”

Is there a way forward?

Ben Sasse on the source of meaning

In a perceptive new Wall Street Journal article, former Sen. Ben Sasse reminds us: “America works only if we remember that government is the source neither of our rights nor the meaning in our lives.” Given that Mr. Sasse is dying of pancreatic cancer, his wisdom resonates with particular urgency.

He is right: If our hope lies within us, we have no real hope. But if we will use the discouragements of the news and our culture to turn from ourselves to our redeeming Lord, he will do in us what we cannot do in ourselves.

While “the heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick” (Jeremiah 17:9), our Maker will give us a spiritual heart transplant: “I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you” (Ezekiel 36:26). When we trust Christ as our Lord, we “become children of God” (John 1:12) and a “new creation” as “the old has passed away; behold, the new has come” (2 Corinthians 5:17).

However, if you’re like Paul (and me), you still struggle with temptation: “I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing” (Romans 7:19).

The good news is that there is no sin we must commit (1 Corinthians 10:13). And there is a practical way we can experience “victory through our Lord Jesus Christ” every day (1 Corinthians 15:57).

“We need to reprogram our mind and heart”

In a recent Wisdom for Each Day devotional, Billy Graham likened our minds to computers that are programmed at the factory. Unfortunately, much of what programs us comes from our fallen culture and corrupts us. Dr. Graham therefore advised that “we need to reprogram our mind and heart; we need to replace the bad things that have taken root there with good and true things.”

The key is the word “replace.”

Years ago, New York Times columnist David Brooks wrote an important article titled “How People Change.” He cited a “trove of research suggesting that it’s best to tackle negative behaviors obliquely, by redirecting attention toward different, positive ones.”

Erasmus (c. 1469–1536) had similar advice, encouraging us to use temptation as an opportunity to trust more fully in God’s power to defeat it. He noted that Satan hates nothing so much as for evil to be used for good.

In practical terms:

• When we see something in the news that discourages us, pray for those involved. Ask Jesus to make himself real to them. Pray for God to use his people to make a difference where they have influence. Ask the Spirit to replace our fear with the “peace of God, which surpasses all understanding,” knowing that it “will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4:7).

• When we face temptation, pray for the strength and wisdom to replace sin with godliness. Identify a positive action that would benefit us and others. Then ask Jesus to make himself real to us as he empowers us to be “more than conquerors through him who loved us” (Romans 8:37).

The key is both simple and profound:

“Beholding the glory of the Lord, [we] are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another” (2 Corinthians 3:18).

How fully will you be “transformed” into your Father’s image today?

Quote for the day:

“Be killing sin, or it will be killing you.” —John Owen (1616–83)

Our latest website resources:

• Transgender care is changing, how should Christians respond?
• How to help kids process disturbing news in a digital age
• Bad Bunny, the Grammys, Super Bowl outrage, Don Lemon arrest & Epstein update
• White House video depicts the Obamas as primates: A biblical and personal response
• Who is Jelly Roll? The rapper-turned-country artist shares his faith at the Grammys

Denison Forum