Tag Archives: Denison Forum

Denison Forum – President Trump announces two-week ceasefire in Iran war

 

President Trump announced on Truth Social late yesterday afternoon that he would “suspend the bombing and attack of Iran for a period of two weeks” subject to Iran’s “agreeing to the complete, immediate, and safe opening of the Strait of Hormuz.” He added that the US is “very far along with a  definitive agreement concerning long-term peace with Iran, and peace in the Middle East,” and stated that a “two-week period will allow the agreement to be finalized and consummated.”

Mr. Trump’s announcement delayed what he had warned would be an attack that would cause “a whole civilization” to “die tonight, never to be brought back again.”

Seyed Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, responded with a statement on behalf of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council: “If attacks against Iran are halted, our powerful armed forces will cease their defensive operations. For a period of two weeks, safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz will be possible via coordination with Iran’s armed forces and with due consideration of technical limitations.”

This is obviously good news for the people of Iran and for those in neighboring states whom Tehran had threatened to attack if attacked by the US. Stock futures in the US surged over a thousand points this morning, while oil plunged.

Continue reading Denison Forum – President Trump announces two-week ceasefire in Iran war →

Denison Forum – Artemis 2 is “returning to a planet they have cheered up”

 

The path to sustaining hope in uncertain times

The Artemis 2 crew is scheduled to return to Earth tomorrow, splashing down off the coast of San Diego, California, around 8:07 p.m. ET. As the Economist reports, they are “returning to a planet they have cheered up.”

From traveling further into space than any humans before, to naming an unrecorded moon crater for the mission commander’s late wife, to picturing an astronaut silhouetted by a luminous view of Earth, the article notes that “emotion, in the capsule and among millions watching from the ground, has been a significant part of the whole affair.”

We have needed to be “cheered up,” to be sure.

“A stunning advance in artificial intelligence”

The two-week ceasefire with Iran announced on April 7 postponed what the Wall Street Journal called the “threat [that] gripped the world.” However, Iran stopped oil tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz yesterday in response to Israel’s strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon. President Trump stated that Lebanon was not part of the truce agreement, but Vice President JD Vance is now affirming that Israel will rein in its attacks to preserve the ceasefire.

Continue reading Denison Forum – Artemis 2 is “returning to a planet they have cheered up” →

Denison Forum – Artemis 2 pilot: There are no atheists “on top of rockets”

 

Four astronauts aboard Artemis 2 are on their way home this morning. They broke the record for human travel on Monday afternoon, flying more than 248,655 miles from Earth and surpassing NASA’s Apollo 13 mission in 1970. Orion flew behind the moon last night, losing communications with our planet for forty minutes while reaching its maximum distance from our planet, 252,756 miles away.

Commander Reid Wiseman told President Trump, “We saw sights that no human has ever seen.”

The crewmembers are sharing a cabin roughly the size of two minivans. They sleep in bags attached to the wall of the craft, exercise on a flywheel machine, and share a toilet (with private doors). Their flight is historic not only for its distance into space but for the composition of their crew, which includes the first woman, the first Canadian, and the first Black astronaut to travel to the moon.

Continue reading Denison Forum – Artemis 2 pilot: There are no atheists “on top of rockets” →

Denison Forum – “A Great Awakening” and the future of America

 

The movie A Great Awakening is in theatres and sparking great interest in the historical story it tells. While primarily focusing on the unlikely partnership between Benjamin Franklin and George Whitefield (to be explained below), it also portrays a mighty spiritual movement instrumental to the founding of our nation.

The First Great Awakening (sometimes simply called “The Great Awakening”) is typically dated from 1735 to 1743, though its effects lasted long in the nation it helped to birth.

The awakening began amid a dire spiritual crisis in the colonies. Not one in twenty people claimed to be a Christian. Samuel Blair, a pastor of the day, said religion lay as it were dying and ready to expire its last breath of life.

But Theodore Frelinghuysen, a Dutch Reformed minister who had come to the New World from Holland in 1720, would not give up on his adopted homeland. He began praying fervently for revival to come to the colonies, first with himself and his church, and then with his larger community. Others joined his fledgling prayer movement. The Spirit began to move.

As a Harvard student during the First Great Awakening wrote, “There is a great and glorious work of the Spirit of God among us.”

Two preachers are especially identified with this “work.”

Jonathan Edwards and the wrath of God

The first is Jonathan Edwards (1703–58). Edwards’ father and grandfather were both pastors. After rigorous homeschooling, he entered Yale College at the age of thirteen and later became a tutor there.

Edwards is widely considered the greatest theologian America has produced. He was an intellectual recluse who studied twelve hours a day and read his sermons, face buried in his manuscript. When he experienced the anointing and power of God, however, his sermons took on an electrifying capacity to lead hearers to repentance.

His most famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” was printed and widely circulated throughout the area. One passage reads:

The wrath of God burns against [sinners], their damnation does not slumber; the pit is prepared, the fire is made ready, the furnace is now hot, ready to receive them; the flames do now rage and glow. The glittering sword is whet, and held over them, and the pit hath opened her mouth under them.

In another, he warned sinners of the urgency of repentance:

The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked: his wrath towards you burns like fire; he looks upon you as worthy of nothing else, but to be cast into the fire; he is of purer eyes than to bear to have you in his sight; you are ten thousand times more abominable in his eyes, than the most hateful venomous serpent is in ours. . . . There is no other reason to be given, why you have not dropped into hell since you arose in the morning, but that God’s hand has held you up.

Edwards’ message awakened many who thought their church affiliation was sufficient for their salvation, transcending denominational boundaries to help spark a transforming spiritual movement.

George Whitefield and the attraction of the gospel

The other great preacher of the First Great Awakening was George Whitefield (1714–70). His influence was so massive that Thomas S. Kidd, one of America’s foremost church historians, titled his biography George Whitefield: America’s Spiritual Founding Father.

While a student at Oxford, Whitefield became closely associated with John and Charles Wesley. At their invitation, though only twenty-five at the time, he joined them in their missionary work in the colony of Georgia in 1738. He spent the rest of his life preaching throughout the American colonies and itinerantly in England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland.

In total, he made seven trips to America. He usually woke at 4 a.m. and began to preach at 5 or 6 a.m. In one week, he often preached a dozen times, spending forty or fifty hours in the pulpit.

In the colonies, Whitefield embarked on multiple tours up and down the eastern seaboard. He spoke in churches and outdoors; his voice was so powerful that as many as 30,000 people could hear him. He focused on slaves, Native Americans, and colonists of all social strata. On one occasion, more than 8,000 people in New York City heard him preach (the city’s population was 8,624 at the time).

Whitefield’s theatrical style was unlike anything most in the New World had heard. His preaching electrified his audiences and sparked a massive response to the gospel. Benjamin Franklin noted his appeal and began printing his sermons and promoting his ministry, forming an unlikely partnership that greatly expanded Whitefield’s ministry.

Approximately 80 percent of all American colonists heard him preach at least once. Aside from  British royalty, he was perhaps the only living person whose name would have been known by any colonial American.

Whitefield’s farewell sermon on Boston Commons drew twenty-three thousand people, more than Boston’s entire population and probably the largest crowd that had ever gathered in America.

Calvinism and evangelism

One of the significant distinctives of both Edwards and Whitefield was their strong Calvinistic theology, which emphasized the sovereignty of God in all realms of life. This would seem a deterrent to evangelism, but both believed (as did Charles Spurgeon and many other Calvinists afterwards) that it was rather an incentive: if you are in the elect, when you hear the gospel, you will respond. If you do not respond, that is not the fault of the preacher but the non-elect hearer.

In addition, with regard to salvation, Calvinistic theology emphasized that the elect are saved apart from any works on their part. In a day that defined spirituality by church attendance and personal morality, this message was a powerful incentive to repentance and faith, the acknowledgement that we are utterly lost apart from grace and that receiving grace is our only hope.

Multitudes responded: as a result of this transforming movement, as much as 80 percent of the colonial population became identified with a Christian church.

But many did not. The awakening caused a split between those who followed the evangelical message (the “New Lights”) and those who rejected it (the “Old Lights”). Elite ministers in British America were firmly Old Lights and censured the new revivalism as emotionalism and chaos.

On occasion, they were right. In 1743, an influential New Light minister named James Davenport urged his listeners to burn books. The next day, he encouraged them to burn their clothes as a sign of their casting off the sinful trappings of the fallen world. To set an example, he took off his own pants and threw them into the fire, but a woman saved them and tossed them back to Davenport, telling him he had gone too far.

Uniting the colonies and breaking the bonds of England

The evangelical awakening sparked by the Holy Spirit not only led multitudes to Christ—it also changed the trajectory of the nation America was to become.

Recall that Edwards and Whitefield were strong Calvinists, emphasizing the fact that salvation is by grace apart from any works we can do on our own behalf. This insistence not only led many to repent of their sins and accept such grace but also broke down denominational barriers and helped unite the very disparate colonies in a larger spiritual movement.

Prior to the awakening, the colonies were deeply divided by religious affiliation: the majority of New Englanders belonged to congregational churches, while the Middle Colonies were composed of Quakers, Anglicans, Lutherans, Baptists, Presbyterians, the Dutch Reformed, and Congregationalists. Southern colonists were mostly Anglicans, but there were many Baptists, Presbyterians, and Quakers as well.

However, Edwards and especially Whitefield persuaded many that church membership not only does not save, but religion apart from grace can be a detriment to knowing and following God fully. The awakening helped bridge denominational, social, and economic gaps and was crucial in forging a singular American identity.

The awakening served yet another purpose in colonial America: it convinced many that their liberty was a gift from God, not the British crown.

The Church of England was and is under the titular authority of the British monarch. Its leaders serve at his or her pleasure; its members understand themselves to be under the rule of their secular ruler. The Great Awakening, by bringing multitudes into personal relationship with God apart from clerical or secular authority, helped break this bond with England.

From Awakening to Revolution

The children of the Awakening, therefore, became the soldiers of the Revolution.

Thomas Kidd was right: just as George Washington can be seen as America’s secular founding father, George Whitefield was our spiritual founding father. He and those who worked with him to advance the gospel helped create the nation whose 250th anniversary we celebrate this July.

Now it’s our turn to pick up their torch, to continue preaching the same message that so animated their minds and inflamed their hearts.

If America’s past was dependent on the liberty found only in the gospel, how much more is our future?

 

Denison Forum

Denison Forum – How a US airman was rescued behind enemy lines in Iran

 

Last Friday, an American F-15E fighter jet was hit by incoming fire and crashed inside Iran. One of the two crew members was quickly rescued. According to the Wall Street Journal, what came next was “one of the most complex search-and-rescue efforts for the US Air Force in enemy territory in decades.”

The second airman, a weapons system officer, had ejected and sent a message over his radio, saying, “God is good.” He was injured but hiked up a seven-thousand-foot mountain ridgeline and hid in a crevice. While evading capture, he activated an emergency beacon that allowed US forces to locate him.

Iranian officials issued a public plea for locals to find him, offering a reward of $60,000 (equivalent to a multi-million-dollar salary in the US).  To confuse Iranians in pursuit, CIA operatives spread a false message that both crew members of the downed jet had already been found. US aircraft also dropped bombs on convoys approaching the area where the airman was hiding.

Sunday morning, President Trump announced that the “highly respected colonel” had been rescued and is safe. Mr. Trump plans to speak to reporters about the operation today at 1 p.m. ET.

Why would the US go to such lengths to recover a single pilot?

The answer says much about our nation’s past and our collective future.

Russian soldiers bribe their officers to stay alive

Since Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine began, Russian forces have suffered nearly 1.2 million casualties. Soldiers on the front lines must bribe their officers to avoid being shot by drones or other soldiers, tied to trees to freeze, or denied medical care. Many who refuse to pay are tortured.

During its war with Iraq, Iran marched child soldiers into fields to clear mines and prepare the way for Iranian tanks. In 2016 alone, the Islamic State sent 1,112 Muslims to their deaths in suicide attacks. During World War II, Japan ordered more than 3,800 pilots to fly kamikaze missions.

In the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, the Chinese army killed at least ten thousand of their own citizens. By some estimates, Iranian authorities massacred more than thirty thousand fellow Iranians in last January’s protests.

By contrast, the United States is founded on the creedal conviction that “all men are created equal” and endowed by our Creator with rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. In a world dominated by monarchies, dictatorships, and theocracies, this was a declaration never before embraced by a nation.

What was the source of this insistence on individual liberty?

A great film depicts a great partnership

My wife and I saw A Great Awakening last Friday and highly recommend it to you. The film tells the story of the unlikely friendship between deist Benjamin Franklin and evangelist George Whitefield, a partnership that proved pivotal to America’s founding.

Whitefield preached gospel messages all across the colonies, calling massive crowds to repentance and faith in Christ. Franklin printed, at significant personal profit, Whitefield’s sermons and other materials regarding his ministry.

And, according to Franklin, Whitefield’s message changed the nation that America became.

In one scene, Franklin explains to a British general the colonies’ frustrations with the crown: “Across that ocean, an entire generation of Americans have been awakened to believe that liberty is not a gift given to them by a king, but a right given to them by God.” Years after American independence, as Franklin and his grandson are discussing Whitefield’s work, the grandson asks whether Whitefield played any role in the American Revolution.

Benjamin Franklin replied, “He was the Revolution.”

“They worshiped him, but some doubted”

On this Monday after Easter Sunday, what was Jesus doing? Luke reports that “until the day he was taken up” to heaven, “He presented himself alive to them after his suffering by many proofs, appearing to them during forty days and speaking about the kingdom of God” (Acts 1:2, 3).

“By many proofs” can be literally translated “by a great number of evidences and convincing signs.” Why did Jesus’ followers need such persuasion?

Matthew tells us, “when they saw [the risen Christ] they worshiped him, but some doubted” (Matthew 28:17). This was because, as the brilliant theologian N. T. Wright noted, the concept of a body rising from the dead never to die again was foreign not only to Greek thinkers but to the Jews as well. As a result, even though Jesus frequently predicted his resurrection (cf. Matthew 16:21; 17:23; 20:19), none of his followers expected it.

The women returned to the tomb Sunday morning to finish burying his body (Luke 24:1). When they told the apostles that they had met the risen Christ, “these words seemed to them an idle tale, and they did not believe them” (v. 11). So Jesus delayed his return to paradise until his followers understood his resurrection to be not a myth, legend, or tradition, but a fact that changes everything.

Only when they knew him to be alive and experienced him personally as their Lord could they advance the global mission he intended for them.

“Too legible characters not to be understood”

The same is true today.

George Whitefield reminded colonial Americans, “The fall of man is written in too legible characters not to be understood: Those that deny it, by their denying, prove it.” He also observed, “The sinner can no more raise himself from the deadness of sin than Lazarus, who had been dead four days, until Jesus came.” By contrast, Whitefield declared, “It is God alone who can subdue and govern the unruly wills of sinful men.”

To return to the story with which we began, we are all trapped behind the “lines” of our spiritual enemy and cannot rescue ourselves (Romans 3:23; 5:12). This fact explains the urgency and the grace of Easter.

If, like the early disciples, you doubt the reality of the resurrection, let me encourage you to examine the evidence for yourself. If, however, you believe that Jesus rose from the dead on Easter Sunday, let me ask you: When last did you experience him as your living Lord?

If Jesus is alive in our lives, he can act in ways a dead teacher never could. He can forgive our sins and save our souls. He can heal our bodies and comfort us in our grief. He can empower us by his Spirit and use us for eternal significance. He can set our hearts at liberty and bring our nation to himself.

All Jesus has ever done, he can still do. What he did through his first followers, he can do through you and me this day. But we must experience his risen presence if we are to be catalysts for the change our fallen culture needs so desperately.

George Whitefield was right:

“We can preach the gospel of Christ no further than we have experienced the power of it in our own hearts.”

Have you “experienced the power” of the risen Christ yet today?

Quote for the day:

“Christ is worth all, or he is worth nothing.” —George Whitefield

Our latest website resources:

 

Denison Forum

Denison Forum – How pilots responded when their jet engine erupted in fire

 

A Good Friday reflection

Delta Flight 104, with 272 passengers and 14 crew, had just departed São Paulo/Guarulhos International Airport on Sunday when flames shot out from its left engine. Passengers screamed for the pilots to “turn around” the jet. They immediately declared an emergency, shut down the affected engine, and circled back to the airport, landing safely shortly after departure.

Video from inside the cabin shows passengers erupting into applause and cheers when the aircraft came to a stop. No injuries were reported.

Imagine yourself inside that airplane. If you could speak to the pilots, what would you say to them today? A year from today?

Let’s come back to that thought and its Good Friday relevance in a moment.

I was once given a ticket for what the officer claimed was an illegal left turn. I disagreed, but an attorney convinced me that the chances of winning my argument in court were nil. So I paid a fine and received deferred adjudication. By avoiding another ticket for six months, I also avoided what is known as a “final conviction.”

This was by the grace of my attorney friend. He advised me prior to my hearing, drove me to the courthouse, pled my case before the judge, and negotiated the mercy I received. He would not let me pay him for his time.

What he did not do was die for me.

Imagine that I had committed a capital offense and had been sentenced to death, and that the court somehow allowed my friend to die in my place. In that case, his sacrifice would make logical sense. My penalty was death, so he died to pay it.

However, I was accused of committing an illegal left turn. For my friend to die to pay for my crime would make no logical sense at all.

This episode constitutes the entirety of my experience with our court system. I have never committed murder or otherwise done anything for which the sentence is death.

Why, then, in atoning for my sins, did Jesus have to die for them?

Why do we call this day “Good” Friday?

We call this day of Holy Week “Good Friday,” though I can assure you no one present on that day called it that. The earliest use of the title is in a text from around AD 1290. The Oxford English Dictionary suggests that “good” in this context refers to “a day or season observed as holy by the church.” Others think the title is a version of “God’s Friday.”

Etymology aside, humanity has an excellent reason to call this day “good.”

On this day, Jesus “suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God” (1 Peter 3:18). But why did he have to die to do so?

Sin cuts us off from the holy God who “gives to all mankind life and breath” (Acts 17:25; cf. Psalm 36:9; John 1:4) and leads eventually and ultimately to death (Romans 6:23). If you cut a flower from its roots, the flower will die.

The “debt” incurred by sin, therefore, must be paid by death—either ours or someone else’s on our behalf. But since every other human (except Jesus) has sinned as we have, they have their own debt to pay and cannot also pay ours (cf. Romans 3:23). If I have $100 and owe $100, I cannot use my money to pay your debt as well.

This is one reason the Gospels so adamantly demonstrate Jesus’ innocence with regard to his trials and conviction (cf. Luke 23:14–15; John 18:38). If he had committed sin, his death could not pay for our sins. But because he was “tempted as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15), he had no debt of his own to pay and thus could pay ours.

“God’s love and justice came together”

However, there was another option: Why could God not simply forgive our debt?

If you run into my car on the street, I can forgive you without requiring your death or even that you pay for the damages. Similarly, the judge in my case had the power to dismiss all charges. If he wished, he could simply have forgiven me for my alleged misdeeds.

But he could not do so and do his job. The policeman who issued my ticket was as convinced of my guilt as I was of my innocence. The judge had no way to satisfy the demands of justice while ignoring or forgiving my legal debt.

The Bible says that God is both love (1 John 4:8) and holy (Isaiah 6:3; Revelation 4:8). With regard to our sins, how is he to be both? Billy Graham expressed God’s quandary this way:

If God were simply to forgive our sins without judging them, then there would be no justice, no accountability for wrongdoing. God would not be truly holy and just.

But if God were simply to judge us for our sins as we deserve, there would be no hope of salvation for any of us. His love would have failed to provide what we need.

Dr. Graham explained the answer: “The cross is the only way to resolve the problem of sin. At the cross, God’s love and justice came together.”

If the judge in my case had pronounced me guilty and then paid the fine himself, he would have been loving and just. There was no other logical way for him to be both.

“Unless there is a Good Friday in your life”

Imagine that someone died physically in your place. Perhaps a soldier shielded you from a grenade that would have killed you, or a police officer stepped in front of a bullet meant for you. Would you go a day of your life without remembering their sacrifice? If they somehow came back to life, what would you do to express your gratitude to them?

Bishop Fulton J. Sheen noted,

“Unless there is a Good Friday in your life, there can be no Easter Sunday.”

You and I will have all of eternity to thank Jesus for this day.

But remember, eternity starts today.

Quote for the day:

“If we want to know what God is like, let us look at Calvary.” —Robert E. Coleman

Our latest website resources:

 

Denison Forum

Denison Forum – Why young adults believe revival is coming to America

 

A Maundy Thursday reflection

Yesterday was filled with headline news, including:

  • Donald Trump became the first sitting US president to attend oral arguments at the Supreme Court as the justices considered the question of birthright citizenship.
  • NASA’s Artemis II mission to circle the moon launched last night at 6:35 p.m. ET. Watching the rocket lift off from Kennedy Space Center in Florida was awe-inspiring.
  • President Trump addressed the nation last night, stating that the United States’ “core strategic objectives” in Iran are “nearing completion” a month after Operation Epic Fury began.

However, I want to focus on this Maundy Thursday on news that isn’t making headlines in our culture but is being celebrated in heaven.

Recent studies show that eighty million Americans believe a spiritual revival is coming to our nation. Of those participating in the survey, young adults (statistically the most unchurched generation in history) are surprisingly the most likely to agree.

A story I read this week shows why.

 “I never knew God loved me”

Jennie Allen is a New York Times bestselling author and founder of IF:Gathering and Gather25, part of what Christian Post describes as a “vision to mobilize the global Church.” According to the article, she has been visiting college campuses with the Unite ministry and was invited to speak at Southeastern University in Florida last month.

The Dallas-based Bible teacher said, “We have been blessed to be on the road on about twenty campuses. And we have seen over and over again a huge response to repentance, to the gospel, to baptism, and it’s just been beautiful and amazing.”

This was especially true at Southeastern. After her message, she said, “The room did confession, which I’ve done in many rooms before. But a girl yelled out ‘abortion’ as loud as she could.” The student then collapsed to the floor. “I think after that, it got real,” Allen said. “Everyone began saying things that were harder to say.”

The gathering continued for hours and eventually days, with students staying for worship and prayer late into the night.

Allen, a mother of four, said she’s personally baptized hundreds of students over the past two and a half years. According to her, the desperation many young people feel is fueling their spiritual openness. She recalled, “A seven-foot athlete stood in front of me with tears falling down his face and said, ‘I never knew God loved me.’”

Gen Z’s faith gives her hope for the future of the church. “They’re so compelled by the love of God that they want to make a difference,” she said. “Jesus changed their life, and they want other people to experience that too.”

“As the bridegroom rejoices over the bride”

Maundy Thursday was one of the most pivotal days in history. On this night, Jesus washed the feet of his disciples, prayed in the Garden of Gethsemane, surrendered to the soldiers, and was illegally tried and condemned by the Sanhedrin. The next day, he would be crucified.

But one part of what transpired then has riveted my attention today. As you know, Jesus shared what we call the “Last Supper” with his disciples on this day (Matthew 26:26–29). This is the phrase that caught my eye: “Drink of it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant . . .” (vv. 27–28, my emphasis).

Remember who was at the table with Jesus that night: Judas, who would betray him, Peter, who would deny him, and nine other “disciples” who would abandon him. Only John would be present with him at the cross. The rest would fail him in his hour of greatest need.

Yet, astonishingly, he included them all in the Supper that symbolized his body and blood given for them. And, just as astonishingly, he includes us as well. All of us. Any of us who know him as Lord will be with him at his table in paradise.

Isaiah saw a day when “the Lᴏʀᴅ of hosts will make for all peoples a feast of rich food,” a day when “he will swallow up death forever” and “wipe away tears from all faces” (Isaiah 25:6, 8). On that day, Jesus said, “many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 8:11). He compared this event to “a king who gave a wedding feast for his son” (Matthew 22:2; cf. Luke 14:16).

Now comes the most amazing part: at “the marriage supper of the Lamb,” the bride is us (Revelation 19:7, 9).

Jesus is “the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). Now, as “a bride adorned for her husband” (Revelation 21:2), we are “the bride, the wife of the Lamb” (v. 9; cf. 2 Corinthians 11:2). And “as the bridegroom rejoices over the bride, so shall your God rejoice over you” (Isaiah 62:5).

“The core truth of our existence”

Here’s my point: Your Savior loves you as passionately and unconditionally as a perfect husband would love his wife.

When you said “I do” to him as your Savior and Lord, you became his “bride.” Nothing can change your status as his beloved. Nothing can make him love you any more or any less than he did when he died for you. You are loved as you are, no matter what you do or do not do today.

Unfortunately, everything in our culture conditions us to believe the opposite about ourselves. If you are a student, your progress depends on your grades. If you have a job, your income depends on how well you do it. If you’re an athlete, a musician, a painter, an actor, or a writer (in my case), your success depends on your performance. Even your family is not exempt from transactionalism: your spouse can divorce you, your children can disown you, and your parents can disinherit you.

By contrast, as Henri Nouwen wrote in his marvelous book Life of the Beloved: Spiritual Living in a Secular World:

The world tells you many lies about who you are, and you simply have to be realistic enough to remind yourself of this. Every time you feel hurt, offended, or rejected, you have to dare to say to yourself: “These feelings, strong as they may be, are not telling me the truth about myself. The truth, even though I cannot feel it right now, is that I am the chosen child of God, precious in God’s eyes, called the Beloved from all eternity.”

Nouwen assured us that “being the Beloved expresses the core truth of our existence.” And he added:

“That is the spiritual life: the chance to say ‘Yes’ to our inner truth. The spiritual life, thus understood, radically changes everything.”

Will you say yes to your “inner truth” today?

Quote for the day:

“When we keep claiming the light, we will find ourselves becoming more and more radiant.” —Henri Nouwen

Our latest website resources:

 

Denison Forum

Denison Forum – Supreme Court rules against ban on “conversion therapy”

 

A Holy Wednesday reflection

The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Colorado’s ban on LGBTQ “conversion therapy” for young people infringes on the free speech rights of a Christian counselor. Their ruling reversed a lower court’s decision that had upheld the law.

According to Associated Press, “The justices agreed that the law raises free speech concerns and sent it back to a lower court to decide if it meets a legal standard that few laws pass.” Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the court, said the law “censors speech based on viewpoint” and added that the First Amendment “stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country.”

Notably, the Court ruled eight-to-one, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson the lone dissenter.

However, the news is not all positive on the religious liberty front. The Family Research Council has documented 1,384 “acts of hostility toward US churches” occurring between January 2018 and December 2024. Catholic churches have especially come under attack in this country.

In the Middle East, the Hoover Institution reports that Christianity is declining rapidly due to the persecution of believers. In Finland, a member of the Parliament and a Lutheran Church bishop were convicted for writing and publishing a pamphlet twenty years ago defending biblical sexual morality. In India, Christian groups are speaking out against legislation they say could enable the government to seize their properties.

Continue reading Denison Forum – Supreme Court rules against ban on “conversion therapy” →

Denison Forum – “Morons Are Governing America” vs. “Trump Was Right About Everything”

 

A Holy Tuesday reflection

My wife and I drove past a “No Kings” rally in our city last Saturday, where we saw a sign that said, “Be kind!” Another announced in rainbow colors, “Love wins!” Next to them, paradoxically, a man was waving his hand-lettered whiteboard, “[expletive deleted] Trump!”

Not to be partisan, but signs using a euphemism for the same expletive abounded when Joe Biden was president.

This bipolarity is reflected and empowered by the media daily. If a new article in the Atlantic is to be believed, America under Donald Trump is now a “rogue superpower.” However, if a recent editorial in Fox News is correct, “Trump is breaking Middle East’s old power structure” in ways that will produce more positive geopolitical alignments in the future.

You can buy a yard sign displaying a MAGA acrostic, “Morons Are Governing America.” Or you can purchase one proclaiming, “TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING.”

If you’re somewhere in the middle, you’re out of yard sign luck.

Continue reading Denison Forum – “Morons Are Governing America” vs. “Trump Was Right About Everything” →

Denison Forum – Why the “No Kings” rallies are good news for America

 

A Holy Monday reflection

More than 3,200 “No Kings” rallies were held Saturday across the US. Event organizers estimate more than eight million people attended protests against President Donald Trump’s actions and policies. The name reportedly comes from organizers’ belief that Mr. Trump is acting like a monarch rather than the leader of a democracy.

Whether you joined the protests, are strongly opposed to them, or wish I would write about something else, the demonstrations illustrate this fact about America: our First Amendment “right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” is alive and well.

Imagine similar rallies being held in Iran, Cuba, or China. Actually, you don’t have to use your imagination: When citizens tried in recent years to protest their government publicly in these countries, they were massacred by the thousands. On my trips to Cuba and China, I was cautioned not to speak against the government even in private conversations due to the likelihood that paid informants would be listening. I was also warned that my hotel room was likely bugged and that what I said, even there, was being monitored by the authorities.

Continue reading Denison Forum – Why the “No Kings” rallies are good news for America →

Denison Forum – What is Critical Race Theory and is it biblical?

 

 

In simple terms, Critical Race Theory (CRT) says America still possesses racism that’s at least partially hidden, but still serious. Some level of racism lurks in how we as Americans define what is “normal” in the criminal justice system, in laws, in all levels of education, etc.

Put another way, CRT says that American institutions (i.e., government, education, media, criminal justice system), social norms (i.e., what clothes to wear, how to speak, etiquette, etc.), and many widely held beliefs (i.e., religion, patriotism, philosophies) are corrupted by obscured yet widespread racism.

CRT’s goal is equitable outcomes between races and comprehensive liberation for all minorities.

Interestingly, what this liberation should look like and other fundamental questions, are often left unanswered by CRT. As a theory, CRT primarily critiques other theories while offering few positive values or beliefs. It prioritizes action and results over ideals.

Kimberlé Crenshaw, a CRT legal scholar and the one who coined the term CRT, once remarked that CRT is like a verb in nature, since it is dynamic and action-oriented. According to CRT, there is no such thing as “neutral” scholarship or “neutral” theories; scholarship always includes social influences, motivations, and biases.

Continue reading Denison Forum – What is Critical Race Theory and is it biblical? →

Denison Forum – Is social media the new tobacco?

 

Why the latest court case in California could bring big changes for Facebook, YouTube, and other platforms

Earlier this week, a court in California ruled that Facebook’s parent company, Meta, and Google’s YouTube were liable for damages of $4.2 million and $1.8 million respectively after the companies were sued by a 20-year-old woman—known as KGM during the trial—for creating products that she claims led to anxiety, depression, and a host of other problems in her life. Snapchat and TikTok were also named in the original suit but settled before it went to trial.

When I first read the headlines about the California case, it sounded like the latest in the long line of frivolous lawsuits that make the news from time to time. And to be honest, that’s still where I land to an extent. However, the details of the case are interesting, and the verdict could provide a framework for the thousands of similar lawsuits currently pending.

To this point, social media companies have largely claimed immunity from any damage their products have caused by citing their First Amendment rights. Courts have regularly held that they are, for the most part, not liable for the content posted by other users on their sites, and the Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of a similar defense for major internet providers.

Continue reading Denison Forum – Is social media the new tobacco? →

Denison Forum – NASA will spend $20 billion to build a base on the moon

 

Today’s headlines continue to center on Iran, a country some six thousand miles from the US. Meanwhile, I’m focusing on a location approximately 231,000 miles (the distance varies throughout the year) from us: NASA has announced plans to construct a $20 billion base on the moon’s surface.

Humans were last on the moon in 1972. Why go back now?

Joseph Silk, a Johns Hopkins and Oxford astrophysicist, explains that telescopes constructed there could see much further into space, adding immeasurably to our knowledge of the universe. He adds that rare earth elements critical for modern technologies are “a thousand times more abundant” on the moon than on earth.

And there’s the residual benefit of space exploration. Over the decades, CAT scans, baby formula, home insulation, camera phones, and portable computers and mice were all derived from technology first developed for space travel.

But there’s more. In his 1962 speech announcing the goal of traveling to the moon that decade, President John F. Kennedy cited the great British explorer George Mallory, who died on Mount Everest. When asked why he wanted to climb it, Mallory said simply, “Because it is there.”

President Kennedy added: “Well, space is there, and we’re going to climb it.”

There is something in us that wants to make an impact in life that surpasses and outlives us. This is a “signal of transcendence” (to use sociologist Peter Berger’s phrase), a desire that points to a dimension for which this transitory world is a means to an eternal end.

You and I are unlikely to seek such significance through space travel, but we can nonetheless live this day for its highest purpose.

How?

“The last of the human freedoms”

A traditional Jewish response to someone grieving the death of a loved one is to say, “May their memory be a blessing.” This sentiment has ancient roots.

Wise King Solomon observed, “The memory of the righteous is a blessing, but the name of the wicked will rot” (Proverbs 10:7). Righteous translates the Hebrew for someone who is “upright” and “devout,” while wicked describes the opposite, a person who is unrighteous, criminal, and impious. When the former are remembered, people thank God for them and are blessed by their memory, while the reputation and memory of the latter will “rot” and decay over time.

I think of Adolf Hitler, who was hailed as a national savior when he rose to power in Germany but whose name is now synonymous with the absolute worst of humanity. By contrast, Harry Truman was one of the most unpopular politicians in the United States when he left office in January 1953, but historians today rank him among our greatest presidents.

I say all of that to say this: Our character is more important to our impact on the world than our circumstances. We cannot always control or predict the latter. However, as Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl wrote in Man’s Search for Meaning, “Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.”

The famed psychiatrist added: “Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom.”

But there’s a catch.

“The young man who rings the bell at the brothel”

The theologian and novelist Frederick Buechner observed, “Lust is the craving for salt of a person who is dying of thirst.” The French philosopher Simone Weil would have agreed, asserting that “all sins are attempts to fill voids.”

However, the “voids” we attempt to fill are ultimately symptoms of a single source. As the Scottish novelist Bruce Marshall had one of his characters say, “The young man who rings the bell at the brothel is unconsciously looking for God.”

You and I possess a “God-shaped emptiness” because we were created for intimacy with our Creator. The psalmist therefore spoke for us all: “My soul longs, yes, faints for the courts of the Lᴏʀᴅ” (Psalm 84:2).

Accordingly, he prayed, “Blessed are those who dwell in your house, ever singing your praise!” (v. 4). When we experience such intimacy with the Almighty, though we travel through the deserts of the “Valley of Baca,” we “make it a place of springs” (v. 6). This is why the psalmist could say to God, “A day in your courts is better than a thousand elsewhere” (v. 10).

But there’s a catch.

“It was character that got us out of bed”

The key to the spiritual life is being yielded daily to the Spirit (Ephesians 5:18). However, our spiritual enemy wants us to do anything more than he wants us to do this. Accordingly, Oswald Chambers warned, “Christian work may be a means of evading the soul’s concentration on Christ.”

We can focus on working for God in his “courts” so fully that we do not walk with him through the day. Consequently, as Chambers noted in today’s My Utmost for His Highest reading, “If we are going to retain personal contact with the Lord Jesus Christ, it will mean there are some things we must scorn to do or think, some legitimate things we must scorn to touch.”

The good in this world can be the enemy of the best in the next. This is because, as Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36), and our Father now “calls you into his own kingdom and glory” (1 Thessalonians 2:12).

One day “the kingdom of the world” will “become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he shall reign forever and ever” (Revelation 11:15). The best way for our lives to be significant on that day is to make him our King today.

Whatever it takes, whatever he asks, whatever the cost.

Zig Ziglar noted,

“It was character that got us out of bed, commitment that moved us into action, and discipline that enabled us to follow through.”

Will you partner with the Spirit in choosing all three today, to the glory of God?

Quote for the day:

“Your commitments can develop you or destroy you, but either way, they will define you.” —Rick Warren

Our latest website resources:

 

Denison Forum

Denison Forum – California city council advances polyamory protections

 

March 24, 2026

The Dow surged 631 points yesterday after President Trump said the US and Iran have held “very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East.” In response, the president postponed strikes on Iranian power plants for a five-day period.

However, I’m following a different story today that I believe to be enormously significant as well. I have not seen it widely reported, which points to my point.

According to the Los Angeles Times, West Hollywood’s city council has unanimously approved advancing what the article calls a “registry of multi-partner domestic relationships.” The writer explains that West Hollywood is now “the latest of a few cities in the US to pursue legal protection for groups of more than two adults living in a single household who are romantically or otherwise committed to each other.”

Advocates claim that such protections are needed for a broad group of people, such as immigrant households that depend on extended family members for child care and support. Multigenerational families living together would be another example.

And of course, the ordinance is intended to “protect” polyamorous households where multiple sexual partners live together.

Would today’s article be illegal?

Even though I strongly disagree with polyamory on biblical, moral, and practical grounds, I understand that our secularized culture does not typically legislate morality with regard to such consensual behavior. For example, though 90 percent of Americans consider “married people having an affair” to be “morally wrong,” adultery is not illegal in the US.

But here’s the part of the article that could easily be overlooked: the West Hollywood city council also “outlawed discrimination against polyamorous people and others in nontraditional family structures” and has added “family or relationship structure as a protected class in the city alongside race, religion, gender, and other categories.” The anti-discrimination law will go into effect in mid-April.

Will it mean a church or ministry would be forced to hire someone in a polyamorous relationship? What about Christians operating a business? What about believers who use their influence to defend biblical morality in this context?

Would today’s article be illegal in West Hollywood?

“The greatest danger to our future”

For several years, I have spotlighted the four-stage strategy employed by LGBTQ advocates in our society: normalize immoral behavior through popular media, legalize such behavior, stigmatize those who disagree as “homophobic” and otherwise dangerous, and criminalize such opposition. Today’s discussion is one example of the fourth stage.

Jane Goodall, the famed British primatologist and animal rights activist, once warned:

“The greatest danger to our future is apathy.”

However, as a strong advocate for LGBTQ causes, she meant her warning in precisely the opposite way that I am endorsing it today.

It is human nature to focus on issues that seem most relevant to us personally. This “fight-or-flight response” is our natural, automatic reaction to stress or danger. Whether you attribute it to evolutionary development or God’s design (I choose the latter), you can understand the need to evaluate all experiences, including this article, through a prism of personal relevance.

Consequently, unless you live in West Hollywood or in the few cities in Massachusetts or on the West Coast where polyamory “protections” have been enacted, this threat to religious liberty can seem remote and thus less relevant to you.

But that’s only because we tend to overlook how this strategy works. Statutes deemed legal in small towns can then be advanced to major cities. What starts in one part of the country can advance to others. And when such actions rise to the level of federal civil rights, they can supersede states’ rights (as occurred in 1973 when Roe v. Wade overturned abortion prohibitions in at least thirty-one states).

Three reasons to reject moral apathy

Consequently, moral apathy is indeed “the greatest danger to our future.” Consider three reasons.

The first is legal, as we have seen.

When Massachusetts legalized same-sex marriage in 2004, the response by evangelicals would likely have been much stronger if we had foreseen that the US Supreme Court would discover this “right” in the Constitution a decade later and impose it on the entire country. Why should we think the same cannot happen with polyamory?

The second is personal.

Because Satan hates us, he will never tempt us to commit sin that will pay more than it costs us. He loves to turn down the moral lights in our cultural room so gradually that our eyes adjust and we find ourselves in the dark without complaint. And he knows that sin we tolerate in others often metastasizes into sin we commit personally.

This is why God’s word warns: “Desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin, and sin when it is fully grown brings forth death” (James 1:15). Because Satan always seeks to “steal and kill and destroy” (John 10:10), “death” and nothing less is his ultimate goal. And moral apathy is one of his most effective means to this end.

The third is collective.

Because God is holy (Isaiah 6:3; Revelation 4:8), he must judge unconfessed sin. His word is clear: “I will punish the world for its evil, and the wicked for their iniquity” (Isaiah 13:11). He therefore warns us, “Repent and turn from all your transgressions, lest iniquity be your ruin” (Ezekiel 18:30).

Our Father deals with us as gently as he can or as harshly as he must. The more society chooses moral apathy, the more we force him to choose the latter. This is why “righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people” (Proverbs 14:34).

“Conscience asks the question, ‘Is it right?’”

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. observed:

Cowardice asks the question, “Is it safe?” Expediency asks the question, “Is it politic?” Vanity asks the question, “Is it popular?” But conscience asks the question, “Is it right?” And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but one must take it because one’s conscience tells one that it is right.

Where do you need to take such a position today?

Quote for the day:

“The world won’t be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” —Albert Einstein

Our latest website resources:

 

Denison Forum

Denison Forum – What is the greatest obstacle to peace in Iran?

 

We’re learning this morning that the US has sent Iran a fifteen-point plan to end the war in the Middle East. The plan was delivered by way of Pakistan, but it is unclear how widely it has been shared among Iranian officials.

However, Israeli journalist Amit Segal reports that Israeli leaders fear the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) will undermine any agreement with the West. Yesterday’s announcement that Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, a former IRGC commander, will replace the slain Ali Larijani as head of the country’s security council reinforces their fears.

Why would the IRGC want to continue fighting a war that is so devastating to their nation?

Winning by not losing

According to an extensive report by the Middle East Institute, the IRGC has developed in recent years from a militia into a “parallel state” within Iran. Its leaders and members understand the world through the prism of Mahdism: the return of the twelfth divinely ordained Imam Mahdi, who will rid the world of evil and injustice through “one final apocalyptic battle” between the dar al-Islam (land of Muslims) and dar al-Kufr (land of infidels).

They believe that the 1979 Islamic Revolution marked the first stage in the Mahdi’s return. The IRGC now exists to “prepare the world for the emergence of Imam of the Age” by fighting the “enemies” of Islam.

In such a conflict, they win by not losing. The survival of the IRGC and the Islamic regime constitutes success, enabling them to continue their aggression against Israel and the West until they are defeated and/or the Mahdi returns. In this sense, the US and Israel are fighting a military battle against an ideological foe.

For anyone who doubts whether the spiritual is real or relevant, this conflict should be proof enough.

“The wind blows where it wishes”

A bench beside a pond in our neighborhood is my favorite place to visit. When I spend time there in the early morning, it often seems that the veil between the physical and the spiritual lifts just a bit. I sense the Creator in his creation and feel more than hear his voice in my spirit.

Sitting by the pond yesterday, my attention was drawn to a fish jumping in the water. By the time I heard the splash it made, it was too late to see it, but the ripples it created cascaded to the shoreline.

The thought came to me: like the world beneath the surface of the pond, the world of the Spirit is often most evident through the effects it produces in our fallen world.

Consider wind as an example. I’ve experienced it all my life, but never wondered why. It turns out, wind is primarily caused by the uneven heating of our planet’s surface by the sun. As air moves from areas of cooler air to warmer air, wind is produced. The earth’s rotation (known as the Coriolis force) also deflects air movement, and friction with the earth’s surface causes diverging winds as well.

All that to say, we don’t see the forces that produce the wind, but we feel what they produce. Jesus made this point to Nicodemus: “The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes” (John 3:8a).

Then our Lord added, “So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit” (v. 8b).

This is as it must be. The God who is Spirit must work in nonmaterial ways in our material world. He leads us through his inner voice, the truth of Scripture, and the circumstances of our days into obedience that manifests itself in tangible, material ways. We see what he does by the results in and through our lives.

When “we walk by faith, not by sight” (2 Corinthians 5:7), we see the effects of our faith on our walk. And so does the world.

The faith to have faith

This fact relates first to our salvation.

When a brilliant friend and I were talking the other day, he asked me how I knew with certainty that I was a child of God and that I would go to heaven when I die. I told him that I had learned over the years this fact: it takes faith today to believe God saved me, just as it did when I asked him to do so.

I still cannot prove through scientific means that God exists, much less that he loves me, his Son died to pay the penalty for my sins, and now his Spirit lives in me as his temple (1 Corinthians 3:16). These are all relational truth claims. And while objective evidence from archaeology, history, ancient manuscripts, fulfilled prophecy, and changed lives is strongly compelling, relationships cannot be proven—only experienced.

Just as I cannot prove to you that my wife loves me, I cannot prove to you that God loves you. But I can invite you to experience your Father’s love for yourself by faith.

“Though I was blind, now I see”

This conversation points to a second reality: our changed lives are often our most compelling apologetic for Christ.

I can show you through the ancient writings of Tacitus, Suetonius, Mara bar Serapion, Pliny the Younger, and Josephus that Jesus existed and was crucified, and that his early followers believed him to be raised from the dead and worshiped him as God. But you can say they were all wrong. Or you could make a postmodern move and say that’s just “their truth.”

What a skeptic cannot so easily dismiss is the change Christ makes in a life fully surrendered to his Spirit (Ephesians 5:18). Like the man born blind, we can say to the world, “One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see” (John 9:25). Others may dismiss our theology, but they cannot say that our experience is not our experience.

And when they see the difference Jesus is making in our lives (cf. John 10:10), they may be drawn to seek that difference in their lives as well.

Church baptizes four hundred in one weekend

Lead Pastor Jason Britt of Bethlehem Church in Georgia was recently teaching a series on Acts 2 and the Day of Pentecost. He felt prompted to call for spontaneous baptisms, and four hundred people were baptized across the church’s three campuses during one weekend.

He explained: “A Spirit-filled church is full of Spirit-sensitive people, and Spirit-sensitive people obey.”

How sensitive to the Spirit are you today?

Quote for the day:

“Without the Spirit of God, we can do nothing. We are as ships without wind. We are useless.” —Charles Spurgeon

Our latest website resources:

 

Denison Forum

Denison Forum – Both pilots killed after jet hits fire truck at LaGuardia

 

An Air Canada Express jet collided with a fire truck while landing at New York’s LaGuardia Airport late last night. Both pilots were killed, dozens of people were injured, and the airport will remain closed until at least 2 p.m. ET today.

Earlier in the day, I received news that my spiritual mother had passed away.

In August 1973, two men knocked on my apartment door in Houston, Texas, inviting my brother and me to ride their bus to church. When we did, I was assigned to the tenth-grade Sunday school class taught by Sharon Sewell, the pastor’s wife.

She made me her project, inviting me to youth ministry events and calling me each Saturday to encourage me to come to church the next morning. On September 9, 1973, she led me to faith in Christ. I will be grateful for her forever, literally.

Mrs. Sewell had been declining rapidly in recent weeks. Her son told me yesterday that her last words to him were, “I want to go to heaven.” She is now reunited with her husband, my first pastor, and we are celebrating her homegoing.

Some deaths, like those that occurred in NYC last night, are tragic. Others are cause for gratitude.

Chadwick Boseman’s widow on “the weight of grief”

When acclaimed actor Chadwick Boseman died from colon cancer in August 2020 at the age of forty-three, many were shocked to hear that he had cancer. His widow, Simone Ledward Boseman, told Today last Friday that his symptoms began just weeks before his diagnosis and that he chose to fight the disease privately.

When asked if grieving gets easier over time, her response was poignant and profound.

“The edges get less sharp, I think, is the best way to put it,” she said. “There are still edges and there are still a lot of painful moments. But I think it becomes easier to find the love in those moments as well. You become more accustomed to carrying the weight of grief. But it doesn’t go away.”

Most of us who have experienced significant loss would agree with her, I think.

My father died in 1979 at the age of fifty-five. To this day, my greatest grief is that he never met my sons. He would have been a wonderful grandfather. Over these many years, I have “become more accustomed to carrying the weight of grief,” but it is still there.

“People are shoved to the left side of their brains”

In the years since, however, I have come to believe that God redeems all he allows and to look for such redemption with my father’s passing. In this regard, Arthur Brooks’s latest article for the Free Press is insightful.

He writes that many of the young people he has taught at Harvard and met in other settings are “undeniably, desperately, incorrigibly unhappy.” When he started asking their stories, he discovered a common thread: their lives are busy but not meaningful.

Wealth and achievement are insufficient in this regard. In fact, Brooks reports that the wealthier and more technologically advanced the country, the greater the percentage of the population that answers “no” to the question, “Do you feel your life has an important purpose or meaning?”

He explains this paradox in a way I had not seen. Most of us are familiar with the hypothesis that the left side of our brain is logical while the right side is creative. Brooks notes that this is not accurate: both hemispheres deal with just about everything our brains do. But they do so in consistently different ways.

Brooks cites the work of the British neuroscientist and psychiatrist Iain McGilchrist, who shows that the right side of our brain is the “master,” asking big, transcendent questions such as “Why am I alive?” The left side, which McGilchrist calls the “emissary,” addresses such practical questions as “How do I get food so I can keep being alive?”

Here’s the problem, as Brooks explains:

In our increasingly complicated, technology-dominated, and endlessly distracting world, people are shoved to the left side of their brains. They are stuck in a complicated simulation where there is a lot going on, but which is bereft of mystery and meaning.

A gateway into a life of purpose

With regard to “carrying the weight of grief”: Our left-side, secularized culture processes death in practical, present-tense terms. We make arrangements for the funeral, manage the financial and practical aftermath, and seek ways to move on with our daily lives.

But the right-side, transcendent questions remain: What does my grief say about God? About me? About my purpose in life?

In my case, God has used my father’s early death to lead me into what has become my lifelong vocation: to engage the ultimate questions of life with biblical truth. I have focused on innocent suffering and other deep issues as a philosophy professor, a pastor, and now as a cultural apologist. My father’s death has become my gateway into a life of purpose as I seek to help others find purpose in their questions and challenges.

None of this makes my father’s early death any less painful. I still miss him and still wish he could know my children and now my grandchildren. But I find peace in the purpose his death has forged for me.

And I am grateful beyond words for the presence of my Father as he has grieved with me over these many years and we have walked together through “the valley of the shadow of death” (Psalm 23:4).

Why God “comforts us in all our affliction”

If you’re “carrying the weight of grief” today, could I encourage you to seek God’s purpose in your pain? To ask him to show you how you can partner with him in redeeming your loss? To look for ways to be what Henri Nouwen called a “wounded healer,” someone whose pain enables you to help others with theirs?

If you’re not carrying such weight today, do you know someone who is? Will you pray for them to find meaning in their grief and walk with them toward hope?

The Apostle Paul was no stranger to suffering (cf. 2 Corinthians 11:23–29), but he testified that our Lord is “the Father of mercies and God of all comfort” (2 Corinthians 1:3). And he discovered a purpose in such grace, adding that God “comforts us in all our affliction, so that we may be able to comfort those who are in any affliction, with the comfort with which we ourselves are comforted by God” (v. 4).

How will you pay forward such grace today?

Quote for the day:

“Our infirmities become the black velvet on which the diamond of God’s love glitters all the more brightly.” —Charles Spurgeon

Our latest website resources:

 

Denison Forum

Denison Forum – Both pilots killed after jet hits fire truck at LaGuardia

 

An Air Canada Express jet collided with a fire truck while landing at New York’s LaGuardia Airport late last night. Both pilots were killed, dozens of people were injured, and the airport will remain closed until at least 2 p.m. ET today.

Earlier in the day, I received news that my spiritual mother had passed away.

In August 1973, two men knocked on my apartment door in Houston, Texas, inviting my brother and me to ride their bus to church. When we did, I was assigned to the tenth-grade Sunday school class taught by Sharon Sewell, the pastor’s wife.

She made me her project, inviting me to youth ministry events and calling me each Saturday to encourage me to come to church the next morning. On September 9, 1973, she led me to faith in Christ. I will be grateful for her forever, literally.

Mrs. Sewell had been declining rapidly in recent weeks. Her son told me yesterday that her last words to him were, “I want to go to heaven.” She is now reunited with her husband, my first pastor, and we are celebrating her homegoing.

Some deaths, like those that occurred in NYC last night, are tragic. Others are cause for gratitude.

Chadwick Boseman’s widow on “the weight of grief”

When acclaimed actor Chadwick Boseman died from colon cancer in August 2020 at the age of forty-three, many were shocked to hear that he had cancer. His widow, Simone Ledward Boseman, told Today last Friday that his symptoms began just weeks before his diagnosis and that he chose to fight the disease privately.

When asked if grieving gets easier over time, her response was poignant and profound.

“The edges get less sharp, I think, is the best way to put it,” she said. “There are still edges and there are still a lot of painful moments. But I think it becomes easier to find the love in those moments as well. You become more accustomed to carrying the weight of grief. But it doesn’t go away.”

Most of us who have experienced significant loss would agree with her, I think.

My father died in 1979 at the age of fifty-five. To this day, my greatest grief is that he never met my sons. He would have been a wonderful grandfather. Over these many years, I have “become more accustomed to carrying the weight of grief,” but it is still there.

“People are shoved to the left side of their brains”

In the years since, however, I have come to believe that God redeems all he allows and to look for such redemption with my father’s passing. In this regard, Arthur Brooks’s latest article for the Free Press is insightful.

He writes that many of the young people he has taught at Harvard and met in other settings are “undeniably, desperately, incorrigibly unhappy.” When he started asking their stories, he discovered a common thread: their lives are busy but not meaningful.

Wealth and achievement are insufficient in this regard. In fact, Brooks reports that the wealthier and more technologically advanced the country, the greater the percentage of the population that answers “no” to the question, “Do you feel your life has an important purpose or meaning?”

He explains this paradox in a way I had not seen. Most of us are familiar with the hypothesis that the left side of our brain is logical while the right side is creative. Brooks notes that this is not accurate: both hemispheres deal with just about everything our brains do. But they do so in consistently different ways.

Brooks cites the work of the British neuroscientist and psychiatrist Iain McGilchrist, who shows that the right side of our brain is the “master,” asking big, transcendent questions such as “Why am I alive?” The left side, which McGilchrist calls the “emissary,” addresses such practical questions as “How do I get food so I can keep being alive?”

Here’s the problem, as Brooks explains:

In our increasingly complicated, technology-dominated, and endlessly distracting world, people are shoved to the left side of their brains. They are stuck in a complicated simulation where there is a lot going on, but which is bereft of mystery and meaning.

A gateway into a life of purpose

With regard to “carrying the weight of grief”: Our left-side, secularized culture processes death in practical, present-tense terms. We make arrangements for the funeral, manage the financial and practical aftermath, and seek ways to move on with our daily lives.

But the right-side, transcendent questions remain: What does my grief say about God? About me? About my purpose in life?

In my case, God has used my father’s early death to lead me into what has become my lifelong vocation: to engage the ultimate questions of life with biblical truth. I have focused on innocent suffering and other deep issues as a philosophy professor, a pastor, and now as a cultural apologist. My father’s death has become my gateway into a life of purpose as I seek to help others find purpose in their questions and challenges.

None of this makes my father’s early death any less painful. I still miss him and still wish he could know my children and now my grandchildren. But I find peace in the purpose his death has forged for me.

And I am grateful beyond words for the presence of my Father as he has grieved with me over these many years and we have walked together through “the valley of the shadow of death” (Psalm 23:4).

Why God “comforts us in all our affliction”

If you’re “carrying the weight of grief” today, could I encourage you to seek God’s purpose in your pain? To ask him to show you how you can partner with him in redeeming your loss? To look for ways to be what Henri Nouwen called a “wounded healer,” someone whose pain enables you to help others with theirs?

If you’re not carrying such weight today, do you know someone who is? Will you pray for them to find meaning in their grief and walk with them toward hope?

The Apostle Paul was no stranger to suffering (cf. 2 Corinthians 11:23–29), but he testified that our Lord is “the Father of mercies and God of all comfort” (2 Corinthians 1:3). And he discovered a purpose in such grace, adding that God “comforts us in all our affliction, so that we may be able to comfort those who are in any affliction, with the comfort with which we ourselves are comforted by God” (v. 4).

How will you pay forward such grace today?

Quote for the day:

“Our infirmities become the black velvet on which the diamond of God’s love glitters all the more brightly.” —Charles Spurgeon

Our latest website resources:

 

Denison Forum

Denison Forum – Is AI a tool for the Antichrist?

 

The problem with Peter Thiel’s take on the end times

Peter Thiel is a Silicon Valley venture capitalist who made his mark with PayPal, Facebook, and Palantir before becoming one of the largest donors to the Republican Party and an early advocate for President Trump. However, he’s in the news this week for an entirely different reason.

Thiel helped organize an exclusive conference in Rome, where he led four days of discussions on the Antichrist and his view that modern society is hurtling toward an inflection point that could pave the way for the end times. He claims that the Antichrist will use issues like nuclear war, climate change, and—perhaps most importantly—artificial intelligence to promise security in exchange for devotion and lead people to submit willingly to the sort of one-world, totalitarian government depicted in Revelation.

But while the lectures in Rome are not the first time he has taught on this subject (he gave similar talks in San Francisco and Paris), this week’s event has generated far more attention in religious circles. Part of the reason is that the meetings were arranged by Catholic organizations and located on the Vatican’s doorstep, both of which raised the ire of the Pope and others who have condemned Thiel’s message.

Continue reading Denison Forum – Is AI a tool for the Antichrist? →

Denison Forum – Dick Van Dyke and scientists tell us how to live longer

 

The legendary actor and comedian Dick Van Dyke recently became a centenarian. He explains his longevity simply: he keeps a positive outlook and never gets angry.

Scientists agree with his theory.

In one study, people who were optimistic lived between 11 and 15 percent longer than their pessimistic counterparts. In another, those who were more optimistic were more likely to live into their nineties than pessimists.

Research shows that chronic stress and anger are linked to an increased risk of heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes, diseases that account for roughly 75 percent of early deaths. Stress is also linked to cellular aging. And researchers studying stroke survivors have found that optimism lowers chronic inflammation, leading to less severe strokes and less physical disability.

However, you and I didn’t need scientists to tell us what we innately understood, that happier people are typically healthier people.

If only knowing and doing God’s will were so obvious and intuitive.

“Yet your footprints were unseen”

I was reading Psalm 77 recently and was struck by verse 16: “When the waters saw you, O God, when the waters saw you, they were afraid; indeed, the deep trembled.” Some scholars believe Asaph was referring to the parting of the Red Sea (Exodus 14), while others point to Israel’s miraculous crossing of the flooded Jordan River (Joshua 3).

Whatever the specific reference, what God did was stupendous: “The clouds poured out water; the skies gave forth thunder; your arrows flashed on every side. The crash of your thunder was in the whirlwind; your lightnings lighted up the world; the earth trembled and shook” (Psalm 77:17–18).

Now to my point: Asaph then prays, “Your way was through the sea, your path through the great waters; yet your footprints were unseen” (v. 19, my emphasis).

It is one thing to follow someone whose “footprints” are obvious to us. It is another to follow someone we cannot see, trusting that their word is true and their will is best, before we can verify either.

“The people passed over in haste”

When the Israelites passed through the parted Red Sea, its waters were “a wall to them on their right hand and on their left” (Exodus 14:22). Imagine what it must have felt like to risk your life and your family in this way, knowing that any moment the waters could come crashing down on you as they later did on the Egyptian army (v. 28).

Forty years later, the people found themselves on the bank of the flooded Jordan River. Again they crossed in peril of their lives, knowing that the flood waters could return at any moment to sweep them away (cf. Joshua 4:18).

No wonder “the people passed over in haste” (v. 10).

God similarly called Abraham to leave his family and homeland, “not knowing where he was going” (Hebrews 11:8). And the Lord called Paul to leave where he had been to go to a place he had never gone (Acts 16:6–10).

Solomon famously advised us: “Trust in the Lᴏʀᴅ with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding” (Proverbs 3:5). There are times when the first requires the second, when our “own understanding” is insufficient for understanding the ways of God, and we must trust what we do not see.

As Jesus said, “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed” (John 20:29). Accordingly, “we walk by faith, not by sight” (2 Corinthians 5:7).

“I will remember your wonders of old”

As a longtime pastor and theologian, I am familiar with the texts I just cited. But that doesn’t mean I like them better than anyone else. I don’t want God’s footprints to be “unseen.” I don’t want to have to go out “not knowing” where I’m going. I want to walk by faith but also by sight.

It seems that God requires unseeing faith as though it is a precondition to knowing his will, a bill we must pay or work we must perform. But we are saved by faith, not by works (Ephesians 2:8–9). There is nothing we can do to make God love us any more or any less than he does right now, because “God is love” (1 John 4:8, my emphasis).

Why, then, must we so often trust his will before we understand it? Because this is so often the only way we can understand it.

How could God prove to the Jews while they crossed the Red Sea or the Jordan River that the waters would not return to drown them? How could he prove to Abraham before he went out “not knowing” that he would become the father of the Jewish nation as a result of his obedience (cf. Galatians 3:6)? How could he prove to Paul before he followed his Macedonian vision that the apostle would take the gospel to the Western world?

Relationships typically require a commitment that transcends the evidence and becomes self-validating. This is true of choosing to be married, having children, taking a job, or even reading this article—you can’t prove my words are worth your time today until you spend your time reading them.

As a result, when I want God to explain his will to me before I choose it, I am asking him to do the logically impossible, like making a square circle or naming the color of the number 7. At such times, I do well to follow Asaph’s example: “I will remember the deeds of the Lᴏʀᴅ; yes, I will remember your wonders of old. I will ponder all your work, and meditate on your mighty deeds” (Psalm 77:11–12).

When I do, I will testify with the psalmist, “Your way, O God, is holy” (v. 13). And I will find the courage to choose this “way” myself.

“The secret of spiritual knowledge”

In Catholic tradition, today is “St. Joseph’s Day.” A ninth-century calendar mentions March 19 and Joseph, implying that this was the day he died. In 1621, Pope Gregory XV made the commemoration of this day official.

For Jesus’ adoptive father, God’s footprints were truly “unseen.” Joseph was told that his fiancée was pregnant with the Messiah and instructed to marry her anyway. He was told to flee Israel for Egypt and later to return. He was directed to settle in Nazareth, a town so small it is not mentioned even once in the Old Testament.

And his obedience changed both history and eternity.

The famed missionary Eric Liddell noted,

“Obedience to God’s will is the secret of spiritual knowledge and insight.”

Will you learn this “secret” today?

Quote for the day:

“The Christian man must aim at that complete obedience to God in which life finds its highest happiness, its greatest good, its perfect consummation, its peace.” —William Barclay

Our latest website resources:

 

Denison Forum

Denison Forum – Why March Madness is for everyone

 

How to enjoy the NCAA Tournament

The NCAA Tournament tips off tonight with the first two play-in games. You’ll still have a couple more days to get your bracket in, though, before the first round starts on Thursday. And while there may be fewer Cinderellas now than in the past, the best teams have seldom been better. And there’s a lesson in that truth that goes well beyond the basketball court.

Why it matters: I usually dedicate this space to an extended look at some issue in the world or our culture, with the hope of helping us understand how to navigate it in ways that honor God and draw us closer to him. I think most of us would agree that the NCAA Tournament does not quite rise to that level. However, few things unite this country like the chance to compete with friends, family, and coworkers in trying (and often failing) to predict how the Tournament will play out. And given everything else going on in our world, it would be a shame if we failed to take a moment to stop and appreciate that opportunity.

The backstory: One of 80 million

The NCAA Tournament—also known as March Madness—kicks off tonight with the first two play-in games. If you’re one of the estimated 80 million people who plan to fill out a bracket for this year’s festivities, though, don’t worry. The games tonight and tomorrow don’t usually count toward your score.

Continue reading Denison Forum – Why March Madness is for everyone →