What the contrast says about our nation and our souls

Thousands of people took to the streets across America yesterday in May Day protests against the Trump administration. The protests were organized under the banner of the 50501 movement, which stands for “fifty protests, fifty states, one movement,” which seeks to “uphold the Constitution and end executive overreach.” More than a thousand protests were organized in cities and towns across the country.

Like the US, Israel has seen large anti-government protests in recent years—first against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s judicial reforms and then to demand the release of all remaining hostages in Gaza. This past March, more than one hundred thousand people turned out at such protests.

But there is a key difference between the two nations, one that reveals a principle vital to our future and the flourishing of our souls.

“Trump’s Single Stroke of Brilliance”

Columnist David Brooks, a longtime critic of Donald Trump, wrote a recent New York Times article surprisingly titled, “Trump’s Single Stroke of Brilliance.” His column is as critical of the president as we would expect. However, Brooks credits the administration for its energy: “It is flooding the zone, firing on all cylinders, moving rapidly on all fronts at once. It is operating at a tremendous tempo, taking the initiative in one sphere after another.”

Subscribe

In his view, those opposed to Mr. Trump need to match his “clarity of purpose” with a “one-sentence mission statement” and a clear strategy for implementing it.

By contrast, historian Gil Troy writes in Jewish News Service that by the start of their May 1 Independence Day, “Israelis will have been bonding culturally, patriotically, and existentially for eighteen intense days already.” I have been in Israel on this day many times over the years. It is deeply moving to see Israeli flags decorating the nation’s balconies and cars. Families gather at beaches, parks, and other spots for picnics, concerts, and parades celebrating the nation, its history, and its future.

Troy notes that 96 percent of Israeli Jews participated in the Passover seder on April 12; some 71 percent avoided bread throughout Passover week. On April 24, the country stood in place for two minutes at 10 a.m. as sirens sounded for Yom Hashoah—Holocaust Remembrance Day—memorializing six million Jews murdered by the Nazis. Then came Wednesday’s Memorial Day, when Israelis honored their war dead and terrorism victims.

On these memorial days, as Troy notes, “regular television programming stops. Cafes, restaurants, theaters, and sports arenas close. Millions light memorial candles.”

Troy reminds us that these annual observances reflect biblical rhythms and are intended “to consecrate, to commemorate, to connect.” They “personalized, popularized, and democratized—and thereby immortalized—ideas, values, and historical events.”

Everything Israelis observed across these weeks centered on their national mission: “to live as a free people in our homeland, the land of Zion.”

What is our national mission?

If you ask five Americans to define our national mission and strategy for fulfilling it, how many answers do you think you’d hear?

What would be your answer to the question?

For America’s Founders, our mission is to advance the “self-evident” truth “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Our strategy fulfills this mission: “To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the government.”

Like Israel’s recent memorials and celebrations, America’s founding mission and strategy are derived from biblical principles. Our mission protects and promotes the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness “endowed by [our] Creator.” Our strategy creates a government by consent of the governed, reflecting the sanctity of all life as created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27).

In both cases, the Founders were adamant that our flourishing depends on the blessing and providence of our Lord. For example, as Dr. Ryan Denison noted in his Daily Article yesterday, the National Day of Prayer observed by many across the country has its antecedents in a congressional appeal in 1775 for the colonies to join in “a Day of public Humiliation, Fasting and Prayer” for God’s blessing on their revolution for independence.

The modern state of Israel has not lost sight of its founding mission and strategy across its seventy-seven years of existence.

As America approaches our 250^th anniversary, have we?

How to find “rest for your souls”

America’s Founders could conceive of such a biblical mission and strategy because America’s first “Great Awakening” unified the colonies, elevated the humanity of all people (including African slaves), and inspired Americans to deep repentance and personal godliness.

How can you and I experience and catalyze such an awakening for the sake of our nation and our souls?

In Matthew 11, Jesus invites us,

Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light” (vv. 28–30).

In Practicing the Way: Be with Jesus. Become like him. Do as he did, pastor and author John Mark Comer notes that the “yoke” was a Hebrew idiom used by a rabbi for “his set of teachings, his way of reading Scripture, his take on how to thrive as a human being in God’s good world.” To “take my yoke upon you” means to live holistically by Jesus’ teaching as our life mission. To “learn” from him is the strategy by which we fulfill this mission as we seek his guidance in every dimension of our lives.

When we do this, we discover that our Lord is “gentle and lowly in heart,” meaning that he is kind and humble, wanting only our best in every dimension of our lives. The more we live by his word and will, the more we find “rest for [our] souls,” a peace that transcends all circumstances. This is because Jesus’ yoke is “easy,” a word meaning to be useful and best for us, while the “burden” or work he intends for us is “easy to bear” in his power and purpose.

So I’ll close by asking:

• When last did you consciously and intentionally choose Jesus’ “yoke” and no other?
• When last did you determine to live by his word and will alone?
• When last did you seek his help in wearing his yoke and bearing his burden?
• When last did you find “rest for your soul”?

Why not today?

Quote for the day:

“The command of Jesus is hard, unutterably hard, for those who try to resist it. But for those who willingly submit, the yoke is easy, and the burden is light.” —Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship

Our latest website resources:

• Meta and Apple fined nearly $1 billion and an exposé of Meta: Why stories matter
• Pope Francis on five ways to engage a hostile culture
• What Christians believe—and why it matters
• 100 days of Trump, Shedeur Sanders draft drama, global tensions & an oil change story
• Deion Sanders’ advice to his son Shedeur after draft slide

Denison Forum

America’s primary abortion pill causes serious complications for 1 out of 10 women

Mifepristone, one of two pills used in facilitating chemical abortions, gained FDA approval twenty-five years ago after a study of just under thirty-one thousand participants showed that less than .5 percent experienced serious adverse reactions. That statistic has since been cited to defend not only the use of the pill but also the removal of almost every safeguard that was put in place when it was first introduced to the public.

Initially, women could not obtain the drugs until going to three in-person visits, after which only a physician could prescribe and dispense the pills, which had to be taken in the doctor’s office. An in-office follow-up visit was also required, and any adverse events that resulted from the pills had to be reported.

Now none of what I just described is still the case. All that is required today for a woman to receive the pills necessary to end a pregnancy is a Teladoc appointment and a mailing address. So, perhaps it should not come as a surprise that mifepristone is not nearly as “safe and effective” as originally thought. And the reality is far worse than you might imagine.

A recent analysis by the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) of more than 865,000 cases since 2017 has shown that “10.93 percent of women experience sepsis, infection, hemorrhaging, or another serious adverse event within 45 days following a mifepristone abortion.” That means serious complications are twenty-two times more likely to occur than either the FDA or the pill’s makers have claimed.

How the EPPC study was done

The EPPC came to these conclusions by analyzing “real-world insurance claims data for 865,727 prescribed mifepristone abortions, broadly representative of women who obtain mifepristone abortions in the US today.” As such, where the initial study revolved around a closely monitored and selected group of women who took the pills under the care of a doctor, this latest study is far more representative of how this kind of abortion is actually obtained and administered today.

Considering that chemical abortions account for roughly two-thirds of all abortions in the United States, an accurate assessment of the risk they pose to those who choose to take them is essential. And, if anything, the EPPC study undersells the problem.

The folks behind the research were intentionally conservative in their approach to the study. Where the FDA uses a 72-day timeframe for tracking adverse events, they limited the scope of their findings to 45 days. Moreover, by relying on insurance claims to form their data set, they could not capture statistics for women who purchased the pills through cash pay transactions, which “are disproportionately common for abortion.”

As such, while the rate of serious complications in nearly 11 percent of cases is likely accurate for women who were not part of their study, the raw numbers are much higher.

So, where are we likely to go from here? Will the new research lead to real change or fall on deaf ears?

Fortunately, there could be some good news in this regard.

Where do we go from here?

In a conversation with Amna Nawaz of PBS News last week, Dr. Marty Makary, the new commissioner of the FDA, was asked about mifepristone and if the FDA might move to impose new restrictions on the drug. In response, Makary stated, “I have no plans to take action on mifepristone.” But while that statement is not exactly encouraging, he didn’t stop there. Malkarky went on to add that:

“I believe as a scientist, you got to evolve as the data comes in. And, as you may know, there is an ongoing set of data that is coming into FDA on mifepristone. So if the data suggests something or tells us that there’s a real signal, then I—we can’t promise we’re not going to act on that data that we have not yet seen.”

In the wake of EPPC’s report, Senator Josh Hawley, who sits on the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, penned an open letter to Dr. Makary urging him “to follow this new data and take all appropriate action to restore critical safeguards on the use of mifepristone.” He gave the FDA commissioner until May 15 to respond, with the clear expectation that the data from EPPC should lead to fundamental changes in how mifepristone is administered.

Moreover, when the Supreme Court heard a case on the ongoing legality of the drug last June, it ruled against a challenge that would have made it more difficult to receive it. However, it did so because the group that brought the case before them lacked standing rather than because the case itself was without merit. As I wrote at the time, Justice Kavanaugh—who wrote the majority opinion for the Court—strongly intimated that any group that brought a similar case with standing in the future might expect a different and more positive outcome.

It is possible that the latest data on just how much the FDA and the makers of mifepristone have misrepresented its safety could give additional grounds for such a case to be brought again.

Celebrating each victory

Ultimately, it’s too soon to know what impact the EPPC study will have on abortion pills and their availability, but any additional limitations and safeguards around who is eligible to receive them could help save tens of thousands of lives, both among the unborn and their mothers. And that is a possibility worth celebrating, even if it falls short of the complete removal of abortion pills from the marketplace.

You see, one of the most challenging aspects of being pro-life in our culture today is the knowledge that we are unlikely to ever see abortion removed as an option for those who wish to end their pregnancy. While we can and should work to that end, both by changing laws and—more importantly—changing hearts, we can’t afford to become so fixated on that goal that we fail to appreciate the smaller wins along the way.

Just as heaven rejoices when a single soul is saved, we too should rejoice every time a mother chooses life (Luke 15:7). If the EPPC study leads to changed laws and greater protection for both the unborn and their mothers, then that is a win and should be celebrated as such.

Will you join me in praying for that outcome today? Will you pray that this study finds its way to the right people and that laws are changed to reflect reality on this issue? And, lastly, will you pray that God works in the hearts and minds of every person considering abortion today and helps them choose life, both for themselves and for their child?

These are prayers our heavenly Father longs to answer, and we should rejoice with him every time he does.

Let’s start today.

Quote of the day:

“Gratitude is not only the greatest of virtues, but the parent of all others.” —Cicero

Our latest website resources:

• A review of Michael Heiser’s “The Unseen Realm”
• Deion Sanders’ advice to his son Shedeur after draft slide
• Trump’s first hundred days and Judge Hannah Dugan’s arrest
• Massive crowds fill St. Peter’s Square for Pope Francis’s funeral

Denison Forum