Why Kamala Harris’s pick for VP may not be the safe choice many expected

Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris will have their first debate on ABC next month, with two more potentially following on NBC and Fox—though Harris has not yet agreed to the other two. But while the debates between Trump and Harris appear set, a meeting between their respective running mates is still up in the air. Both Senator JD Vance and Governor Tim Walz have expressed an interest in such a debate, but will likely have to wait until after the Democratic Convention in a couple of weeks to set a date.

In the meantime, we’ll have to settle for continuing to hear each candidate talk about one another rather than to one another. And, if the past few days are any indication of what’s to come, that back and forth is unlikely to prove overly cordial. As such, our time is better spent learning more about the candidates than on paying attention to what they say about one another.

Dr. Jim Denison wrote about Vance’s story after he was named Trump’s running mate and, today, I’d like to do the same with Walz.

Who is Tim Walz?

While distilling anyone’s life into a few bullet points promises to fall short of giving the full picture, what follows are some of the more pertinent parts of Walz’s story to date:

• Walz was born and raised in West Point, Nebraska—a community of 3,500 people roughly an hour outside of Omaha—before joining the National Guard at seventeen.
• He and his wife moved to Mankato, Minnesota in the 1990s. While there, he taught social studies and coached football at the local high school, winning a state championship in 1999.
• He served in the Army National Guard for twenty-four years before retiring to pursue a career in politics.
• While in the National Guard, he achieved the rank of command sergeant major before retiring with the rank of master sergeant. The demotion was due to leaving before he completed the necessary coursework to keep the higher rank. The circumstances surrounding his departure have resurfaced as a point of heated debate in recent days and will be addressed a bit later in this article.
• After leaving the National Guard, he spent twelve years in the House of Representatives before becoming governor of Minnesota in 2018. He is currently in the middle of his second term in that role.

Walz’s story as a small-town military veteran who went on to serve in contested districts and lead an often-divided state government is, perhaps, the chief reason that Harris selected him to be her running mate in the upcoming election.

However, his selection was not without some controversy, and it remains to be seen if the initial buzz he’s brought to the campaign will last until November.

Was Walz the right choice?

One of the chief reasons some are unhappy with—or, at least, skeptical of—Walz’s selection is that it came in place of Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro.

Allegations of antisemitism were at the heart of the discussion early on—Shapiro is a practicing Jew who has been vocal about the war in Israel, though Walz has echoed many of the same positions. However, the focus has shifted more to the selection’s impact on the electoral map since the announcement was first made.

You see, Shapiro is the popular leader of, perhaps, the election’s most important state. The latest polling suggests that whoever wins Pennsylvania has a 34 percent chance of winning the election, with Wisconsin as the next most significant state at 17 percent. Minnesota, by contrast, has a less than 1 percent chance of tipping the scales toward either candidate.

Such data is why many Democrats winced—and Republicans rejoiced—when Harris chose Walz over Shapiro.

However, Walz’s proponents argue that, while his state is not nearly as contested as others, his story, personality, and other attributes will help them solidify their base and appeal to undecided voters.

But while aspects of Walz’s story may appeal to many not currently planning to vote for Harris this fall, his politics—particularly in recent years—may not.

Walz’s “signature accomplishments”

In describing his “signature accomplishments” as governor, Walz lists a number of issues that could be bipartisan in nature, or at least were in Minnesota. Topics like providing free breakfast and lunch in schools, adding benefits and protections for veterans, rebuilding roads and bridges, and making it easier for people to get government jobs without a college degree were all popular measures across party lines in his state.

However, those measures are paired with points that are a good bit more controversial in nature.

Under his leadership, Minnesota instituted some of the nation’s most progressive protections to trans individuals—including minors—while also being to the left of most when it comes to gun laws and voter registration. In addition, he signed laws protecting abortion at any point during pregnancy and granting illegal immigrants many of the rights typically reserved for citizens, such as the ability to get a driver’s license.

In addition, Walz has been criticized for his delayed response to the 2020 protests over the killing of George Floyd—though then-President Trump praised the steps Walz took once he sent in the National Guard.

His military record, while decorated, has also resurfaced as a source of controversy for how it ended. Walz retired two months before his unit was sent to Iraq in 2005, though it’s unclear when he put in his retirement papers.

The subject has also been raised in previous elections, and Walz’s motivations for his decision remain unclear. However, JD Vance—a Marine veteran—was the latest to raise the issue, accusing Walz of “stolen valor” for the way the governor has spoken of his time in the military throughout his political career.

Choosing purpose over politics

Ultimately, whether you agree, disagree, or simply don’t care about the extent to which Walz was the correct choice to join Harris on the Democratic ticket, what will matter far more over the next few months is how you choose to engage with the discussion.

Regardless of whether your side wins or loses, God will still be on his throne, America will most likely continue to exist, and chances are good that the day-to-day experience of your life will be impacted far less than you expect. Most importantly, your highest calling—to share God’s good news in service to God’s kingdom—will not change.

However, fulfilling that calling will be far more difficult if you’ve burned bridges and spoken or acted in ways that diminish your witness between now and November.

So the next time you’re tempted to prioritize politics over your higher purpose in Christ, remember that this world—as important as it may be—is not our home, and our ultimate allegiance belongs to God.

How can you serve him today?

Denison Forum

The paradoxical solution to our loneliness epidemic

The news of the week has been monumental, to say the least, from unprecedented political developments to weather-related disasters to the specter of an escalating war in the Middle East. So, for a day, let’s take a break from all of that to consider a whimsical headline that may be a sign of our times: “AI-Powered Necklace Will Be Your Friend for $99.”

“Friend” is a pendant about the size of an Apple AirTag. Avi Schiffman, the twenty-one-year-old Harvard dropout who invented it, told Wired that he created the device at a time when he had “never felt more lonely in my entire life.”

The onboard microphone listens to everything happening around you. Powered by AI, it will answer questions but also send unprompted messages to engage in conversation and offer encouragement.

In other words, it’s a technological companion to make up for the real thing.

It should not surprise us that Schiffman is in search of friends: his Gen Z cohort reports the poorest mental health of any generation in America as they struggle with alarming rates of loneliness, depression, and suicidal thoughts. They are also our nation’s least religious generation.

Perhaps there is correlation, if not causation, here?

By contrast, actively religious people are:

• More likely to describe themselves as “very happy.”
• Healthier, with greater longevity, better coping skills, and less anxiety, depression, and suicide.
• More psychologically resilient with a higher quality of life.
• Better able to handle economic uncertainty and downturns.

Why, then, aren’t more Americans more religious?

When I tried to defy the law of gravity

When I was a small boy, I wanted to fly more than anything. I used to lay in the grass, look up into the clouds, and imagine soaring among them like Superman. So, one day I took some bedsheets and used them to make myself wings. I then climbed up on the roof of our house and jumped off.

My childhood mind truly believed that I would be able to fly when I did so, that the reality of gravity would submit to the reality of my newfound ability. But I was wrong (and lucky I didn’t break a leg).

Now consider the One who truly can supersede the laws of the world he created: “God is the King of all the earth . . . God reigns over the nations; God sits on his holy throne” (Psalm 47:7–8). This is a present-tense fact, no matter what circumstances might seem to say.

Our problem is that we judge objective reality by our subjective experience rather than the other way around. As a result, we are “breaking bones” right and left.

According to recent Gallup polling:

• 54 percent of Americans consider abortion to be morally acceptable.
• 53 percent support doctor-assisted suicide, a higher number than those who agree with medical testing on animals, at 48 percent.
• 69 percent find sex between an unmarried man and woman to be morally acceptable.
• 64 percent support gay or lesbian relations.
• 23 percent support polygamy (up from 7 percent twenty years ago).

Are we surprised that only 5 percent of us are “very satisfied” with the moral climate of our nation?

“When your child swallows poison”

How does our weeklong focus on God’s transforming love relate to today’s conversation? In a way we might not expect.

In Smoke on the Mountain: An Interpretation of the Ten Commandments, Joy Davidman (the wife of C. S. Lewis) asked: “Mustn’t the churches adapt Christianity to suit the ideas of our time?” Then she answered her question:

No, they must not. Our ideas are killing us spiritually. When your child swallows poison, you don’t sit around thinking of ways to adapt his constitution to a poisonous diet. You give him an emetic [medicine that induces vomiting].

God wants to do the same for us.

It is because our Father loves his children so fervently that he hates everything that is not best for us. When our oldest son and our youngest grandson were diagnosed with cancer, I hated the disease with a passion beyond words. This is how our Lord feels about the sins that tempt us.

Of course, our spiritual enemy feels just the opposite. According to Jesus, Satan “comes only to steal and kill and destroy” (John 10:10). So the next time temptation arises, ask yourself:

• What will this steal?
• Whom will it kill?
• How will it destroy?

If the answers are not apparent, ask the Spirit to reveal them to you. And remember that “God is love” (1 John 4:8). If his word forbids something, it must be because it is harmful for you. If he commands something, it must be because it is best for you. His unchanging character requires it.

Now ask his Spirit to empower you to think, speak, and act biblically in response to your temptations and all through your day. When you do, you will experience the transforming love and abiding presence of your Lord in ways no technology (or human) could ever match.

How Michelangelo sculpted David

I will always remember seeing Michelangelo’s massive statue of David for the first time. Standing seventeen feet tall in the Galleria dell’Accademia in Florence, Italy, it towers over those who come to view it. It took the famed Renaissance artist nearly three years to complete it, chipping away at a large block of marble until the masterpiece was completed.

When the pope asked the sculptor the secret of his genius, Michelangelo responded: “It’s simple. I just removed everything that was not David.”

If you were to resemble Jesus, the “son of David” (Matthew 1:1), more fully than ever before, what would your divine sculptor change today?

NOTE: “Meditating on God’s wisdom can transform our nights and ultimately, our lives,” says Janet Denison, author of the new 365-evening devotional, Wisdom Matters. We want to send you this powerful new resource to thank you for your donation to support the Christ-centered, culture-changing content at Denison Forum. Get your copy of Wisdom Matters today.

Thursday news to know:

• Israel’s bomb shelters are last line of defense as Iran strike looms
• How Kamala Harris trusted her gut and picked Tim Walz
• Taylor Swift Austria concerts canceled after terror plot arrests
• Tropical storm Debby flood threat to spread from Carolinas to Northeast, including New England
• On this day in 1974: Nixon resigns

*Denison Forum does not necessarily endorse the views expressed in these stories.

Quote for the day:

“Be killing sin or it will be killing you.” —John Owen

Denison Forum

Amid unprecedented challenges, a transforming antidote to fear

Karl Rove is a political consultant and former White House Deputy Chief of Staff. In a recent Wall Street Journal commentary, he writes: “No presidential election has been remotely like this one.”

Let’s list some ways he’s right:

• Kamala Harris formally secured the Democratic presidential nomination on Monday, becoming the first woman of color to lead a major party ticket.
• She selected Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate yesterday, introducing him at a rally in Philadelphia. If elected, he would be the first practicing Lutheran to serve as vice president. (Hubert Humphrey was raised Lutheran but attended a Methodist church.)
• This after President Joe Biden withdrew from the race closer to the election than any incumbent seeking reelection in US history.
• The Republican nominee, Donald J. Trump, if successful, would be only the second president to be elected, defeated for reelection, and then reelected. (Grover Cleveland was the first.)
• His running mate, J. D. Vance, is the first millennial on a major party ticket.

And the list goes on.

While the candidates are unprecedented in many ways, many of the challenges the winners will face are unprecedented as well.

Are there terrorists among us?

Israel has not faced an existential threat like the present conflict since its founding in 1948. Iran, considered by Congress to be the “largest terrorist network in the world today,” is threatening to attack Israel directly and is using its proxies in the region to mount a sustained, multi-pronged offensive against the Jewish state.

US military assets focused on China are now being reassigned to support Israel. Underscoring the threat to American forces in the region, seven US personnel were wounded Monday in a rocket attack by Iran-backed militias on a base in Iraq.

This at a time when the future of war looks very little like the past. For example, drones operated by AI systems are already being deployed by Ukraine against Russia and in conflicts across Africa. A Foreign Affairs analysis warns that the US is unprepared for this new world: our jets, ships, and tanks are not equipped to defend against an onslaught of drones, nor has our military fully embraced artificial intelligence.

In related news: Russia announced recently that it will train its troops to use nuclear weapons on the battlefield. Our mainland remains highly vulnerable to Chinese and Russian hybrid attacks utilizing long-range conventional-strike capabilities along with cyber espionage, disruptive cyberattacks on critical infrastructure, and disinformation campaigns. And we are vulnerable to attacks from within: the House Judiciary Committee issued a report this week stating that at least ninety-nine illegal aliens on the terrorist watchlist have been released into the country since January 2021.

It’s enough to make our week-long question especially urgent: How does the transformative love of Christ relate to a chaotic and fearful time like this?

“Honest but reluctant taxpayers”

The Anglican Book of Common Prayer includes this eloquent entreaty (my emphasis):

O God, the protector of all who trust in you, without whom nothing is strong, nothing is holy: Increase and multiply upon us your mercy; that, with you as our ruler and guide, we may so pass through things temporal, that we lose not the things eternal.

In his sermon titled “A Slip of the Tongue,” C. S. Lewis confesses that he had been praying these words recently and found that he had misspoken: “I had meant to pray that I might so pass through things temporal that I finally lost not the things eternal; I found I had prayed so to pass through things eternal that I finally lost not the things temporal.”

Upon reflection, Lewis realizes that “what I had inadvertently said very nearly expressed something I had really wished.” He explains his wish: to be religious enough to curry God’s favor without requiring inconvenient concessions on his part.

This wish is ours as well. In one of his most famous analogies, Lewis observes that in our response to the lordship of Christ,

We are in fact very like honest but reluctant taxpayers. We approve of an income tax in principle. We make our returns truthfully. But we dread a rise in the tax. We are very careful to pay no more than is necessary. And we hope—we very ardently hope—that after we have paid it there will still be enough left to live on.

Here’s the problem: God can only lead those who will follow and can only give what we will receive. Our spiritual compartmentalization into sacred and secular, religion and the “real world,” keeps us from experiencing his omnipotent, omniscient best. We reduce the King of the universe to a genie we consult when necessary.

And this he will not honor. As Lewis states, “It is not so much of our time and so much of our attention that God demands; it is not even all our time and all our attention; it is ourselves.”

“There’s no bargaining with him”

Here’s how this fact relates to the conflicts we’ve described today: When we respond to the transforming love of Christ by making him our master and ourselves his subject, the consequences in our lives are then his responsibility. When we are our own master, the consequences are ours.

Which approach is the better antidote to fear of the future and anxiety in the present?

In his sermon, Lewis declares:

“He claims all, because he is love and must bless. He cannot bless us unless he has us. When we try to keep within us an area that is our own, we try to keep an area of death. Therefore, in love, he claims all. There’s no bargaining with him.”

How fully would your Father say he “has” you today?

Wednesday news to know:

• Tropical Storm Debby unleashes widespread flooding across Southeast
• US to invest $2.2 billion to overhaul national power grid
• Market volatility raises questions about the staying power of the US economy
• Nobel laureate tapped to lead interim government in Bangladesh
• On this day in 1782: George Washington creates the Purple Heart

*Denison Forum does not necessarily endorse the views expressed in these stories.

Quote for the day:

“A day must come in our lives, as definite as the day of our conversion, when we give up all right to ourselves and submit to the absolute lordship of Jesus Christ.” —Watchman Nee

Denison Forum