Viktor Orban wasn’t as good as many believe, and Peter Magyar may be better than many people expect.

Viktor Orban, the valiant populist, the restorer of the Christian faith in Hungary, the welcome thorn in the side of the EU Establishment, and the strong ally of President Trump since his first bid for office, has lost his own re-election bid. I had a feeling it would come to this.

Sixteen years of uninterrupted administration as a strong force for conservative, right-wing nationalist populism have come to an end, at least under Orban’s leadership.

Sometimes, voters have a strange fatigue when it comes to governments. Fourteen years of a “Conservative” UK government ushered in the Labour Party in 2024. However, fatigue doesn’t explain Orban’s crushing loss.

What set that off?

Corruption charges and the argument that his administration had looked the other way when sex abuse scandals broke out at a local school.

Economics also reared its ugly head when the EU cut off its funding. Orban’s supposed lack of judicial reforms, as well as his uniform check on EU policy, frustrated Brussels.

Orban faced a crisis election, and inviting US VP JD Vance to campaign on his behalf didn’t help.

Why would Hungarian voters care what a foreign politician thinks? This desperate move only exacerbated how out of touch the Orban government had become. Critics also saw him as too close to Russian “president” Vladimir Putin and unhelpful in resolving the Russo-Ukrainian war. The EU had been waiting for this opportunity: an unpopular Orban facing electoral collapse.

They were salivating for a post-Orban Hungary, one that would stop its Christian restorationism, welcome more LGBT promotion, tolerate more spending, and open its borders.

Would the Orban replacement accomplish their scheme?

His challenger, Peter Magyar, was trained and prepped as an Orban acolyte.

In 2024, he broke from his party, but not over core policy. Magyar (whose name means “Hungarian,” for what it’s worth) campaigned to end corruption and restore good government in Hungary. He campaigned to the right of Orban, calling for an end to importing cheap labor into the country. He campaigned on cracking down harder on immigration—illegal and mass—than the incumbent!

His message, if anyone was listening, wasn’t pro-EU. He was still asking, “What about us Hungarians?”

Supporters of the cultural restoration Right thought that Orban was not getting the job done. Was he failing?

On April 12, 2026, Magyar’s Tisza Party swept the elections, securing a supermajority of up to 140 of 199 seats. Orban won 56 seats, and another far-right party won the rest.

Sure, EU progressive elites celebrate Orban’s loss, as did Barack Obama and George Soros. They view Orban’s downfall as a harbinger of the end of Republican hegemony in Washington later this year.

Yet look again at the results of the Hungarian parliamentary elections. I mentioned three parties that won seats: three right-wing parties. Not one left-wing or centrist element came to power or won seats. A minimum threshold of five percent in the election results is required for a party to place. The left was shut out of the Hungarian parliament.

The Right Wing won Hungary. Orban may have lost his premiership, but Orbanism is standing strong.

This election focused on personalities, not principles.

Magyar is just as socially conservative as Orban. He has already pledged to end the foreign permit workers. He wants to give Hungarians abroad a chance to return to their home country and thrive again. That’s about as “Hungary First” as it gets!

Magyar has already stated that he will not support fast-tracking Ukraine’s membership into the EU. Huge move for ending the Russo-Ukrainian war!

He announced a diversification plan for energy. Instead of relying predominantly on Russia, he wants to draw oil from the South and the West, as well. This sounds like real economic freedom for Hungary. National populism is great, but it must face economic realities. Too many right-wing populist governments are shoveling out money to voters for school supplies, raising families, and pensions. Where is the money supposed to come from? More taxes?! From whom?

Right-wing socialism is still…socialism, and Orban had a problem here.

Eventually, the government runs out of others’ money, or inflation bites whatever purchasing power the government intended for the people. Inflation and tariff pressures weighed down Orban’s reelection chances.

Orban’s Hungary was still not the perfect social conservative paradise for other reasons. Prostitution is still legal. Abortion is also still legal. While countries need to encourage their native populations to bear children, that vision will collapse in the face of easy sex and no responsibility. Cultural norms need reinforcement, with no tolerance for deviance.

Orban and his party imposed vaccine passports and health mandates during COVID. How is this good for the working public? Where is the freedom? Too much state-sponsored anything is bad for a country.

Even now, Hungarians cannot own a gun without passing strict major government demands. Czechia made self-defense a right, and in Switzerland everyone owns a gun (Though it’s registered with the state).

Throughout his tenure, Orban strengthened ties with China, joining the deceptive Belt and Road initiative. He even allowed Chinese police to operate in his country! American citizens voiced righteous outrage when the local press exposed former New York City mayor Eric Adams for allowing a CCP-run police station in the Big Apple. Yet no one on the Right complained about Orban allowing the CCP into Hungary? That’s wrong.

There’s room for improvement, and Magyar can exceed Orban’s victories while correcting his mistakes.

He is already doubling down on stopping mass migration!

He is committed to putting all Hungarians first and fighting for the rights of ethnic Hungarians in other countries.

Magyar must revive and restore Hungary’s economy. One can hope he will place his country in a better position to profit without dependence and root out undue Chinese influence.

In a media masterstroke, he appeared on state television to discuss his plans for the country. Without missing a beat, he dressed down the reporter interviewing him, castigating the news organization for not allowing him on their program over the last year and a half. He then scolded them for lying about him and his family.

Then came the coup de grace: he announced his government plan to cut their funding and shut them down. Hungary needs honest independent media, he said, not government-funded agitprop that would inspire envy in Joseph Goebbels or North Korea.

He is not hostile to Putin, but he will not engage him aggressively either: sounds a lot like Trump!

He will not participate in the EU migration pact. He is keeping up the border fences, but he has also pledged to find a way for the EU to release the funds the country needs.

He is making inroads with his Slavic neighbors, including the more populist, nationalist leaders in Slovakia and Czechia

Magyar reminds me of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. He isn’t just talking the national populist talk. He is walking the walk, and he is sprinting ahead with major reforms.

Orban was T-800. Magyar may well be T-1000, and the EU Left is going to find that he will be worse for their globalist, leftist, secularist agenda.

Source: Orban Versus Magyar: What Happened? – American Thinker

There was skepticism when President Trump nominated Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to be secretary of Health and Human Services.  He was grilled by Democrats in Congress over his vaccine statements, and there were even Republicans, including Senators Tillis, Murkowski, Cassidy, and McConnell, who questioned the choice.

It’s been just over a year since Kennedy took office, so it’s a good time to ask: How’s he doing?  Compared to his predecessor in HHS — whom no one can name, actually — what has he accomplished so far?

In his short time in office, RFK Jr. has done a lot to save America.  He has directed food manufacturers to remove artificial dyes from their products.  He has overseen the issuance of a revised food pyramid stressing whole foods over processed ones and restoring saturated fat to the diet.  He has revised guidelines for vaccinations that are not based on the science.  He has stepped up studies of chronic childhood disease, and he has ordered unhealthy processed foods to be removed from SNAP and school lunch programs.  He has also proposed reinstating the presidential fitness test in schools, and his MAHA Commission is charged with examining the role of fitness across the board.

Certainly, RFK Jr. is facing an uphill battle in changing America’s lifestyle choices.  A brief tour of any grocery store reveals part of the problem: aisle upon aisle of chips, cookies, sweetened baked goods, overly salted canned goods, and an oversupply of meat and other animal products — far more than our ancestors consumed even fifty years ago.  These choices mirror the habits of consumers.  If the public wanted more soy milk and kale crackers, these items would dominate the aisles, but lifestyle choices take decades to alter.

Sixty years ago, government began educating the public about the cancer risk of smoking.  It took decades, but now smoking has declined from 85% among men in the 1950s to around 20% today, and the incidence of lung cancer has declined along with it, with lung cancer incidence declining between 1990 and 2007 by 15.3% and from 2007 to 2015 by another 25% among males.  But heart disease, diabetes, and other cancers continue to plague America.

What stands out is that it took so long for the public to change its ways.  The first mandatory warnings appeared on cigarette packages exactly sixty years ago.  RFK Jr.’s agenda focuses on banning toxic chemicals in food and food packaging, including PFAS, BPA, BHA, BHT, and industrial solvents; elimination synthetic food dyes; and reducing consumption of processed food.  Along with this, he is promoting organic and whole foods and food from grass-fed and free-range animal products.  Taken together, I believe that these changes would go a long way toward making America healthy again, but so far, Kennedy’s emphasis has been on removing what is toxic and not on adding what is healthy.

Healthy eating is a niche in America, and only that.  Healthy living videos by Dr. Joel Fuhrman and others are popular on YouTube, but the percentage of the population that watches them is infinitesimal.  It’s estimated that McDonald’s alone sells some 2.63 billion hamburgers annually, and that is just one fast food chain.  Frozen prepared food is often not very different from fast food in terms of fat, salt, and sugar content.

Occasionally, politicians have tried to impose food choices on the public, such as when New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg limited the size of soft drinks to 16 oz., but always with disappointing results.  The public will not change until it wants to change.

In fact, the consumption of pizza and burgers, and hot dogs and sausage, and luncheon meats and fried foods — and the corresponding lack of consumption of fruits and vegetables, greens, tofu, nuts, and seeds, and the lack of daily exercise — contributes to many of America’s health problems.  There is abundant evidence for this statement.  The WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified processed meat as “Group 1: Carcinogenic to Humans.”  The American Diabetes Association recommends eating less processed food and specifically less in refined carbohydrates and less in added sugars.  The American Heart Association offers a succinct guideline for healthy eating that includes eating more nuts and whole grains along with fruits, vegetables, beans, fish, and low-fat dairy and avoiding processed foods.  The information is out there, but it has not yet sunk in.

Kennedy has also done less to promote exercise than might be expected of a MAHA advocate.  It will take more than a 90-second shirtless video with Kid Rock (which many mocked) to get Americans off the couch.  JFK’s U.S. Physical Fitness Program, headed up by Coach Bud Wilkinson of the University of Oklahoma, set modest goals, such as 15 minutes of physical exercise for all students and testing to track improvement.  In many schools, the program involved much more than 15 minutes, and the results were substantial in the short run, but JFK’s fitness program ended with Kennedy’s death in 1963 and would probably have faded away regardless.

One could argue that some form of fitness program in the schools is far more important today than it was in 1961, when JFK’s program began.  A 2019 article revealed that 27% of potential Army enlistees were too obese or overweight to enlist and that another 47% of men and 59% of women failed the entry-level training test following enlistment.  But nothing the government has done, including the Army’s own attempt to prepare recruits in advance, has made much of a difference.  Obesity rates have doubled over the past 30 years, and they continue to rise.

As always, government programs, however well meaning, cannot alter habits that the public does not want to change.  Tobacco usage declined slowly over decades as the public came to understand tobacco’s relationship with lung cancer and heart disease, but the public made these changes largely on its own.  Government can ban certain toxic chemicals, but essential lifestyle changes have to come from individuals.  Once the public comes to see the dangers of unhealthy habits, it will make the necessary changes, but it will take time.

America is fortunate to have an HHS director who is passionate about making America healthy again.  Some of his actions will have almost immediate benefits, whereas others, such as the Kid Rock video, will have none at all.  What can actually make America healthier is the realization that lifestyle changes may lead to a happier and longer life.  Government can promote that idea, but until it actually sinks in, health changes will be slow to come.

Jeffrey Folks is the author of many books and articles on American culture, most recently Heartland of the Imagination (2011).

Source: RFK Jr. Is Doing Well – American Thinker

A shocking 94 percent of California teenagers and young adults report experiencing “mental health challenges” in an average month, according to a new poll commissioned by Blue Shield of California’s BlueSky “youth mental health initiative.”

When asked, “How is your mental health today,” almost half of the youth in Los Angeles reported that it was “fair” or “poor.” Statewide, almost a third said the same, with the numbers getting worse and worse as time goes on.

The polling results correspond with the latest CDC data showing 40 percent of youth feel “persistent sadness or hopelessness.” Even more shocking, the national survey found 20 percent seriously considered attempting suicide. Almost 10 percent actually attempted suicide, just over the past year

Ironically, the record levels of mental issues among young Americans come even as government at all levels and public schools roll out more “mental health” and “social-emotional learning” schemes than ever before in history. Some critics suggest there is a link.

Under the guise of dealing with what self-styled experts are calling an unprecedented mental health “crisis,” Big Pharma-funded policymakers are working to make dangerous psychotropic drugs more widely available to young people.

As The Newman Report exposed last year, an official “mental health app” backed by the state of California is targeting vulnerable children with controversial propaganda involving the occult, the New Age, homosexuality, transgenderism, fornication, and more.

With God and the Bible increasingly sidelined, much of the angst being felt by youth in the Golden State is due to confusion. In fact, indoctrination and propaganda in government schools and so-called “social media” are key, the survey results revealed.

According to the poll, 85 percent of youngsters pointed to “gun violence” as a major stressor contributing to the supposed mental-health challenges. Almost eight in 10 cited concerns about alleged man-made “climate change.”

The constant race mongering and “LGBTQ+” propaganda is also taking a toll, with almost 80 percent reporting concerns about “racism” and nearly 70 percent pointing to “discrimination against LGBTQ+ people.”

Concerns about supposed discrimination against immigrants were even more stressful to the state’s increasingly indoctrinated young people, with over 80 percent calling it a “stressor.”

No doubt responding to establishment efforts to promote and normalize censorship, some 84 percent of youth are concerned about the negative impact of “misinformation” online. Virtually all of the young people—97 percent—reported using social media for “fun and entertainment.”

“The data shows youth are deeply affected by the world around them, from climate anxiety and safety to social media pressures,” argued Dr. Nicole Stelter, director of Behavioral Health at Blue Shield of California. “Young people are concerned about the future and how we treat one another.”

“It’s more important than ever that clinicians, educators, policymakers and caring adults listen to what our youth are saying and treat this seriously for what it is — a youth mental health crisis,” added Dr. Stelter.

To help deal with this supposed “mental health crisis,” the Blue Shield of California health plan launched its scheme known as “Blue Sky.” According to a press release, the initiative has supported tens of thousands of “youth” and “educators” while engaging in “youth-driven advocacy.”

Blue Shield’s Blue Sky initiative chief Paula Ambrose suggested that ever-larger quantities of young people must obtain “professional mental health support” to help deal with this. Apparently, “stigma” is holding some back, and so visiting “professionals” must be promoted and normalized.

“It’s clear that stigma is still standing in the way of healing,” said Ambrose. “Reducing stigma isn’t just about encouraging youth to speak up — it’s also about making sure we’re listening and acting on what they’re telling us.”

Ironically, despite the mushrooming growth of “mental health” schemes, drugging, and “social-emotional learning,” the numbers keep getting worse. When Blue Shield polled youth in 2023, 87 percent reported “mental health challenges,” compared with 94 percent in 2025.

The Blue Shield survey was conducted by an outfit called “Children Now,” described as a “leading nonpartisan, California-based research and policy organization.” It was conducted last year and polled some 750 California residents between the ages of 14 and 25.

In Illinois, lawmakers recently approved universal “mental health” screening for all children in government schools. Critics from across the political spectrum and even leaders from within the field of psychiatry slammed the move.

Legendary Harvard-trained psychiatrist Dr. Peter Breggin blasted the schemes of lawmakers to screen all students and normalize the idea of ubiquitous “mental health” issues among children while peddling drugs.

“The idea of screening school children for mental problems is equivalent to screening them for the drug market,” Breggin explained. “This will stigmatize increasing numbers of children, lead many of them to taking dangerous psychiatric drugs, and push some into a lifetime ‘career’ as mental patients.”

“Nothing is worse than telling a child they have a mental problem, first because it demoralizes them, and second because the problem, if there is one, is corrected by improving how we relate to them,” added the psychiatrist, whose work exposing everything from lobotomies to Prozac has led to profound changes in the industry.

The Illinois legislature, where almost 90 percent of politicians’ campaigns are funded by Big Pharma, is also working on bills to mandate “mental health education” and more “social-emotional learning” for students in government schools.

Ironically, a peer-reviewed study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that “youth suicides are closely tied with in-person school attendance.” When school is out for summer, the number of suicides among students plummets, before skyrocketing again when school begins.

When the Bible, prayer, close-knit family, and biblical education were the norm, there was no “mental health” crisis among children — no epidemic of child suicide, school shootings, or persistent hopelessness. This is all a modern phenomenon.

What the youth need is not “climate” hysteria, gender-bending indoctrination, endless “race” mongering, or even more “mental health” schemes at their government school. What they really need is Truth and love.

In the end, only parents can rescue and protect their children from this escalating horror show. The wellbeing of their precious progeny literally depends on taking urgent action, before it is too late.

Alex Newman is an award-winning international journalist, the Founder of Liberty Sentinel, and a Contributor to Harbinger’s Daily.

Source: When Biblical Education Was The Norm, There Was No ‘Mental Health’ Crisis Among Children – Harbinger’s Daily